Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
HEPS logo
HEPS
MELI logo
MELI
AMZN logo
AMZN
BABA logo
BABA
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HEPS vs MELI vs AMZN vs BABA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HEPS
D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.S.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • TR
Market Cap$888M
5Y Perf.-78.7%
MELI
MercadoLibre, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • UY
Market Cap$80.59B
5Y Perf.+1.3%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.57T
5Y Perf.+43.4%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • CN
Market Cap$263.29B
5Y Perf.-42.2%

HEPS vs MELI vs AMZN vs BABA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HEPS logoHEPS
MELI logoMELI
AMZN logoAMZN
BABA logoBABA
IndustrySpecialty RetailSpecialty RetailSpecialty RetailSpecialty Retail
Market Cap$888M$80.59B$2.57T$263.29B
Revenue (TTM)$79.46B$31.80B$742.78B$1.02T
Net Income (TTM)$-5.53B$1.92B$90.80B$103.59B
Gross Margin31.9%43.9%50.6%39.8%
Operating Margin-2.4%9.6%11.5%5.8%
Forward P/E40.2x27.1x2.6x
Total Debt$3.20B$11.39B$152.99B$259.02B
Cash & Equiv.$11.51B$3.67B$86.81B$172.92B

HEPS vs MELI vs AMZN vs BABALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HEPS
MELI
AMZN
BABA
StockJul 21Jun 26Return
D-Market Elektronik… (HEPS)10021.3-78.7%
MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI)100101.3+1.3%
Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)100143.4+43.4%
Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA)10057.8-42.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HEPS vs MELI vs AMZN vs BABA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AMZN leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.S. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. BABA also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇AMZN emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
HEPS
D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.S.
The Growth Leader

HEPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and stability is your priority.

  • 61.0% revenue growth vs BABA's 2.7%
  • Beta 0.90 vs AMZN's 1.43
Best for: growth and stability
MELI
MercadoLibre, Inc.
The Growth Play

MELI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 39.1%, EPS growth 4.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.9%
  • 10.9% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 5.7%
  • Beta 1.22, current ratio 1.17x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.

  • 12.2% margin vs HEPS's -7.0%
  • +11.9% vs MELI's -32.9%
  • 11.5% ROA vs HEPS's -17.7%
Best for: quality and momentum
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
The Income Pick

BABA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.29, yield 1.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.29, Low D/E 23.1%, current ratio 1.28x
  • Lower P/E (2.6x vs 27.1x)
  • 1.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHEPS logoHEPS61.0% revenue growth vs BABA's 2.7%
ValueBABA logoBABALower P/E (2.6x vs 27.1x)
Quality / MarginsAMZN logoAMZN12.2% margin vs HEPS's -7.0%
Stability / SafetyHEPS logoHEPSBeta 0.90 vs AMZN's 1.43
DividendsBABA logoBABA1.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)AMZN logoAMZN+11.9% vs MELI's -32.9%
Efficiency (ROA)AMZN logoAMZN11.5% ROA vs HEPS's -17.7%

HEPS vs MELI vs AMZN vs BABA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the AI Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the AI Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
HEPSD-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.S.
FY 2025
Sales of goods
64.6%$57.1B
Delivery service revenues
14.0%$12.4B
Marketplace revenues
11.2%$9.9B
Other
6.0%$5.3B
Advertising
2.4%$2.1B
Subscription service
1.9%$1.7B
MELIMercadoLibre, Inc.
FY 2025
Service
87.5%$25.3B
Product
12.5%$3.6B
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
FY 2025
Online Stores
37.6%$269.3B
Third-Party Seller Services
24.0%$172.2B
Amazon Web Services
18.0%$128.7B
Advertising Services
9.6%$68.6B
Subscription Services
6.9%$49.6B
Physical Stores
3.1%$22.6B
Other Services
0.8%$5.9B
BABAAlibaba Group Holding Limited
FY 2026
Customer Management Services
44.9%$459.9B
Sales Of Goods
22.2%$227.7B
Logistics Services
13.7%$139.9B
Cloud Services
10.9%$112.1B
Membership Fees and Value Added Services
4.7%$47.6B
Product and Service, Other
3.6%$36.4B

HEPS vs MELI vs AMZN vs BABA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBABALAGGINGMELI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AMZN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

BABA is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.02T annually — 32.2x MELI's $31.8B. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HEPS's -7.0%. On growth, MELI holds the edge at +49.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricHEPS logoHEPSD-Market Elektron…MELI logoMELIMercadoLibre, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.BABA logoBABAAlibaba Group Hol…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$79.5B$31.8B$742.8B$1.02T
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.2B$3.9B$155.9B$64.7B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$5.5B$1.9B$90.8B$103.6B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$4.1B$10.7B-$2.5B-$50.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+31.9%+43.9%+50.6%+39.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-2.4%+9.6%+11.5%+5.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-7.0%+6.0%+12.2%+10.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+5.1%+33.7%-0.3%-4.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+39.0%+49.0%+16.6%+2.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-3.8%-15.5%+74.8%+100.0%
AMZN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BABA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 17.3x trailing earnings, BABA trades at a 57% valuation discount to MELI's 40.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BABA's 17.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HEPS's 26.5x.

