Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GRVY vs NCTY vs GAME vs NTES vs BILI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GRVY
Gravity Co., Ltd.

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia

TechnologyNASDAQ • KR
Market Cap$421M
5Y Perf.+29.1%
NCTY
The9 Limited

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia

TechnologyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$26M
5Y Perf.-90.0%
GAME
GameSquare Holdings, Inc.

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$17M
5Y Perf.-98.5%
NTES
NetEase, Inc.

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia

TechnologyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$74.15B
5Y Perf.+51.4%
BILI
Bilibili Inc.

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia

TechnologyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$7.32B
5Y Perf.-32.0%

GRVY vs NCTY vs GAME vs NTES vs BILI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GRVY logoGRVY
NCTY logoNCTY
GAME logoGAME
NTES logoNTES
BILI logoBILI
IndustryElectronic Gaming & MultimediaElectronic Gaming & MultimediaElectronic Gaming & MultimediaElectronic Gaming & MultimediaElectronic Gaming & Multimedia
Market Cap$421M$26M$17M$74.15B$7.32B
Revenue (TTM)$561.99B$289M$87M$112.25B$29.38B
Net Income (TTM)$80.77B$-228M$-40M$33.67B$220M
Gross Margin36.2%-14.1%15.4%64.3%35.9%
Operating Margin15.8%-140.6%-50.0%31.8%1.1%
Forward P/E8.9x1.8x3.1x
Total Debt$0.00$235M$24M$6.39B$5.15B
Cash & Equiv.$203.59B$59M$12M$51.52B$10.25B

GRVY vs NCTY vs GAME vs NTES vs BILILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GRVY
NCTY
GAME
NTES
BILI
StockMay 20May 26Return
Gravity Co., Ltd. (GRVY)100129.1+29.1%
The9 Limited (NCTY)10010.0-90.0%
GameSquare Holdings… (GAME)1001.5-98.5%
NetEase, Inc. (NTES)100151.4+51.4%
Bilibili Inc. (BILI)10068.0-32.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GRVY vs NCTY vs GAME vs NTES vs BILI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NTES leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Gravity Co., Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. GAME and BILI also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GRVY
Gravity Co., Ltd.
The Long-Run Compounder

GRVY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and defensive is your priority.

  • 30.2% 10Y total return vs NTES's 375.8%
  • Beta 0.61, current ratio 7.27x
  • Beta 0.61 vs NCTY's 2.56
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
NCTY
The9 Limited
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, NCTY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
GAME
GameSquare Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Play

GAME ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 132.9%, EPS growth 37.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 42.4%
  • 132.9% revenue growth vs NCTY's -7.4%
Best for: growth exposure
NTES
NetEase, Inc.
The Income Pick

NTES carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 2.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 3.9%, current ratio 3.45x
  • PEG 0.08 vs GRVY's 5.11
  • Lower P/E (1.8x vs 3.1x)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
BILI
Bilibili Inc.
The Momentum Pick

BILI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +25.0% vs NCTY's -46.7%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGAME logoGAME132.9% revenue growth vs NCTY's -7.4%
ValueNTES logoNTESLower P/E (1.8x vs 3.1x)
Quality / MarginsNTES logoNTES30.0% margin vs NCTY's -78.9%
Stability / SafetyGRVY logoGRVYBeta 0.61 vs NCTY's 2.56
DividendsNTES logoNTES2.6% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BILI logoBILI+25.0% vs NCTY's -46.7%
Efficiency (ROA)NTES logoNTES15.2% ROA vs GAME's -90.8%, ROIC 23.3% vs -126.4%

GRVY vs NCTY vs GAME vs NTES vs BILI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GRVYGravity Co., Ltd.
FY 2025
Royalties And License Fees
81.2%$64.6B
Other Service Contract
18.8%$15.0B
NCTYThe9 Limited
FY 2025
Cryptocurrency Mining Revenue
100.0%$56M
GAMEGameSquare Holdings, Inc.
FY 2024
SaaS Revenue
81.2%$52M
Agency Revenue
18.8%$12M
NTESNetEase, Inc.
FY 2024
Innovative businesses and others
59.0%$8.1B
Youdao
41.0%$5.6B
BILIBilibili Inc.
FY 2024
Value Added Services
44.4%$11.0B
Advertising
33.0%$8.2B
Mobile Game Services
22.6%$5.6B

