HBT vs CHMG

For growth investors, HBT Financial, Inc.

(HBT) is the stronger pick with 2. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 5% for Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG). HBT Financial, Inc. (HBT) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate HBT Financial, Inc. (HBT) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, HBT Financial, Inc.

(HBT) is the cheapest at 11. 5x versus Chemung Financial Corporation at 21. 7x. On forward P/E, Chemung Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, HBT Financial, Inc.

(HBT) delivered a total return of +73. 9%, compared to +69. 5% for Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHMG returned +158. 1% versus HBT's +110. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

70β versus HBT Financial, Inc. 's 0. 77β — meaning HBT is approximately 10% more volatile than CHMG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 11% for HBT Financial, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), HBT Financial, Inc.

(HBT) is pulling ahead at 2. 8% versus -6. 5% for Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HBT Financial, Inc. grew EPS 8. 0% year-over-year, compared to -36. 9% for Chemung Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

HBT Financial, Inc.

(HBT) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 3% net margin versus 10. 8% for Chemung Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 26. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HBT leads at 35. 6% versus 14. 2% for CHMG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HBT leads at 80. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) trades at 9.

5x forward P/E versus 9. 6x for HBT Financial, Inc. — 0. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HBT: 10. 0% to $31. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

HBT Financial, Inc. (HBT) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 1. 9% for Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

70), 1. 9% yield, +158. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHMG: +158. 1%, HBT: +110. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: HBT is a small-cap deep-value stock; CHMG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.