Real Estate - Diversified
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HHH vs ALX vs VNO vs PGRE vs BXP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
REIT - Office
REIT - Office
REIT - Office
HHH vs ALX vs VNO vs PGRE vs BXP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Diversified | REIT - Retail | REIT - Office | REIT - Office | REIT - Office |
| Market Cap | $3.79B | $1.25B | $6.03B | $1.46B | $9.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.51B | $212M | $1.81B | $723M | $3.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $122M | $21M | $795M | $-97M | $277M |
| Gross Margin | 11.1% | 63.6% | 73.2% | 57.2% | 60.6% |
| Operating Margin | 17.0% | 28.3% | 13.3% | 14.7% | 42.3% |
| Forward P/E | 18.2x | 20.2x | 376.9x | — | 35.7x |
| Total Debt | $5.11B | $943M | $7.89B | $3.68B | $17.36B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.47B | $128M | $841M | $375M | $1.48B |
HHH vs ALX vs VNO vs PGRE vs BXP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Howard Hughes Holdi… (HHH) | 100 | 131.6 | +31.6% |
| Alexander's, Inc. (ALX) | 100 | 94.0 | -6.0% |
| Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) | 100 | 88.5 | -11.5% |
| Paramount Group, In… (PGRE) | 100 | 85.5 | -14.5% |
| BXP, Inc. (BXP) | 100 | 69.2 | -30.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HHH vs ALX vs VNO vs PGRE vs BXP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HHH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (18.2x vs 35.7x)
ALX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 7.4%
- 7.4% 10Y total return vs BXP's -27.8%
- Beta 0.35, yield 7.4%, current ratio 8.33x
- 7.4% yield, vs VNO's 2.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
VNO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 44.0% margin vs PGRE's -13.5%
- 6.4% ROA vs PGRE's -1.2%, ROIC 1.4% vs 1.5%
PGRE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.31, Low D/E 91.7%, current ratio 7.76x
- Beta 0.31 vs VNO's 1.19, lower leverage
- +38.7% vs VNO's -15.7%
BXP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 2.2%, EPS growth 18.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.9%
- 2.2% FFO/revenue growth vs HHH's -15.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.2% FFO/revenue growth vs HHH's -15.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.2x vs 35.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 44.0% margin vs PGRE's -13.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.31 vs VNO's 1.19, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.4% yield, vs VNO's 2.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.7% vs VNO's -15.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs PGRE's -1.2%, ROIC 1.4% vs 1.5% |
HHH vs ALX vs VNO vs PGRE vs BXP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HHH vs ALX vs VNO vs PGRE vs BXP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VNO leads in 1 of 6 categories
PGRE leads 1 • ALX leads 1 • HHH leads 0 • BXP leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VNO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BXP is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.5B annually — 16.5x ALX's $212M. VNO is the more profitable business, keeping 44.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PGRE's -13.5%. On growth, HHH holds the edge at +18.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $212M | $1.8B | $723M | $3.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $443M | $97M | $719M | $342M | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $122M | $21M | $795M | -$97M | $277M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $453M | $65M | $1.3B | $165M | $690M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.1% | +63.6% | +73.2% | +57.2% | +60.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.0% | +28.3% | +13.3% | +14.7% | +42.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +9.7% | +44.0% | -13.5% | +8.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +30.0% | +30.5% | +69.4% | +22.9% | +19.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.4% | -2.7% | -0.5% | -11.3% | +2.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.3% | -62.1% | -127.9% | -191.5% | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
PGRE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.6x trailing earnings, VNO trades at a 83% valuation discount to ALX's 44.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BXP's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALX's 20.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.8B | $1.2B | $6.0B | $1.5B | $9.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.4B | $2.1B | $13.1B | $4.8B | $25.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.25x | 44.39x | 7.63x | -31.43x | 34.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.20x | 20.21x | 376.94x | — | 35.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.02x | 20.57x | 17.34x | 12.29x | 8.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.57x | 5.85x | 3.33x | 1.93x | 2.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.98x | 11.49x | 0.90x | 0.36x | 1.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.59x | 16.98x | 4.79x | 5.53x | 13.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ALX and VNO each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALX delivers a 17.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-2 for PGRE. PGRE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.92x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALX's 8.64x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VNO scores 7/9 vs ALX's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.2% | +17.4% | +11.8% | -2.4% | +3.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +2.2% | +6.4% | -1.2% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | +5.2% | +1.4% | +1.5% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.7% | +5.5% | +1.8% | +1.9% | +7.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.33x | 8.64x | 1.16x | 0.92x | 2.26x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.6B | $815M | $7.0B | $3.3B | $15.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.5B | $128M | $841M | $375M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.1B | $943M | $7.9B | $3.7B | $17.