Travel Lodging
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
H vs MAR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Lodging
H vs MAR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Travel Lodging | Travel Lodging |
| Market Cap | $16.18B | $95.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.22B | $21.73B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-34M | $2.58B |
| Gross Margin | 17.6% | 6.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.2% | 19.6% |
| Forward P/E | 52.6x | 31.0x |
| Total Debt | $4.80B | $17.08B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $788M | $358M |
H vs MAR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyatt Hotels Corpor… (H) | 100 | 307.4 | +207.4% |
| Marriott Internatio… (MAR) | 100 | 405.7 | +305.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: H vs MAR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
H is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 117.0%, EPS growth -104.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.8%
- 117.0% revenue growth vs MAR's 4.3%
MAR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.09, yield 0.7%
- 440.0% 10Y total return vs H's 254.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.09, current ratio 0.43x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 117.0% revenue growth vs MAR's 4.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (31.0x vs 52.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.9% margin vs H's -0.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs H's 1.39 | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs H's 0.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.6% vs H's +39.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.5% ROA vs H's -0.2%, ROIC 25.0% vs 5.8% |
H vs MAR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
H vs MAR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAR is the larger business by revenue, generating $21.7B annually — 3.5x H's $6.2B. MAR is the more profitable business, keeping 11.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to H's -0.5%. On growth, H holds the edge at +108.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.2B | $21.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $899M | $4.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$34M | $2.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $63M | $3.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.6% | +6.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | +19.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | +11.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.0% | +14.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +108.7% | -71.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +95.0% | +110.6% |
Valuation Metrics
H leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, H's 22.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MAR's 25.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $16.2B | $95.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20.2B | $111.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -313.65x | 37.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 52.64x | 31.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.79x | 25.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.26x | 3.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.42x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 101.73x | 36.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MAR leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MAR scores 7/9 vs H's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.9% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.2% | +10.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.8% | +25.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.7% | +22.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.31x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.0B | $16.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $788M | $358M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.8B | $17.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.28x | 8.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MAR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MAR five years ago would be worth $25,790 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $21,703 for H. Over the past 12 months, MAR leads with a +43.6% total return vs H's +39.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MAR at 27.2% vs H's 13.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.4% | +14.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.8% | +43.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.3% | +105.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +117.0% | +157.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +254.3% | +440.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.3% | +27.2% |
Risk & Volatility
MAR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MAR is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than H's 1.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.39x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $180.53 | $380.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $120.36 | $250.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.8% | +94.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.5 | 50.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 784K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
MAR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates H as "Hold" and MAR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 12.7% upside for H (target: $191) vs 3.7% for MAR (target: $373). For income investors, MAR offers the higher dividend yield at 0.74% vs H's 0.35%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $190.80 | $372.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 49 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.60 | $2.67 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | +3.5% |
MAR leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). H leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
H vs MAR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is H or MAR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H) is the stronger pick with 117.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) offers the better valuation at 37. 8x trailing P/E (31. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H) a "Hold" — based on 49 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — H or MAR?
On forward P/E, Marriott International, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 31. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — H or MAR?
Over the past 5 years, Marriott International, Inc.
(MAR) delivered a total return of +157. 9%, compared to +117. 0% for Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MAR returned +440. 0% versus H's +254. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — H or MAR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Marriott International, Inc.
(MAR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 09β versus Hyatt Hotels Corporation's 1. 39β — meaning H is approximately 28% more volatile than MAR relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — H or MAR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H) is pulling ahead at 117.
0% versus 4. 3% for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Marriott International, Inc. grew EPS 13. 9% year-over-year, compared to -104. 3% for Hyatt Hotels Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, H leads at 29. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — H or MAR?
Marriott International, Inc.
(MAR) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 9% net margin versus -0. 7% for Hyatt Hotels Corporation — meaning it keeps 9. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MAR leads at 15. 8% versus 7. 8% for H. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MAR leads at 21. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is H or MAR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Marriott International, Inc.
(MAR) trades at 31. 0x forward P/E versus 52. 6x for Hyatt Hotels Corporation — 21. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for H: 12. 7% to $190. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — H or MAR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) offers the highest yield at 0. 7%, versus 0. 4% for Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H).
09Is H or MAR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Marriott International, Inc.
(MAR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), 0. 7% yield, +440. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MAR: +440. 0%, H: +254. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between H and MAR?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: H is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MAR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MAR pays a dividend while H does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.