GRVY vs NCTY vs GAME vs NTES vs BILI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNTESLAGGINGBILI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NTES leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

GRVY is the larger business by revenue, generating $562.0B annually — 6471.1x GAME's $87M. NTES is the more profitable business, keeping 30.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NCTY's -78.9%. On growth, GRVY holds the edge at +38.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGRVY logoGRVYGravity Co., Ltd.NCTY logoNCTYThe9 LimitedGAME logoGAMEGameSquare Holdin…NTES logoNTESNetEase, Inc.BILI logoBILIBilibili Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$562.0B$289M$87M$112.2B$29.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$98.2B-$407M-$40M$38.0B$845M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$80.8B-$228M-$40M$33.7B$220M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$0-$62M-$20M$48.5B$3.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+36.2%-14.1%+15.4%+64.3%+35.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+15.8%-140.6%-50.0%+31.8%+1.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+14.4%-78.9%-46.1%+30.0%+0.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+13.4%-21.5%-23.4%+43.2%+11.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+38.9%-74.3%-11.1%+1.6%+19.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+5.4%-183.2%+79.6%-30.4%+134.9%
NTES leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

GRVY leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 8.9x trailing earnings, GRVY trades at a 43% valuation discount to NTES's 15.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NTES offers better value at 0.67x vs GRVY's 5.11x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricGRVY logoGRVYGravity Co., Ltd.NCTY logoNCTYThe9 LimitedGAME logoGAMEGameSquare Holdin…NTES logoNTESNetEase, Inc.BILI logoBILIBilibili Inc.
Market CapShares × price$421M$26M$17M$74.2B$7.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$281M$52M$29M$67.5B$6.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS8.94x-0.76x-0.26x15.63x-46.31x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.1.84x3.08x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate5.11x0.67x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple5.09x12.40x38.62x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.08x1.72x0.18x4.61x1.86x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.96x1.20x1.04x3.10x4.42x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.04x10.44x11.69x
GRVY leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NTES leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

NTES delivers a 20.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-3 for GAME. NTES carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GAME's 1.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTES scores 8/9 vs NCTY's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricGRVY logoGRVYGravity Co., Ltd.NCTY logoNCTYThe9 LimitedGAME logoGAMEGameSquare Holdin…NTES logoNTESNetEase, Inc.BILI logoBILIBilibili Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+14.1%-120.6%-3.2%+20.4%+1.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+11.8%-45.2%-90.8%+15.2%+0.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+15.5%-37.2%-126.4%+23.3%-8.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+13.1%-70.7%-175.8%+22.1%-8.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–962487
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.97x1.97x0.04x0.36x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$203.6B$176M$12M-$45.1B-$5.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$203.6B$59M$12M$51.5B$10.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$235M$24M$6.4B$5.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense15.33x-9.65x-466.47x3.10x
NTES leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NTES leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NTES five years ago would be worth $11,631 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $129 for GAME. Over the past 12 months, BILI leads with a +25.0% total return vs NCTY's -46.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTES at 11.2% vs GAME's -52.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGRVY logoGRVYGravity Co., Ltd.NCTY logoNCTYThe9 LimitedGAME logoGAMEGameSquare Holdin…NTES logoNTESNetEase, Inc.BILI logoBILIBilibili Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+3.4%-9.1%+2.6%-19.8%-16.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+0.7%-46.7%-31.6%+12.8%+25.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+9.7%-31.0%-89.6%+37.4%+10.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-44.8%-96.8%-98.7%+16.3%-78.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+3024.2%-99.1%-100.0%+375.8%+95.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+3.1%-11.6%-52.9%+11.2%+3.2%
NTES leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

