HCAI
Hauchen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$13M
5Y Perf.-91.3%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
HCAI vs AIXI vs AEYE vs GFAI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
AIXI
Xiao-I Corporation
Software - Application
Market Cap$6M
5Y Perf.-86.9%
AEYE
AudioEye, Inc.
Software - Application
Market Cap$98M
5Y Perf.-39.6%
GFAI
Guardforce AI Co., Limited
Security & Protection Services
Market Cap$11M
5Y Perf.-55.7%
HCAI vs AIXI vs AEYE vs GFAI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | HCAI | AIXI | AEYE | GFAI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Software - Application | Software - Application | Security & Protection Services |
| Market Cap | $13M | $6M | $98M | $11M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $41M | $115M | $40M | $72M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $-53M | $-3M | $-24M |
| Gross Margin | 14.0% | 64.3% | 78.3% | 15.1% |
| Operating Margin | 5.5% | -44.2% | -7.9% | -27.4% |
| Forward P/E | 8.0x | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $12M | $46M | $721K | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29K | $847K | $5M | $22M |
HCAI vs AIXI vs AEYE vs GFAI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
HCAI
AIXI
AEYE
GFAI
| Stock | Feb 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hauchen AI Parking … (HCAI) | 100 | 8.7 | -91.3% |
| Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) | 100 | 13.1 | -86.9% |
| AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) | 100 | 60.4 | -39.6% |
| Guardforce AI Co., … (GFAI) | 100 | 44.3 | -55.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HCAI vs AIXI vs AEYE vs GFAI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: HCAI leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. AudioEye, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
HCAI
Hauchen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
The Income Pick
HCAI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.34
- Rev growth 19.4%, EPS growth -4.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 69.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.34, Low D/E 41.5%, current ratio 2.58x
- Beta 0.34, current ratio 2.58x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
AIXI
Xiao-I Corporation
The Lower-Volatility Pick
AIXI plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
Best for: technology exposure
AEYE
AudioEye, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
AEYE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 96.5% 10Y total return vs HCAI's -89.6%
- -34.1% vs HCAI's -94.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
GFAI
Guardforce AI Co., Limited
The Secondary Option
GFAI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: industrials exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | HCAI | 19.4% revenue growth vs GFAI's 0.2% |
| Quality / Margins | HCAI | 3.7% margin vs AIXI's -45.9% |
| Stability / Safety | HCAI | Beta 0.34 vs GFAI's 2.36 |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | AEYE | -34.1% vs HCAI's -94.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | HCAI | 3.0% ROA vs AIXI's -65.3%, ROIC 4.2% vs -34.4% |
HCAI vs AIXI vs AEYE vs GFAI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2024
FY 2024
Segment breakdown not available.
HCAI vs AIXI vs AEYE vs GFAI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLAEYELAGGINGGFAI
Who Leads Where
AEYE leads in 2 of 6 categories
HCAI leads 1 • AIXI leads 0 • GFAI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓GFAIGuardforce AI Co., Li…
0leads
AIXIXiao-I Corporation
0leads
HCAIHauchen AI Parking Ma…
1leads
AEYEAudioEye, Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs HCAIvs AIXIMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
AEYE3/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
HCAI6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
AEYE5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AEYE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AIXI is the larger business by revenue, generating $115M annually — 2.8x AEYE's $40M. HCAI is the more profitable business, keeping 3.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AIXI's -45.9%. On growth, AEYE holds the edge at +7.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | HCAIHauchen AI Parkin… | AIXIXiao-I Corporation | AEYEAudioEye, Inc. | GFAIGuardforce AI Co.… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $41M | $115M | $40M | $72M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$49M | -$504,000 | -$12M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$53M | -$3M | -$24M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$2M | $2M | -$6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +64.3% | +78.3% | +15.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | -44.2% | -7.9% | -27.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | -45.9% | -7.6% | -32.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | -2.0% | +5.5% | -8.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -72.8% | -64.9% | +7.9% | +3.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -62.7% | -29.9% | +29.0% | +38.9% |
AEYE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AIXI and AEYE and GFAI each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | HCAIHauchen AI Parkin… | AIXIXiao-I Corporation | AEYEAudioEye, Inc. | GFAIGuardforce AI Co.… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13M | $6M | $98M | $11M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25M | $51M | $93M | -$8M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.03x | -0.38x | -31.44x | -0.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.96x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.32x | 0.09x | 2.42x | 0.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.43x | — | 20.31x | 0.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.63x | — | — | — |
