Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HFBL vs ICE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
HFBL vs ICE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| Market Cap | $61M | $86.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $32M | $12.64B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $3.30B |
| Gross Margin | 63.9% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 14.4% | 38.7% |
| Forward P/E | 15.8x | 19.1x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $20.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $837M |
HFBL vs ICE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home Federal Bancor… (HFBL) | 100 | 166.3 | +66.3% |
| Intercontinental Ex… (ICE) | 100 | 157.7 | +57.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HFBL vs ICE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HFBL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.19, yield 2.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.19, Low D/E 7.2%, current ratio 0.10x
- Beta 0.19, yield 2.6%, current ratio 0.10x
ICE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 7.5%, EPS growth 20.7%
- 222.9% 10Y total return vs HFBL's 112.8%
- PEG 2.15 vs HFBL's 4.77
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.5% NII/revenue growth vs HFBL's -2.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.8x vs 19.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs HFBL's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs ICE's 0.33, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs ICE's 1.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +55.9% vs ICE's -11.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs HFBL's 0.5% |
HFBL vs ICE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HFBL vs ICE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.6B annually — 390.9x HFBL's $32M. ICE is the more profitable business, keeping 26.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HFBL's 12.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $32M | $12.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8M | $6.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | $3.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8M | $4.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.9% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +38.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.0% | +26.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | +33.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +63.6% | +23.1% |
Valuation Metrics
HFBL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.8x trailing earnings, HFBL trades at a 40% valuation discount to ICE's 26.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ICE offers better value at 2.99x vs HFBL's 4.77x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $61M | $86.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $49M | $106.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.84x | 26.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.77x | 2.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.17x | 16.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.90x | 6.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.12x | 3.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.31x | 20.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ICE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ICE delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $9 for HFBL. HFBL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ICE's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs HFBL's 8/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.3% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.9% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.0% | +9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$12M | $19.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $837M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $20.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.61x | 6.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ICE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ICE five years ago would be worth $14,243 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,576 for HFBL. Over the past 12 months, HFBL leads with a +55.9% total return vs ICE's -11.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ICE at 14.0% vs HFBL's 10.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.7% | -3.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +55.9% | -11.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.4% | +48.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.8% | +42.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +112.8% | +222.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.1% | +14.0% |
Risk & Volatility
HFBL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HFBL is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICE's 0.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HFBL currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs ICE's 81.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.19x | 0.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.00 | $189.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.32 | $143.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.8% | +81.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.2 | 42.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2K | 3.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HFBL and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, HFBL offers the higher dividend yield at 2.64% vs ICE's 1.26%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $195.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.53 | $1.93 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +1.6% |
ICE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HFBL leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
HFBL vs ICE: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HFBL or ICE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the stronger pick with 7. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 9% for Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana (HFBL). Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana (HFBL) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HFBL or ICE?
On trailing P/E, Home Federal Bancorp, Inc.
of Louisiana (HFBL) is the cheapest at 15. 8x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. at 26. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HFBL or ICE?
Over the past 5 years, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) delivered a total return of +42. 4%, compared to +35. 8% for Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana (HFBL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ICE returned +222. 9% versus HFBL's +112. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HFBL or ICE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Federal Bancorp, Inc.
of Louisiana (HFBL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 19β versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 0. 33β — meaning ICE is approximately 71% more volatile than HFBL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana (HFBL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 70% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HFBL or ICE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is pulling ahead at 7. 5% versus -2. 9% for Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana (HFBL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. grew EPS 20. 7% year-over-year, compared to 7. 7% for Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HFBL or ICE?
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 1% net margin versus 12. 0% for Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana — meaning it keeps 26. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 14. 4% for HFBL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HFBL leads at 63. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — HFBL or ICE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana (HFBL) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 1. 3% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE).
08Is HFBL or ICE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Home Federal Bancorp, Inc.
of Louisiana (HFBL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 19), 2. 6% yield, +112. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HFBL: +112. 8%, ICE: +222. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between HFBL and ICE?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HFBL is a small-cap deep-value stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.