GVH vs BTBT vs MARA vs AIXI

For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 0% for Globavend Holdings Limited (GVH). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the cheapest at 9. 2x versus Globavend Holdings Limited at 45. 8x.

Over the past 5 years, Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

(MARA) delivered a total return of -59. 5%, compared to -99. 2% for Globavend Holdings Limited (GVH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MARA returned -51. 6% versus GVH's -99. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Globavend Holdings Limited (GVH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

27β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately 1142% more volatile than GVH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Globavend Holdings Limited (GVH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -11. 0% for Globavend Holdings Limited (GVH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -314. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIXI leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -144. 6% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -90. 6% for MARA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AIXI leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, BTBT (0.

3% yield) pays a dividend. GVH, MARA, AIXI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Globavend Holdings Limited (GVH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

27)). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GVH: -99. 2%, BTBT: -60. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (GVH (Industrials) and BTBT (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services) and AIXI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: GVH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; AIXI is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.