Evenly matched — AIXI and AEYE and GFAI each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HCAI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HCAI delivers a 5.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-70 for GFAI. GFAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HCAI's 0.42x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HCAI scores 7/9 vs AEYE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | HCAIHauchen AI Parkin… | AIXIXiao-I Corporation | AEYEAudioEye, Inc. | GFAIGuardforce AI Co.… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.5% | — | -47.8% | -69.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | -65.3% | -9.5% | -50.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.2% | -34.4% | -42.4% | -41.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.0% | -3.4% | -17.7% | -19.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.42x | — | 0.15x | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12M | $45M | -$5M | -$19M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $28,654 | $846,593 | $5M | $22M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $46M | $721,000 | $3M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.00x | -14.13x | -2.79x | -167.24x |
HCAI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AEYE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AEYE five years ago would be worth $4,233 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $50 for GFAI. Over the past 12 months, AEYE leads with a -34.1% total return vs HCAI's -94.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AEYE at 5.4% vs AIXI's -77.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | HCAIHauchen AI Parkin… | AIXIXiao-I Corporation | AEYEAudioEye, Inc. | GFAIGuardforce AI Co.… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +33.8% | +41.9% | -21.0% | -20.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -94.7% | -83.7% | -34.1% | -51.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.6% | -98.8% | +17.1% | -93.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.6% | -98.8% | -57.7% | -99.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.6% | -98.8% | +96.5% | -99.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -52.9% | -77.2% | +5.4% | -59.4% |
AEYE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HCAI and AEYE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HCAI is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GFAI's 2.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AEYE currently trades 48.0% from its 52-week high vs HCAI's 3.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | HCAIHauchen AI Parkin… | AIXIXiao-I Corporation | AEYEAudioEye, Inc. | GFAIGuardforce AI Co.… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.34x | 0.71x | 2.18x | 2.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $318.60 | $4.02 | $16.39 | $1.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.32 | $0.08 | $5.31 | $0.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.8% | +15.2% | +48.0% | +33.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.5 | 48.5 | 66.5 | 43.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 60.7M | 195K | 315K |
Evenly matched — HCAI and AEYE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | HCAIHauchen AI Parkin… | AIXIXiao-I Corporation | AEYEAudioEye, Inc. | GFAIGuardforce AI Co.… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
AEYE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). HCAI leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
Best OverallAudioEye, Inc. (AEYE)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
HCAI vs AIXI vs AEYE vs GFAI: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HCAI or AIXI or AEYE or GFAI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hauchen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (HCAI) is the stronger pick with 19. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 2% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI). Hauchen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. (HCAI) offers the better valuation at 8. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HCAI or AIXI or AEYE or GFAI?
Over the past 5 years, AudioEye, Inc.
(AEYE) delivered a total return of -57. 7%, compared to -99. 5% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEYE returned +96. 5% versus GFAI's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HCAI or AIXI or AEYE or GFAI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hauchen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (HCAI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus Guardforce AI Co. , Limited's 2. 36β — meaning GFAI is approximately 598% more volatile than HCAI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 42% for Hauchen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — HCAI or AIXI or AEYE or GFAI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hauchen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (HCAI) is pulling ahead at 19. 4% versus 0. 2% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guardforce AI Co. , Limited grew EPS 88. 3% year-over-year, compared to -4. 2% for Hauchen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co. , Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HCAI leads at 69. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — HCAI or AIXI or AEYE or GFAI?
Hauchen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (HCAI) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 7% net margin versus -20. 6% for Xiao-I Corporation — meaning it keeps 3. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HCAI leads at 5. 5% versus -18. 5% for GFAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEYE leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — HCAI or AIXI or AEYE or GFAI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is HCAI or AIXI or AEYE or GFAI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hauchen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (HCAI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34)). Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HCAI: -89. 6%, GFAI: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between HCAI and AIXI and AEYE and GFAI?
These companies operate in different sectors (HCAI (Industrials) and AIXI (Technology) and AEYE (Technology) and GFAI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HCAI is a small-cap high-growth stock; AIXI is a small-cap high-growth stock; AEYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GFAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(HCAI: -72.8% · AIXI: -64.9%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.