Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HBT vs MOFG vs CZWI vs MVBF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
HBT vs MOFG vs CZWI vs MVBF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $885M | $1.02B | $198M | $327M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $293M | $206M | $90M | $270M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $77M | $58M | $14M | $27M |
| Gross Margin | 80.0% | 29.4% | 54.7% | 71.7% |
| Operating Margin | 35.6% | -40.8% | 7.0% | 13.6% |
| Forward P/E | 9.6x | 13.8x | 11.3x | 15.3x |
| Total Debt | $65M | $117M | $52M | $77M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24M | $205M | $119M | $244M |
HBT vs MOFG vs CZWI vs MVBF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| HBT Financial, Inc. (HBT) | 100 | 221.5 | +121.5% |
| MidWestOne Financia… (MOFG) | 100 | 241.4 | +141.4% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 279.5 | +179.5% |
| MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) | 100 | 179.4 | +79.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HBT vs MOFG vs CZWI vs MVBF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.77, yield 3.0%
- PEG 0.75 vs CZWI's 2.22
- NIM 3.9% vs MOFG's 2.5%
- Lower P/E (9.6x vs 11.3x), PEG 0.75 vs 2.22
MOFG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +68.5% vs HBT's +18.1%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 152.2% 10Y total return vs HBT's 110.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50 vs MOFG's 1.37
MVBF is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 34.6%
- 19.0% NII/revenue growth vs MOFG's -23.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.0% NII/revenue growth vs MOFG's -23.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 11.3x), PEG 0.75 vs 2.22 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs MOFG's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs MOFG's 1.37 | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +68.5% vs HBT's +18.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs MOFG's 0.7% |
HBT vs MOFG vs CZWI vs MVBF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HBT vs MOFG vs CZWI vs MVBF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HBT leads in 2 of 6 categories
MOFG leads 1 • CZWI leads 0 • MVBF leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HBT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HBT is the larger business by revenue, generating $293M annually — 3.3x CZWI's $90M. HBT is the more profitable business, keeping 26.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MOFG's -29.3%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $293M | $206M | $90M | $270M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $110M | $74M | $9M | $39M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $77M | $58M | $14M | $27M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $193M | $79M | $11M | $2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.0% | +29.4% | +54.7% | +71.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +35.6% | -40.8% | +7.0% | +13.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.3% | -29.3% | +16.0% | +10.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.9% | +29.5% | +11.5% | +0.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.3% | +113.6% | +63.0% | -55.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HBT and MVBF each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.5x trailing earnings, HBT trades at a 18% valuation discount to CZWI's 14.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HBT offers better value at 0.91x vs CZWI's 2.77x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $885M | $1.0B | $198M | $327M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $926M | $929M | $131M | $160M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.55x | -13.93x | 14.07x | 12.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.59x | 13.77x | 11.29x | 15.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.91x | — | 2.77x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.45x | — | 14.69x | 4.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.02x | 4.94x | 2.20x | 1.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.44x | 1.50x | 1.06x | 1.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.13x | 16.74x | 19.05x | 154.83x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HBT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HBT delivers a 13.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. HBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CZWI's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HBT scores 9/9 vs MOFG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.0% | +10.0% | +7.8% | +8.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +0.9% | +0.8% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.5% | -9.4% | +2.0% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.7% | -9.5% | +0.6% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 0.21x | 0.28x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $41M | -$88M | -$67M | -$167M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24M | $205M | $119M | $244M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $65M | $117M | $52M | $77M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.84x | 0.67x | 0.16x | 0.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MOFG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HBT five years ago would be worth $17,385 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,929 for MVBF. Over the past 12 months, MOFG leads with a +68.5% total return vs HBT's +18.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MOFG at 39.0% vs MVBF's 17.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.4% | +30.2% | +19.0% | +0.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.1% | +68.5% | +36.5% | +35.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.2% | +168.5% | +162.9% | +61.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.9% | +70.9% | +63.4% | -30.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.7% | +103.6% | +152.2% | +132.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.2% | +39.0% | +38.0% | +17.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MOFG and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MOFG's 1.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MOFG currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs MVBF's 86.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 1.37x | 0.50x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.88 | $49.69 | $22.62 | $29.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.36 | $26.52 | $12.83 | $18.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.3% | +99.2% | +90.8% | +86.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.7 | 74.9 | 42.5 | 44.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 70K | 0 | 34K | 34K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HBT and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HBT as "Buy", MOFG as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", MVBF as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 17.8% upside for MVBF (target: $30) vs -36.6% for MOFG (target: $31). For income investors, HBT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.00% vs CZWI's 1.80%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.00 | $31.25 | — | $30.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 8 | 2 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.0% | +2.0% | +1.8% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 5 | 7 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.85 | $0.97 | $0.37 | $0.66 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +0.0% | +3.2% | +3.1% |
HBT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MOFG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
HBT vs MOFG vs CZWI vs MVBF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HBT or MOFG or CZWI or MVBF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MVB Financial Corp.
(MVBF) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). HBT Financial, Inc. (HBT) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate HBT Financial, Inc. (HBT) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HBT or MOFG or CZWI or MVBF?
On trailing P/E, HBT Financial, Inc.
(HBT) is the cheapest at 11. 5x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. at 14. 1x. On forward P/E, HBT Financial, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: HBT Financial, Inc. wins at 0. 75x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 22x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HBT or MOFG or CZWI or MVBF?
Over the past 5 years, HBT Financial, Inc.
(HBT) delivered a total return of +73. 9%, compared to -30. 7% for MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +152. 2% versus MOFG's +103. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HBT or MOFG or CZWI or MVBF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. 's 1. 37β — meaning MOFG is approximately 173% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, HBT Financial, Inc. (HBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 28% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HBT or MOFG or CZWI or MVBF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MVB Financial Corp.
(MVBF) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MVB Financial Corp. grew EPS 34. 6% year-over-year, compared to -366. 2% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HBT or MOFG or CZWI or MVBF?
HBT Financial, Inc.
(HBT) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 3% net margin versus -29. 3% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HBT leads at 35. 6% versus -40. 8% for MOFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HBT leads at 80. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HBT or MOFG or CZWI or MVBF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, HBT Financial, Inc. (HBT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 22x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, HBT Financial, Inc. (HBT) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 15. 3x for MVB Financial Corp. — 5. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MVBF: 17. 8% to $30. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HBT or MOFG or CZWI or MVBF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
HBT Financial, Inc. (HBT) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 1. 8% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is HBT or MOFG or CZWI or MVBF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50), 1. 8% yield, +152. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +152. 2%, MOFG: +103. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HBT and MOFG and CZWI and MVBF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HBT is a small-cap deep-value stock; MOFG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; MVBF is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.