Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GRWG vs IIPR vs CGC vs REFI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Industrial
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
REIT - Mortgage
GRWG vs IIPR vs CGC vs REFI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | REIT - Industrial | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $85M | $1.62B | $122M | $245M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $162M | $263M | $294M | $44M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-24M | $120M | $-327M | $4.87B |
| Gross Margin | 26.8% | 60.3% | 22.8% | 95.6% |
| Operating Margin | -15.7% | 46.7% | -24.1% | 18.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.2x | — | 6.4x |
| Total Debt | $29M | $394M | $348M | $98M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $48M | $114M | $15M |
GRWG vs IIPR vs CGC vs REFI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GrowGeneration Corp. (GRWG) | 100 | 10.9 | -89.1% |
| Innovative Industri… (IIPR) | 100 | 21.5 | -78.5% |
| Canopy Growth Corpo… (CGC) | 100 | 1.3 | -98.7% |
| Chicago Atlantic Re… (REFI) | 100 | 69.8 | -30.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GRWG vs IIPR vs CGC vs REFI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GRWG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +25.7% vs CGC's -12.4%
IIPR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 436.4% 10Y total return vs REFI's 24.7%
- 13.5% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs REFI's 100.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- 5.1% ROA vs CGC's -29.5%, ROIC 4.3% vs -10.2%
CGC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
REFI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.69, yield 100.0%
- Rev growth 15.2%, EPS growth -10.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.69, Low D/E 32.0%, current ratio 0.28x
- Beta 0.69, yield 100.0%, current ratio 0.28x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.2% FFO/revenue growth vs GRWG's -14.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 109.7% margin vs CGC's -111.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.69 vs CGC's 1.90, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 13.5% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs REFI's 100.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +25.7% vs CGC's -12.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.1% ROA vs CGC's -29.5%, ROIC 4.3% vs -10.2% |
GRWG vs IIPR vs CGC vs REFI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
GRWG vs IIPR vs CGC vs REFI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
REFI leads in 3 of 6 categories
IIPR leads 1 • GRWG leads 0 • CGC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REFI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CGC is the larger business by revenue, generating $294M annually — 6.6x REFI's $44M. REFI is the more profitable business, keeping 109.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CGC's -111.0%. On growth, CGC holds the edge at +20.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $162M | $263M | $294M | $44M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$14M | $197M | -$32M | $8M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$24M | $120M | -$327M | $4.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $144M | -$86M | $3.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.8% | +60.3% | +22.8% | +95.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.7% | +46.7% | -24.1% | +18.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -14.9% | +45.6% | -111.0% | +109.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.2% | +54.7% | -29.3% | +71.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.0% | -3.8% | +20.9% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +69.2% | -1.0% | +83.8% | -51.1% |
Valuation Metrics
REFI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.9x trailing earnings, REFI trades at a 52% valuation discount to IIPR's 14.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, REFI's 9.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IIPR's 9.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $85M | $1.6B | $122M | $245M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $84M | $2.0B | $293M | $328M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.55x | 14.40x | -0.28x | 6.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.17x | — | 6.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.85x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.91x | — | 9.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.53x | 6.08x | 0.62x | 3.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.87x | 0.87x | 0.34x | 0.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.26x | — | 0.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IIPR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IIPR delivers a 6.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-43 for CGC. IIPR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CGC's 0.72x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GRWG scores 6/9 vs IIPR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -22.9% | +6.4% | -43.1% | +6.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.2% | +5.1% | -29.5% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -16.9% | +4.3% | -10.2% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -18.8% | +5.8% | -12.4% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | 0.21x | 0.72x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$929,000 | $346M | $235M | $83M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $48M | $114M | $15M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $29M | $394M | $348M | $98M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 6.67x | -7.79x | 4.77x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
REFI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in REFI five years ago would be worth $12,468 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $45 for CGC. Over the past 12 months, GRWG leads with a +25.7% total return vs CGC's -12.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REFI at 7.9% vs CGC's -55.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.8% | +18.3% | -5.0% | -1.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +25.7% | +20.3% | -12.4% | -7.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.0% | +14.1% | -91.4% | +25.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.7% | -50.0% | -99.6% | +24.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.7% | +436.4% | -94.3% | +24.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -27.6% | +4.5% | -55.9% | +7.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IIPR and REFI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
REFI is the less volatile stock with a 0.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CGC's 1.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IIPR currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs CGC's 47.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.27x | 0.92x | 1.90x | 0.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.40 | $61.40 | $2.38 | $15.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.87 | $44.58 | $0.84 | $10.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.2% | +92.2% | +47.5% | +76.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.2 | 59.3 | 52.9 | 58.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 476K | 303K | 10.4M | 167K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IIPR and REFI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IIPR as "Hold", CGC as "Hold", REFI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1180.5% upside for CGC (target: $14) vs -22.3% for IIPR (target: $44). For income investors, REFI offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs IIPR's 13.46%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $44.00 | $14.47 | $14.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 26 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +13.5% | — | +100.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 9 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $7.62 | — | $2045.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
REFI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IIPR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
GRWG vs IIPR vs CGC vs REFI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GRWG or IIPR or CGC or REFI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(REFI) is the stronger pick with 15. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 4% for GrowGeneration Corp. (GRWG). Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI) offers the better valuation at 6. 9x trailing P/E (6. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GRWG or IIPR or CGC or REFI?
On trailing P/E, Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(REFI) is the cheapest at 6. 9x versus Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. at 14. 4x. On forward P/E, Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GRWG or IIPR or CGC or REFI?
Over the past 5 years, Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(REFI) delivered a total return of +24. 7%, compared to -99. 6% for Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IIPR returned +436. 4% versus CGC's -94. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GRWG or IIPR or CGC or REFI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(REFI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 69β versus Canopy Growth Corporation's 1. 90β — meaning CGC is approximately 176% more volatile than REFI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 72% for Canopy Growth Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GRWG or IIPR or CGC or REFI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(REFI) is pulling ahead at 15. 2% versus -14. 4% for GrowGeneration Corp. (GRWG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GrowGeneration Corp. grew EPS 51. 2% year-over-year, compared to -28. 8% for Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, REFI leads at 8. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GRWG or IIPR or CGC or REFI?
Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(REFI) is the more profitable company, earning 57. 1% net margin versus -222. 4% for Canopy Growth Corporation — meaning it keeps 57. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REFI leads at 57. 1% versus -43. 5% for CGC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IIPR leads at 88. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GRWG or IIPR or CGC or REFI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(REFI) trades at 6. 4x forward P/E versus 13. 2x for Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. — 6. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CGC: 1180. 5% to $14. 47.
08Which pays a better dividend — GRWG or IIPR or CGC or REFI?
In this comparison, REFI (100.
0% yield), IIPR (13. 5% yield) pay a dividend. GRWG, CGC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GRWG or IIPR or CGC or REFI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
(IIPR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92), 13. 5% yield, +436. 4% 10Y return). Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) carries a higher beta of 1. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IIPR: +436. 4%, CGC: -94. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GRWG and IIPR and CGC and REFI?
These companies operate in different sectors (GRWG (Consumer Cyclical) and IIPR (Real Estate) and CGC (Healthcare) and REFI (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GRWG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IIPR is a small-cap deep-value stock; CGC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; REFI is a small-cap high-growth stock. IIPR, REFI pay a dividend while GRWG, CGC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.