Financial - Capital Markets
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GSIW vs FUTU vs UP vs TIGR vs PFIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Financial - Capital Markets
Banks - Regional
GSIW vs FUTU vs UP vs TIGR vs PFIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Financial - Capital Markets | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $457M | $51.52B | $242M | $628M | $590M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5M | $13.59B | $736M | $392M | $281M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13M | $7.91B | $-294M | $118M | $59M |
| Gross Margin | 4.7% | 82.0% | 2.2% | 65.0% | 66.6% |
| Operating Margin | -80.0% | 48.7% | -34.3% | 35.6% | 25.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 1.5x | — | 6.8x | 9.0x |
| Total Debt | $199K | $8.55B | $157M | $180M | $258M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $625K | $11.69B | $134M | $394M | $58M |
GSIW vs FUTU vs UP vs TIGR vs PFIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Garden Stage Limite… (GSIW) | 100 | 1.9 | -98.1% |
| Futu Holdings Limit… (FUTU) | 100 | 265.2 | +165.2% |
| Wheels Up Experienc… (UP) | 100 | 9.8 | -90.2% |
| UP Fintech Holding … (TIGR) | 100 | 145.5 | +45.5% |
| Peoples Financial S… (PFIS) | 100 | 121.1 | +21.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GSIW vs FUTU vs UP vs TIGR vs PFIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GSIW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and efficiency is your priority.
- 296.0% NII/revenue growth vs UP's -7.0%
- 6.6% ROA vs UP's -29.1%
FUTU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs PFIS's 93.9%
- PEG 0.02 vs PFIS's 1.13
- Better valuation composite
- 40.1% margin vs GSIW's -79.9%
UP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
TIGR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 43.7%, EPS growth 71.4%
PFIS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 4.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 49.7%, current ratio 8.76x
- Beta 0.82, yield 4.1%, current ratio 8.76x
- NIM 3.1% vs GSIW's 0.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 296.0% NII/revenue growth vs UP's -7.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 40.1% margin vs GSIW's -79.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs UP's 2.50 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield; 9-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.1% vs UP's -71.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.6% ROA vs UP's -29.1% |
GSIW vs FUTU vs UP vs TIGR vs PFIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GSIW vs FUTU vs UP vs TIGR vs PFIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FUTU leads in 2 of 6 categories
PFIS leads 2 • GSIW leads 1 • UP leads 0 • TIGR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUTU leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUTU is the larger business by revenue, generating $13.6B annually — 2515.3x GSIW's $5M. FUTU is the more profitable business, keeping 40.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GSIW's -79.9%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5M | $13.6B | $736M | $392M | $281M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | $10.0B | -$191M | $225M | $80M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13M | $7.9B | -$294M | $118M | $59M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13M | $0 | -$270M | $673M | $43M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +82.0% | +2.2% | +65.0% | +66.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -80.0% | +48.7% | -34.3% | +35.6% | +25.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -79.9% | +40.1% | -39.9% | +15.5% | +21.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -25.3% | +2.3% | -36.7% | +2.1% | +15.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | -10.2% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.7% | +112.0% | +69.2% | +12.4% | +95.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FUTU and TIGR each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.0x trailing earnings, PFIS trades at a 66% valuation discount to FUTU's 29.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FUTU offers better value at 0.30x vs PFIS's 1.25x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $457M | $51.5B | $242M | $628M | $590M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $456M | $51.1B | $265M | $414M | $790M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -104.39x | 29.18x | -0.80x | 17.86x | 10.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 1.53x | — | 6.79x | 9.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.30x | — | — | 1.25x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 58.89x | — | 2.80x | 10.94x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 84.53x | 29.69x | 0.33x | 1.60x | 2.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 68.14x | 5.67x | — | 1.64x | 1.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.09x | — | 0.76x | 13.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GSIW leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GSIW delivers a 14.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $12 for PFIS. GSIW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PFIS's 0.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TIGR scores 6/9 vs UP's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.9% | +26.4% | — | +17.6% | +11.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.6% | +4.6% | -29.1% | +1.6% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -39.3% | +14.8% | — | +13.8% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -53.1% | +25.1% | -167.1% | +18.7% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.31x | — | 0.27x | 0.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$425,481 | -$3.1B | $23M | -$214M | $200M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $624,583 | $11.7B | $134M | $394M | $58M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $199,102 | $8.6B | $157M | $180M | $258M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | -2.21x | 3.26x | 0.77x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUTU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PFIS five years ago would be worth $15,747 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $34 for UP. Over the past 12 months, FUTU leads with a +45.1% total return vs UP's -71.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUTU at 53.6% vs GSIW's -75.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.1% | -17.4% | -49.2% | -38.4% | +23.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -64.8% | +45.1% | -71.4% | -29.9% | +34.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | +262.2% | -93.2% | +121.7% | +70.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | +15.0% | -99.7% | -62.3% | +57.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | +875.5% | -99.7% | -39.9% | +93.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -75.7% | +53.6% | -59.3% | +30.4% | +19.5% |
