Restaurants
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GTIM vs FWRG vs DENN vs SHAK vs SYY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
Food Distribution
GTIM vs FWRG vs DENN vs SHAK vs SYY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Food Distribution |
| Market Cap | $14M | $737M | $322M | $2.79B | $34.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $138M | $1.27B | $457M | $1.49B | $83.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $18M | $10M | $41M | $1.74B |
| Gross Margin | 9.9% | 35.1% | 43.8% | 7.5% | 18.5% |
| Operating Margin | 0.4% | 2.3% | 8.4% | 4.3% | 3.6% |
| Forward P/E | 13.4x | 60.7x | 15.0x | 50.2x | 15.9x |
| Total Debt | $42M | $740M | $408M | $902M | $14.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $21M | $2M | $360M | $1.07B |
GTIM vs FWRG vs DENN vs SHAK vs SYY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Good Times Restaura… (GTIM) | 100 | 26.6 | -73.4% |
| First Watch Restaur… (FWRG) | 100 | 55.4 | -44.6% |
| Denny's Corporation (DENN) | 100 | 39.1 | -60.9% |
| Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK) | 100 | 100.1 | +0.1% |
| Sysco Corporation (SYY) | 100 | 94.8 | -5.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GTIM vs FWRG vs DENN vs SHAK vs SYY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GTIM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (13.4x vs 50.2x)
FWRG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 20.3%, EPS growth 3.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.7%
- 20.3% revenue growth vs DENN's -2.5%
DENN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +39.8% vs GTIM's -34.7%
SHAK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 98.2% 10Y total return vs SYY's 82.2%
- 2.8% margin vs GTIM's 0.8%
SYY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 2.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, current ratio 1.21x
- Beta 0.47, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.21x
- Beta 0.47 vs SHAK's 1.75
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.3% revenue growth vs DENN's -2.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.4x vs 50.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.8% margin vs GTIM's 0.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs SHAK's 1.75 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield; 37-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.8% vs GTIM's -34.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs FWRG's 1.0%, ROIC 15.7% vs 1.9% |
GTIM vs FWRG vs DENN vs SHAK vs SYY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GTIM vs FWRG vs DENN vs SHAK vs SYY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SYY leads in 3 of 6 categories
DENN leads 1 • GTIM leads 1 • FWRG leads 0 • SHAK leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DENN leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SYY is the larger business by revenue, generating $83.6B annually — 605.5x GTIM's $138M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.8% (SHAK) to 0.8% (GTIM). On growth, FWRG holds the edge at +17.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $138M | $1.3B | $457M | $1.5B | $83.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $109M | $55M | $173M | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1M | $18M | $10M | $41M | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | -$9M | $2M | $16M | $2.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +35.1% | +43.8% | +7.5% | +18.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | +2.3% | +8.4% | +4.3% | +3.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.8% | +1.4% | +2.2% | +2.8% | +2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | -0.7% | +0.5% | +1.1% | +2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.0% | +17.3% | +1.3% | +14.3% | +4.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.8% | -2.2% | -89.9% | -110.0% | -13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
GTIM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.4x trailing earnings, GTIM trades at a 79% valuation discount to SHAK's 63.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SYY's 11.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SHAK's 17.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $737M | $322M | $2.8B | $34.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $53M | $1.5B | $728M | $3.3B | $48.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.38x | 38.55x | 15.24x | 63.53x | 19.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 60.72x | 15.02x | 50.21x | 15.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.04x | 13.38x | 12.10x | 17.31x | 11.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.10x | 0.60x | 0.71x | 1.93x | 0.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.41x | 1.20x | — | 5.23x | 19.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 350.62x | 49.34x | 19.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY delivers a 80.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $3 for FWRG. FWRG carries lower financial leverage with a 1.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYY's 7.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DENN scores 7/9 vs SYY's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.1% | +2.9% | — | +7.6% | +80.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +1.0% | +2.0% | +2.2% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.3% | +1.9% | +9.7% | +6.0% | +15.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.5% | +2.3% | +11.9% | +5.4% | +19.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.24x | 1.18x | — | 1.63x | 7.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $39M | $718M | $406M | $542M | $13.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $21M | $2M | $360M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $42M | $740M | $408M | $902M | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.75x | 1.64x | 1.73x | 16.87x | 4.