Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GTX vs THRM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
GTX vs THRM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $5.09B | $944M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.71B | $1.53B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $343M | $23M |
| Gross Margin | 31.6% | 23.6% |
| Operating Margin | 13.4% | 4.7% |
| Forward P/E | 15.2x | 11.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.51B | $295M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $179M | $161M |
GTX vs THRM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) | 100 | 522.8 | +422.8% |
| Gentherm Incorporat… (THRM) | 100 | 75.7 | -24.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GTX vs THRM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GTX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.51, yield 0.9%
- Rev growth 3.1%, EPS growth 20.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.2%
- 42.7% 10Y total return vs THRM's -14.9%
THRM is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.43, Low D/E 40.9%, current ratio 1.92x
- Beta 1.43, current ratio 1.92x
- Lower P/E (11.6x vs 15.2x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.1% revenue growth vs THRM's 2.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.6x vs 15.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.7% margin vs THRM's 1.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.43 vs GTX's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +141.3% vs THRM's +19.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.3% ROA vs THRM's 1.6%, ROIC 59.1% vs 7.3% |
GTX vs THRM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GTX vs THRM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GTX leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GTX is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.7B annually — 1.8x THRM's $1.5B. GTX is the more profitable business, keeping 12.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to THRM's 1.5%. On growth, THRM holds the edge at +11.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.7B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $440M | $127M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $343M | $23M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $409M | $79M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.6% | +23.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +4.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.7% | +1.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.1% | +5.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +11.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +63.3% | — |
Valuation Metrics
THRM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.8x trailing earnings, GTX trades at a 65% valuation discount to THRM's 51.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, THRM's 8.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GTX's 10.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.1B | $944M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.4B | $1.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.78x | 51.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.24x | 11.57x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.32x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.84x | 8.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.42x | 0.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.93x | 15.45x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GTX leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GTX scores 7/9 vs THRM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +3.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.3% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +59.1% | +7.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +49.3% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | $134M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $179M | $161M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $295M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.60x | 5.83x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GTX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GTX five years ago would be worth $48,187 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,200 for THRM. Over the past 12 months, GTX leads with a +141.3% total return vs THRM's +19.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GTX at 50.2% vs THRM's -19.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +56.0% | -16.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +141.3% | +19.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +238.7% | -48.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +381.9% | -58.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.7% | -14.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +50.2% | -19.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GTX and THRM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
THRM is the less volatile stock with a 1.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GTX's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTX currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs THRM's 78.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.51x | 1.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.79 | $39.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.57 | $25.47 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.3% | +78.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 80.4 | 59.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 239K |
Analyst Outlook
GTX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GTX as "Hold" and THRM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.0% upside for THRM (target: $37) vs -16.8% for GTX (target: $23). GTX is the only dividend payer here at 0.94% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.50 | $36.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.26 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.1% | +1.1% |
GTX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). THRM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
GTX vs THRM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GTX or THRM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Garrett Motion Inc.
(GTX) is the stronger pick with 3. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 6% for Gentherm Incorporated (THRM). Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) offers the better valuation at 17. 8x trailing P/E (15. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GTX or THRM?
On trailing P/E, Garrett Motion Inc.
(GTX) is the cheapest at 17. 8x versus Gentherm Incorporated at 51. 4x. On forward P/E, Gentherm Incorporated is actually cheaper at 11. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GTX or THRM?
Over the past 5 years, Garrett Motion Inc.
(GTX) delivered a total return of +381. 9%, compared to -58. 0% for Gentherm Incorporated (THRM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTX returned +42. 7% versus THRM's -14. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GTX or THRM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
43β versus Garrett Motion Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning GTX is approximately 6% more volatile than THRM relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — GTX or THRM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Garrett Motion Inc.
(GTX) is pulling ahead at 3. 1% versus 2. 6% for Gentherm Incorporated (THRM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Garrett Motion Inc. grew EPS 20. 6% year-over-year, compared to -70. 9% for Gentherm Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, THRM leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GTX or THRM?
Garrett Motion Inc.
(GTX) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 6% net margin versus 1. 2% for Gentherm Incorporated — meaning it keeps 8. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GTX leads at 13. 8% versus 5. 2% for THRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GTX leads at 24. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GTX or THRM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) trades at 11.
6x forward P/E versus 15. 2x for Garrett Motion Inc. — 3. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for THRM: 19. 0% to $36. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — GTX or THRM?
In this comparison, GTX (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. THRM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GTX or THRM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Garrett Motion Inc.
(GTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTX: +42. 7%, THRM: -14. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GTX and THRM?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GTX is a small-cap deep-value stock; THRM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. GTX pays a dividend while THRM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.