Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HCAI vs AIXI vs AEYE vs GFAI vs BBAI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Security & Protection Services
Information Technology Services
HCAI vs AIXI vs AEYE vs GFAI vs BBAI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Software - Application | Software - Application | Security & Protection Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $13M | $6M | $98M | $11M | $19.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $41M | $115M | $40M | $72M | $127M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $-53M | $-3M | $-24M | $-289M |
| Gross Margin | 14.0% | 64.3% | 78.3% | 15.1% | 25.8% |
| Operating Margin | 5.5% | -44.2% | -7.9% | -27.4% | -68.3% |
| Forward P/E | 8.0x | — | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $12M | $46M | $721K | $3M | $24M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29K | $847K | $5M | $22M | $87M |
HCAI vs AIXI vs AEYE vs GFAI vs BBAI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hauchen AI Parking … (HCAI) | 100 | 8.7 | -91.3% |
| Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) | 100 | 13.1 | -86.9% |
| AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) | 100 | 60.4 | -39.6% |
| Guardforce AI Co., … (GFAI) | 100 | 44.3 | -55.7% |
| BigBear.ai Holdings… (BBAI) | 100 | 81.0 | -19.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HCAI vs AIXI vs AEYE vs GFAI vs BBAI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HCAI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.34, Low D/E 41.5%, current ratio 2.58x
- Beta 0.34, current ratio 2.58x
- 19.4% revenue growth vs BBAI's -19.3%
- 3.7% margin vs BBAI's -226.7%
AIXI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 52.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.3%
AEYE is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 96.5% 10Y total return vs BBAI's -57.5%
Among these 5 stocks, GFAI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BBAI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 3.31
- +28.6% vs HCAI's -94.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.4% revenue growth vs BBAI's -19.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.7% margin vs BBAI's -226.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs BBAI's 3.31 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.6% vs HCAI's -94.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.0% ROA vs AIXI's -65.3%, ROIC 4.2% vs -34.4% |
HCAI vs AIXI vs AEYE vs GFAI vs BBAI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HCAI vs AIXI vs AEYE vs GFAI vs BBAI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BBAI leads in 2 of 6 categories
AEYE leads 1 • HCAI leads 1 • AIXI leads 0 • GFAI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AEYE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BBAI is the larger business by revenue, generating $127M annually — 3.2x AEYE's $40M. HCAI is the more profitable business, keeping 3.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BBAI's -2.3%. On growth, AEYE holds the edge at +7.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $41M | $115M | $40M | $72M | $127M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$49M | -$504,000 | -$12M | -$75M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$53M | -$3M | -$24M | -$289M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$2M | $2M | -$6M | -$56M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +64.3% | +78.3% | +15.1% | +25.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | -44.2% | -7.9% | -27.4% | -68.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | -45.9% | -7.6% | -32.9% | -2.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | -2.0% | +5.5% | -8.8% | -44.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -72.8% | -64.9% | +7.9% | +3.6% | -0.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -62.7% | -29.9% | +29.0% | +38.9% | +52.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AIXI and AEYE and GFAI each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13M | $6M | $98M | $11M | $19.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25M | $51M | $93M | -$8M | $19.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.03x | -0.38x | -31.44x | -0.96x | -5.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.96x | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.32x | 0.09x | 2.42x | 0.31x | 154.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.43x | — | 20.31x | 0.18x | 24.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.63x | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HCAI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HCAI delivers a 5.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-70 for GFAI. BBAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HCAI's 0.42x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HCAI scores 7/9 vs BBAI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.5% | — | -47.8% | -69.7% | -50.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | -65.3% | -9.5% | -50.2% | -35.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.2% | -34.4% | -42.4% | -41.6% | -19.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.0% | -3.4% | -17.7% | -19.1% | -19.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.42x | — | 0.15x | 0.08x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12M | $45M | -$5M | -$19M | -$63M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $28,654 | $846,593 | $5M | $22M | $87M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $46M | $721,000 | $3M | $24M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.00x | -14.13x | -2.79x | -167.24x | -18.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BBAI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BBAI five years ago would be worth $4,305 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $50 for GFAI. Over the past 12 months, BBAI leads with a +28.6% total return vs HCAI's -94.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BBAI at 14.4% vs AIXI's -77.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +33.8% | +41.9% | -21.0% | -20.6% | -28.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -94.7% | -83.7% | -34.1% | -51.1% | +28.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.6% | -98.8% | +17.1% | -93.3% | +49.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.6% | -98.8% | -57.7% | -99.5% | -57.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.6% | -98.8% | +96.5% | -99.5% | -57.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -52.9% | -77.2% | +5.4% | -59.4% | +14.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HCAI and AEYE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HCAI is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBAI's 3.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AEYE currently trades 48.0% from its 52-week high vs HCAI's 3.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.34x | 0.71x | 2.18x | 2.36x | 3.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $318.60 | $4.02 | $16.39 | $1.50 | $9.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.32 | $0.08 | $5.31 | $0.38 | $3.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.8% | +15.2% | +48.0% | +33.9% | +44.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.5 | 48.5 | 66.5 | 43.8 | 57.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 60.7M | 195K | 315K | 34.5M |
Analyst Outlook
BBAI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | — | $6.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BBAI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). AEYE leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
HCAI vs AIXI vs AEYE vs GFAI vs BBAI: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HCAI or AIXI or AEYE or GFAI or BBAI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hauchen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (HCAI) is the stronger pick with 19. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 3% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). Hauchen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. (HCAI) offers the better valuation at 8. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) a "Hold" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HCAI or AIXI or AEYE or GFAI or BBAI?
Over the past 5 years, BigBear.
ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) delivered a total return of -57. 0%, compared to -99. 5% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEYE returned +96. 5% versus GFAI's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HCAI or AIXI or AEYE or GFAI or BBAI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hauchen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (HCAI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 31β — meaning BBAI is approximately 877% more volatile than HCAI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 42% for Hauchen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — HCAI or AIXI or AEYE or GFAI or BBAI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hauchen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (HCAI) is pulling ahead at 19. 4% versus -19. 3% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guardforce AI Co. , Limited grew EPS 88. 3% year-over-year, compared to -4. 2% for Hauchen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co. , Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HCAI leads at 69. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — HCAI or AIXI or AEYE or GFAI or BBAI?
Hauchen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (HCAI) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 7% net margin versus -230. 2% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HCAI leads at 5. 5% versus -65. 3% for BBAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEYE leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — HCAI or AIXI or AEYE or GFAI or BBAI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is HCAI or AIXI or AEYE or GFAI or BBAI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hauchen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (HCAI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34)). Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HCAI: -89. 6%, GFAI: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between HCAI and AIXI and AEYE and GFAI and BBAI?
These companies operate in different sectors (HCAI (Industrials) and AIXI (Technology) and AEYE (Technology) and GFAI (Industrials) and BBAI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HCAI is a small-cap high-growth stock; AIXI is a small-cap high-growth stock; AEYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GFAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BBAI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.