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.93x | 1.55x | 3.63x | 0.95x | 1.59x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALX five years ago would be worth $12,151 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,353 for HHH. Over the past 12 months, PGRE leads with a +38.7% total return vs VNO's -15.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VNO at 34.9% vs HHH's -2.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.4% | +13.6% | -4.2% | — | -11.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.5% | +23.2% | -15.7% | +38.7% | -2.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.3% | +69.5% | +145.3% | +51.6% | +38.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.5% | +21.5% | -17.6% | -30.5% | -27.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.8% | +7.4% | -34.5% | -46.2% | -27.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.8% | +19.2% | +34.9% | +14.9% | +11.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALX and PGRE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PGRE is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VNO's 1.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs HHH's 69.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.99x | 0.35x | 1.19x | 0.31x | 0.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $91.07 | $260.84 | $43.37 | $7.85 | $79.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $61.01 | $201.28 | $24.57 | $4.48 | $49.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.7% | +93.6% | +73.9% | +84.1% | +75.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.2 | 60.1 | 68.9 | 56.8 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 498K | 54K | 2.0M | 1.5M | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ALX and VNO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HHH as "Buy", ALX as "Buy", VNO as "Hold", PGRE as "Hold", BXP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 81.8% upside for PGRE (target: $12) vs -48.8% for ALX (target: $125). For income investors, ALX offers the higher dividend yield at 7.37% vs PGRE's 1.59%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $87.50 | $125.00 | $37.50 | $12.00 | $72.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 2 | 28 | 13 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +7.4% | +2.3% | +1.6% | +6.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $18.00 | $0.74 | $0.11 | $4.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.8% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
VNO leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). PGRE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
HHH vs ALX vs VNO vs PGRE vs BXP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HHH or ALX or VNO or PGRE or BXP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BXP, Inc.
(BXP) is the stronger pick with 2. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 8% for Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. (HHH). Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) offers the better valuation at 7. 6x trailing P/E (376. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. (HHH) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HHH or ALX or VNO or PGRE or BXP?
On trailing P/E, Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) is the cheapest at 7.
6x versus Alexander's, Inc. at 44. 4x. On forward P/E, Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HHH or ALX or VNO or PGRE or BXP?
Over the past 5 years, Alexander's, Inc.
(ALX) delivered a total return of +21. 5%, compared to -36. 5% for Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. (HHH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALX returned +7. 4% versus PGRE's -46. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HHH or ALX or VNO or PGRE or BXP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Paramount Group, Inc.
(PGRE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 31β versus Vornado Realty Trust's 1. 19β — meaning VNO is approximately 281% more volatile than PGRE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Paramount Group, Inc. (PGRE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 92% versus 9% for Alexander's, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HHH or ALX or VNO or PGRE or BXP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BXP, Inc.
(BXP) is pulling ahead at 2. 2% versus -15. 8% for Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. (HHH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vornado Realty Trust grew EPS 104. 0% year-over-year, compared to -47. 0% for Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BXP leads at 3. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HHH or ALX or VNO or PGRE or BXP?
Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) is the more profitable company, earning 50.
0% net margin versus -6. 1% for Paramount Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BXP leads at 55. 7% versus 15. 0% for VNO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VNO leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HHH or ALX or VNO or PGRE or BXP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.
(HHH) trades at 18. 2x forward P/E versus 376. 9x for Vornado Realty Trust — 358. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PGRE: 81. 8% to $12. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HHH or ALX or VNO or PGRE or BXP?
In this comparison, ALX (7.
4% yield), BXP (6. 8% yield), VNO (2. 3% yield), PGRE (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. HHH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HHH or ALX or VNO or PGRE or BXP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alexander's, Inc.
(ALX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), 7. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALX: +7. 4%, HHH: -32. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HHH and ALX and VNO and PGRE and BXP?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HHH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; VNO is a small-cap deep-value stock; PGRE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BXP is a small-cap income-oriented stock. ALX, VNO, PGRE, BXP pay a dividend while HHH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.