Risk & Volatility
PFIS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PFIS is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UP's 2.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PFIS currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs GSIW's 8.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.04x | 2.04x | 2.50x | 2.02x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $358.00 | $202.53 | $70.00 | $13.55 | $59.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.15 | $99.20 | $0.75 | $5.95 | $43.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +8.2% | +71.5% | +9.6% | +47.5% | +98.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.4 | 65.0 | 38.9 | 52.1 | 60.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 62K | 1.4M | 131K | 2.3M | 53K |
Analyst Outlook
PFIS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FUTU as "Buy", UP as "Hold", TIGR as "Sell", PFIS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 7373.8% upside for UP (target: $500) vs -26.4% for TIGR (target: $5). PFIS is the only dividend payer here at 4.15% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Sell | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $224.80 | $500.00 | $4.73 | $56.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 9 | 4 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — | 9 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $2.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FUTU leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). PFIS leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
GSIW vs FUTU vs UP vs TIGR vs PFIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GSIW or FUTU or UP or TIGR or PFIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares (GSIW) is the stronger pick with 296.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 0% for Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP). Peoples Financial Services Corp. (PFIS) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GSIW or FUTU or UP or TIGR or PFIS?
On trailing P/E, Peoples Financial Services Corp.
(PFIS) is the cheapest at 10. 0x versus Futu Holdings Limited at 29. 2x. On forward P/E, Futu Holdings Limited is actually cheaper at 1. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Futu Holdings Limited wins at 0. 02x versus Peoples Financial Services Corp. 's 1. 13x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GSIW or FUTU or UP or TIGR or PFIS?
Over the past 5 years, Peoples Financial Services Corp.
(PFIS) delivered a total return of +57. 5%, compared to -99. 7% for Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUTU returned +875. 5% versus UP's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GSIW or FUTU or UP or TIGR or PFIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Peoples Financial Services Corp.
(PFIS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Wheels Up Experience Inc. 's 2. 50β — meaning UP is approximately 203% more volatile than PFIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares (GSIW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 50% for Peoples Financial Services Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GSIW or FUTU or UP or TIGR or PFIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares (GSIW) is pulling ahead at 296.
0% versus -7. 0% for Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Peoples Financial Services Corp. grew EPS 493. 9% year-over-year, compared to 3. 4% for Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GSIW or FUTU or UP or TIGR or PFIS?
Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) is the more profitable company, earning 40.
1% net margin versus -79. 9% for Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 40. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUTU leads at 48. 7% versus -80. 0% for GSIW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUTU leads at 82. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GSIW or FUTU or UP or TIGR or PFIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 02x versus Peoples Financial Services Corp. 's 1. 13x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) trades at 1. 5x forward P/E versus 9. 0x for Peoples Financial Services Corp. — 7. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UP: 7373. 8% to $500. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GSIW or FUTU or UP or TIGR or PFIS?
In this comparison, PFIS (4.
1% yield) pays a dividend. GSIW, FUTU, UP, TIGR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GSIW or FUTU or UP or TIGR or PFIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Peoples Financial Services Corp.
(PFIS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 4. 1% yield). Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP) carries a higher beta of 2. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFIS: +93. 9%, UP: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GSIW and FUTU and UP and TIGR and PFIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (GSIW (Financial Services) and FUTU (Financial Services) and UP (Industrials) and TIGR (Financial Services) and PFIS (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GSIW is a small-cap high-growth stock; FUTU is a mid-cap high-growth stock; UP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TIGR is a small-cap high-growth stock; PFIS is a small-cap high-growth stock. PFIS pays a dividend while GSIW, FUTU, UP, TIGR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.