Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HBT vs CHMG vs CZWI vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
HBT vs CHMG vs CZWI vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $885M | $327M | $198M | $2.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $293M | $140M | $90M | $867M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $77M | $15M | $14M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 80.0% | 64.2% | 54.7% | 72.1% |
| Operating Margin | 35.6% | 14.2% | 7.0% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 9.6x | 9.5x | 11.3x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $65M | $5M | $52M | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24M | $23M | $119M | $185M |
HBT vs CHMG vs CZWI vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| HBT Financial, Inc. (HBT) | 100 | 221.5 | +121.5% |
| Chemung Financial C… (CHMG) | 100 | 268.5 | +168.5% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 279.5 | +179.5% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 145.5 | +45.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HBT vs CHMG vs CZWI vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 0.75 vs CZWI's 2.22
- NIM 3.9% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- Lower P/E (9.6x vs 10.9x), PEG 0.75 vs 1.55
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CHMG's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
CHMG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 158.1% 10Y total return vs HBT's 110.7%
- +43.3% vs NBTB's +7.6%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50 vs NBTB's 0.85
NBTB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.85, yield 3.1%
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- 3.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 10.9x), PEG 0.75 vs 1.55 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CHMG's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs NBTB's 0.85 | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.3% vs NBTB's +7.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CHMG's 0.5% |
HBT vs CHMG vs CZWI vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HBT vs CHMG vs CZWI vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HBT leads in 3 of 6 categories
CHMG leads 1 • NBTB leads 1 • CZWI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HBT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 9.6x CZWI's $90M. HBT is the more profitable business, keeping 26.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CHMG's 10.8%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $293M | $140M | $90M | $867M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $110M | $22M | $9M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $77M | $15M | $14M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $193M | $47M | $11M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.0% | +64.2% | +54.7% | +72.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +35.6% | +14.2% | +7.0% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.3% | +10.8% | +16.0% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.9% | +1.4% | +11.5% | +25.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.3% | +29.8% | +63.0% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
HBT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.5x trailing earnings, HBT trades at a 47% valuation discount to CHMG's 21.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HBT offers better value at 0.91x vs CZWI's 2.77x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $885M | $327M | $198M | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $926M | $309M | $131M | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.55x | 21.72x | 14.07x | 13.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.59x | 9.51x | 11.29x | 10.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.91x | — | 2.77x | 1.94x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.45x | 15.51x | 14.69x | 10.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.02x | 2.34x | 2.20x | 2.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.44x | 1.28x | 1.06x | 1.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.13x | 161.46x | 19.05x | 10.87x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HBT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HBT delivers a 13.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $6 for CHMG. CHMG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CZWI's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HBT scores 9/9 vs CHMG's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.0% | +6.3% | +7.8% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +0.5% | +0.8% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.5% | +5.0% | +2.0% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.7% | +5.6% | +0.6% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 0.02x | 0.28x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $41M | -$18M | -$67M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24M | $23M | $119M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $65M | $5M | $52M | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.84x | 0.44x | 0.16x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CHMG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HBT five years ago would be worth $17,385 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,056 for NBTB. Over the past 12 months, CHMG leads with a +43.3% total return vs NBTB's +7.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 38.0% vs NBTB's 12.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.4% | +25.4% | +19.0% | +10.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.1% | +43.3% | +36.5% | +7.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.2% | +107.8% | +162.9% | +40.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.9% | +69.5% | +63.4% | +30.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.7% | +158.1% | +152.2% | +100.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.2% | +27.6% | +38.0% | +12.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CZWI and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs CZWI's 90.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 0.70x | 0.50x | 0.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.88 | $70.83 | $22.62 | $46.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.36 | $43.20 | $12.83 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.3% | +96.0% | +90.8% | +97.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.7 | 59.3 | 42.5 | 53.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 70K | 18K | 34K | 251K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HBT as "Buy", CHMG as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 10.0% upside for HBT (target: $31) vs -26.5% for CHMG (target: $50). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.13% vs CZWI's 1.80%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.00 | $50.00 | — | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 7 | 2 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.0% | +1.9% | +1.8% | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 0 | 7 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.85 | $1.31 | $0.37 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | 0.0% | +3.2% | +0.4% |
HBT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CHMG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
HBT vs CHMG vs CZWI vs NBTB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HBT or CHMG or CZWI or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). HBT Financial, Inc. (HBT) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate HBT Financial, Inc. (HBT) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HBT or CHMG or CZWI or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, HBT Financial, Inc.
(HBT) is the cheapest at 11. 5x versus Chemung Financial Corporation at 21. 7x. On forward P/E, Chemung Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: HBT Financial, Inc. wins at 0. 75x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 22x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HBT or CHMG or CZWI or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, HBT Financial, Inc.
(HBT) delivered a total return of +73. 9%, compared to +30. 6% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHMG returned +158. 1% versus NBTB's +100. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HBT or CHMG or CZWI or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 85β — meaning NBTB is approximately 69% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 28% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HBT or CHMG or CZWI or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NBT Bancorp Inc. grew EPS 12. 5% year-over-year, compared to -36. 9% for Chemung Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HBT or CHMG or CZWI or NBTB?
HBT Financial, Inc.
(HBT) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 3% net margin versus 10. 8% for Chemung Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 26. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HBT leads at 35. 6% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HBT leads at 80. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HBT or CHMG or CZWI or NBTB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, HBT Financial, Inc. (HBT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 22x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 3x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 1. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HBT: 10. 0% to $31. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HBT or CHMG or CZWI or NBTB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 1%, versus 1. 8% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is HBT or CHMG or CZWI or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50), 1. 8% yield, +152. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +152. 2%, NBTB: +100. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HBT and CHMG and CZWI and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HBT is a small-cap deep-value stock; CHMG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.