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SYY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SYY five years ago would be worth $9,614 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,645 for GTIM. Over the past 12 months, DENN leads with a +39.8% total return vs GTIM's -34.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SYY at 1.3% vs GTIM's -20.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.7% | -22.3% | +0.6% | -17.0% | +1.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -34.7% | -25.3% | +39.8% | -32.1% | +6.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.2% | -28.9% | -41.3% | +3.5% | +4.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.6% | -46.0% | -64.9% | -22.6% | -3.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.7% | -46.0% | -42.9% | +98.2% | +82.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.7% | -10.7% | -16.3% | +1.1% | +1.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DENN and SYY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SYY is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHAK's 1.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DENN currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs SHAK's 47.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.50x | 1.59x | 0.65x | 1.75x | 0.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.09 | $19.53 | $6.26 | $144.65 | $91.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.10 | $10.10 | $3.36 | $67.20 | $68.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.2% | +61.2% | +99.8% | +47.9% | +79.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.5 | 46.5 | 66.9 | 48.0 | 41.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 26K | 1.6M | 0 | 1.5M | 4.7M |
Analyst Outlook
SYY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FWRG as "Buy", DENN as "Buy", SHAK as "Hold", SYY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 74.6% upside for SHAK (target: $121) vs -4.0% for DENN (target: $6). SYY is the only dividend payer here at 2.80% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $19.00 | $6.00 | $120.89 | $90.44 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 21 | 35 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.9% | 0.0% | +3.6% | 0.0% | +3.6% |
SYY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). DENN leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
GTIM vs FWRG vs DENN vs SHAK vs SYY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GTIM or FWRG or DENN or SHAK or SYY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc.
(FWRG) is the stronger pick with 20. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 5% for Denny's Corporation (DENN). Good Times Restaurants Inc. (GTIM) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc. (FWRG) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GTIM or FWRG or DENN or SHAK or SYY?
On trailing P/E, Good Times Restaurants Inc.
(GTIM) is the cheapest at 13. 4x versus Shake Shack Inc. at 63. 5x. On forward P/E, Denny's Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GTIM or FWRG or DENN or SHAK or SYY?
Over the past 5 years, Sysco Corporation (SYY) delivered a total return of -3.
9%, compared to -73. 6% for Good Times Restaurants Inc. (GTIM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHAK returned +98. 2% versus GTIM's -63. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GTIM or FWRG or DENN or SHAK or SYY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
47β versus Shake Shack Inc. 's 1. 75β — meaning SHAK is approximately 273% more volatile than SYY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc. (FWRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 118% versus 8% for Sysco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GTIM or FWRG or DENN or SHAK or SYY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc.
(FWRG) is pulling ahead at 20. 3% versus -2. 5% for Denny's Corporation (DENN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Shake Shack Inc. grew EPS 354. 2% year-over-year, compared to -31. 6% for Good Times Restaurants Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FWRG leads at 18. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GTIM or FWRG or DENN or SHAK or SYY?
Denny's Corporation (DENN) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
8% net margin versus 0. 7% for Good Times Restaurants Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DENN leads at 10. 0% versus 0. 2% for GTIM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DENN leads at 73. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GTIM or FWRG or DENN or SHAK or SYY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Denny's Corporation (DENN) trades at 15.
0x forward P/E versus 60. 7x for First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc. — 45. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHAK: 74. 6% to $120. 89.
08Which pays a better dividend — GTIM or FWRG or DENN or SHAK or SYY?
In this comparison, SYY (2.
8% yield) pays a dividend. GTIM, FWRG, DENN, SHAK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GTIM or FWRG or DENN or SHAK or SYY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
47), 2. 8% yield). Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK) carries a higher beta of 1. 75 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SYY: +82. 2%, SHAK: +98. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GTIM and FWRG and DENN and SHAK and SYY?
These companies operate in different sectors (GTIM (Consumer Cyclical) and FWRG (Consumer Cyclical) and DENN (Consumer Cyclical) and SHAK (Consumer Cyclical) and SYY (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GTIM is a small-cap deep-value stock; FWRG is a small-cap high-growth stock; DENN is a small-cap deep-value stock; SHAK is a small-cap high-growth stock; SYY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SYY pays a dividend while GTIM, FWRG, DENN, SHAK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.