GRVY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

GRVY is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NCTY's 2.56 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GRVY currently trades 81.1% from its 52-week high vs GAME's 15.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGRVY logoGRVYGravity Co., Ltd.NCTY logoNCTYThe9 LimitedGAME logoGAMEGameSquare Holdin…NTES logoNTESNetEase, Inc.BILI logoBILIBilibili Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.64x2.48x2.37x0.75x1.79x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$74.75$12.51$2.87$159.55$36.40
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$54.54$5.00$0.23$103.23$17.45
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+81.1%+45.2%+15.5%+73.4%+60.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.954.951.058.543.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded29K31K9.0M750K2.4M
GRVY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

NTES leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: NCTY as "Sell", NTES as "Buy", BILI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 54.7% upside for BILI (target: $34) vs 27.9% for NTES (target: $150). NTES is the only dividend payer here at 2.62% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricGRVY logoGRVYGravity Co., Ltd.NCTY logoNCTYThe9 LimitedGAME logoGAMEGameSquare Holdin…NTES logoNTESNetEase, Inc.BILI logoBILIBilibili Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellSellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$149.75$34.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts33224
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises14
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$20.90
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.1%+0.2%
NTES leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

NTES leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GRVY leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallNetEase, Inc. (NTES)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GRVY vs NCTY vs GAME vs NTES vs BILI: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GRVY or NCTY or GAME or NTES or BILI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, GameSquare Holdings, Inc.

(GAME) is the stronger pick with 132. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for The9 Limited (NCTY). Gravity Co. , Ltd. (GRVY) offers the better valuation at 8. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NetEase, Inc. (NTES) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GRVY or NCTY or GAME or NTES or BILI?

On trailing P/E, Gravity Co.

, Ltd. (GRVY) is the cheapest at 8. 9x versus NetEase, Inc. at 15. 6x. On forward P/E, NetEase, Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GRVY or NCTY or GAME or NTES or BILI?

Over the past 5 years, NetEase, Inc.

(NTES) delivered a total return of +16. 3%, compared to -98. 7% for GameSquare Holdings, Inc. (GAME). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GRVY returned +32. 7% versus GAME's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GRVY or NCTY or GAME or NTES or BILI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gravity Co.

, Ltd. (GRVY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 64β versus The9 Limited's 2. 48β — meaning NCTY is approximately 290% more volatile than GRVY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NetEase, Inc. (NTES) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 197% for GameSquare Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GRVY or NCTY or GAME or NTES or BILI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), GameSquare Holdings, Inc.

(GAME) is pulling ahead at 132. 9% versus -7. 4% for The9 Limited (NCTY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bilibili Inc. grew EPS 72. 3% year-over-year, compared to -225. 0% for The9 Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, GAME leads at 42. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GRVY or NCTY or GAME or NTES or BILI?

NetEase, Inc.

(NTES) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 0% net margin versus -373. 0% for The9 Limited — meaning it keeps 30. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NTES leads at 31. 8% versus -229. 6% for NCTY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTES leads at 64. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GRVY or NCTY or GAME or NTES or BILI more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, NetEase, Inc.

(NTES) trades at 1. 8x forward P/E versus 3. 1x for Bilibili Inc. — 1. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BILI: 54. 7% to $34. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GRVY or NCTY or GAME or NTES or BILI?

In this comparison, NTES (2.

6% yield) pays a dividend. GRVY, NCTY, GAME, BILI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is GRVY or NCTY or GAME or NTES or BILI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, NetEase, Inc.

(NTES) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75), 2. 6% yield, +371. 5% 10Y return). GameSquare Holdings, Inc. (GAME) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTES: +371. 5%, GAME: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GRVY and NCTY and GAME and NTES and BILI?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: GRVY is a small-cap deep-value stock; NCTY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GAME is a small-cap high-growth stock; NTES is a mid-cap deep-value stock; BILI is a small-cap high-growth stock. NTES pays a dividend while GRVY, NCTY, GAME, BILI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

GRVY

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NCTY

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GAME

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NTES

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 18%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BILI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Gross Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GRVY and NCTY and GAME and NTES and BILI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(GRVY: 38.9% · NCTY: -74.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.