MetricHEPS logoHEPSD-Market Elektron…MELI logoMELIMercadoLibre, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.BABA logoBABAAlibaba Group Hol…
Market CapShares × price$888M$80.6B$2.57T$263.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$709M$88.3B$2.63T$276.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-6.70x40.36x33.27x17.34x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.40.22x27.13x2.57x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.19x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple26.47x23.41x18.06x17.48x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.45x2.79x3.58x1.74x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share20.40x11.94x6.28x1.63x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF18.79x7.48x333.39x
BABA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — MELI and AMZN each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

MELI delivers a 29.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $-2 for HEPS. BABA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MELI's 1.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMZN scores 6/9 vs BABA's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricHEPS logoHEPSD-Market Elektron…MELI logoMELIMercadoLibre, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.BABA logoBABAAlibaba Group Hol…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.4%+29.6%+23.3%+9.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-17.7%+4.8%+11.5%+5.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+20.8%+14.7%+3.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-54.3%+28.3%+15.3%+4.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94564
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.59x1.69x0.37x0.23x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$8.3B$7.7B$66.2B$86.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$11.5B$3.7B$86.8B$172.9B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3.2B$11.4B$153.0B$259.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.33x14.14x39.96x14.21x
Evenly matched — MELI and AMZN each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HEPS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $14,100 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,085 for HEPS. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +11.9% total return vs MELI's -32.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HEPS at 32.6% vs MELI's 8.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHEPS logoHEPSD-Market Elektron…MELI logoMELIMercadoLibre, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.BABA logoBABAAlibaba Group Hol…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+9.4%-19.5%+5.3%-26.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-1.1%-32.9%+11.9%-0.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+133.3%+28.4%+88.5%+38.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-79.2%+11.0%+41.0%-44.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-79.2%+1092.7%+567.1%+57.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+32.6%+8.7%+23.5%+11.3%
HEPS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — HEPS and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HEPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 85.6% from its 52-week high vs BABA's 58.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricHEPS logoHEPSD-Market Elektron…MELI logoMELIMercadoLibre, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.BABA logoBABAAlibaba Group Hol…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.90x1.22x1.43x1.29x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.33$2645.22$278.56$192.67
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.15$1495.00$197.28$103.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+84.1%+60.1%+85.6%+58.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10058.843.336.829.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded301K538K42.9M10.2M
Evenly matched — HEPS and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

BABA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: HEPS as "Hold", MELI as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", BABA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 67.7% upside for BABA (target: $189) vs 29.0% for AMZN (target: $308). BABA is the only dividend payer here at 1.84% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricHEPS logoHEPSD-Market Elektron…MELI logoMELIMercadoLibre, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.BABA logoBABAAlibaba Group Hol…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$2166.67$307.77$189.17
# AnalystsCovering analysts2339459
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$14.03
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.0%0.0%+0.4%
BABA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

BABA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). AMZN leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallAlibaba Group Holding Limit… (BABA)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HEPS vs MELI vs AMZN vs BABA: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HEPS or MELI or AMZN or BABA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.

S. (HEPS) is the stronger pick with 61. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 7% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) offers the better valuation at 17. 3x trailing P/E (2. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — HEPS or MELI or AMZN or BABA?

On trailing P/E, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the cheapest at 17.

3x versus MercadoLibre, Inc. at 40. 4x. On forward P/E, Alibaba Group Holding Limited is actually cheaper at 2. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — HEPS or MELI or AMZN or BABA?

Over the past 5 years, Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +41. 0%, compared to -79. 2% for D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A. S. (HEPS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MELI returned +1093% versus HEPS's -79. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — HEPS or MELI or AMZN or BABA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.

S. (HEPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 90β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 43β — meaning AMZN is approximately 58% more volatile than HEPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 169% for MercadoLibre, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — HEPS or MELI or AMZN or BABA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.

S. (HEPS) is pulling ahead at 61. 0% versus 2. 7% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amazon. com, Inc. grew EPS 29. 7% year-over-year, compared to -286. 4% for D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A. S.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MELI leads at 38. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — HEPS or MELI or AMZN or BABA?

Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -6. 7% for D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A. S. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMZN leads at 11. 2% versus -2. 4% for HEPS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is HEPS or MELI or AMZN or BABA more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) trades at 2.

6x forward P/E versus 40. 2x for MercadoLibre, Inc. — 37. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BABA: 67. 7% to $189. 17.

08

Which pays a better dividend — HEPS or MELI or AMZN or BABA?

In this comparison, BABA (1.

8% yield) pays a dividend. HEPS, MELI, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is HEPS or MELI or AMZN or BABA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, MercadoLibre, Inc.

(MELI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 22), +1093% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MELI: +1093%, AMZN: +567. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between HEPS and MELI and AMZN and BABA?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: HEPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; MELI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; BABA is a large-cap deep-value stock. BABA pays a dividend while HEPS, MELI, AMZN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.