Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HIFS vs CAT vs DE vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
Agricultural - Machinery
Banks - Regional
HIFS vs CAT vs DE vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $626M | $416.75B | $157.32B | $2.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $217M | $70.75B | $45.88B | $867M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $45M | $9.42B | $4.08B | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 30.1% | 32.5% | 34.7% | 72.1% |
| Operating Margin | 16.8% | 16.6% | 17.0% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 20.4x | 38.8x | 32.5x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.50B | $43.33B | $63.94B | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $352M | $9.98B | $8.28B | $185M |
HIFS vs CAT vs DE vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hingham Institution… (HIFS) | 100 | 174.8 | +74.8% |
| Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) | 100 | 745.6 | +645.6% |
| Deere & Company (DE) | 100 | 381.5 | +281.5% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HIFS vs CAT vs DE vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HIFS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 14.1%, EPS growth 6.8%
- 14.1% NII/revenue growth vs DE's -2.2%
CAT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 12.3% 10Y total return vs DE's 6.7%
- PEG 1.38 vs DE's 1.99
- +181.5% vs NBTB's +9.0%
- 10.0% ROA vs HIFS's 1.0%, ROIC 15.9% vs 1.4%
DE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, current ratio 2.31x
- Beta 0.56, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.31x
- Beta 0.56 vs CAT's 1.54
NBTB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- NIM 3.1% vs HIFS's 1.0%
- Lower P/E (10.8x vs 32.5x), PEG 1.53 vs 1.99
- 19.5% margin vs DE's 8.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.1% NII/revenue growth vs DE's -2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.8x vs 32.5x), PEG 1.53 vs 1.99 | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.5% margin vs DE's 8.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs CAT's 1.54 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs DE's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +181.5% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.0% ROA vs HIFS's 1.0%, ROIC 15.9% vs 1.4% |
HIFS vs CAT vs DE vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HIFS vs CAT vs DE vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 3 of 6 categories
CAT leads 2 • HIFS leads 0 • DE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $70.8B annually — 325.5x HIFS's $217M. NBTB is the more profitable business, keeping 19.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DE's 8.9%. On growth, CAT holds the edge at +22.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $217M | $70.8B | $45.9B | $867M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $62M | $14.0B | $9.5B | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $45M | $9.4B | $4.1B | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $30M | $11.4B | $5.5B | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.1% | +32.5% | +34.7% | +72.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | +16.6% | +17.0% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.0% | +13.3% | +8.9% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +16.2% | +12.0% | +25.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +22.2% | +16.3% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +195.1% | +30.2% | -24.1% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
NBTB leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 72% valuation discount to CAT's 47.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CAT offers better value at 1.69x vs NBTB's 1.92x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $626M | $416.8B | $157.3B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $450.1B | $213.0B | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.33x | 47.57x | 31.37x | 13.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.43x | 38.79x | 32.53x | 10.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.69x | 1.92x | 1.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 47.53x | 33.41x | 20.01x | 10.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.88x | 6.17x | 3.52x | 2.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.46x | 19.71x | 6.06x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 53.27x | 40.56x | 48.69x | 10.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CAT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CAT delivers a 47.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $10 for NBTB. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIFS's 3.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs DE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.8% | +47.5% | +15.5% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +10.0% | +3.9% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.4% | +15.9% | +7.7% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +19.1% | +11.4% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.47x | 2.03x | 2.46x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $33.4B | $55.7B | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $352M | $10.0B | $8.3B | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $43.3B | $63.9B | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.44x | 9.22x | 2.74x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CAT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CAT five years ago would be worth $38,251 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,808 for HIFS. Over the past 12 months, CAT leads with a +181.5% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAT at 62.0% vs NBTB's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.3% | +50.2% | +24.7% | +9.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.4% | +181.5% | +24.2% | +9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.9% | +324.9% | +57.4% | +54.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.9% | +282.5% | +54.1% | +29.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +142.5% | +1227.6% | +671.0% | +102.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.4% | +62.0% | +16.3% | +15.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CAT and DE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DE is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAT's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAT currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs HIFS's 84.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.25x | 1.54x | 0.56x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $338.00 | $931.35 | $674.19 | $46.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $220.76 | $318.11 | $433.00 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.9% | +96.2% | +86.1% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.0 | 76.2 | 54.0 | 57.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 51K | 2.4M | 1.2M | 236K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CAT as "Buy", DE as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 17.3% upside for DE (target: $681) vs -7.9% for CAT (target: $825). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs CAT's 0.65%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $824.80 | $680.54 | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 53 | 46 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +0.7% | +1.1% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 8 | 8 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.50 | $5.86 | $6.33 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% | +0.7% | +0.4% |
NBTB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CAT leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
HIFS vs CAT vs DE vs NBTB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HIFS or CAT or DE or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) is the stronger pick with 14.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Deere & Company (DE). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) a "Buy" — based on 53 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HIFS or CAT or DE or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus Caterpillar Inc. at 47. 6x. On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Caterpillar Inc. wins at 1. 38x versus Deere & Company's 1. 99x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HIFS or CAT or DE or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) delivered a total return of +282. 5%, compared to -1. 9% for Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAT returned +1228% versus NBTB's +102. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HIFS or CAT or DE or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Deere & Company (DE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
56β versus Caterpillar Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning CAT is approximately 173% more volatile than DE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for Hingham Institution for Savings — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HIFS or CAT or DE or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) is pulling ahead at 14.
1% versus -2. 2% for Deere & Company (DE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NBT Bancorp Inc. grew EPS 12. 5% year-over-year, compared to -14. 6% for Caterpillar Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CAT leads at 4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HIFS or CAT or DE or NBTB?
NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus 11. 3% for Deere & Company — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTB leads at 25. 3% versus 16. 6% for CAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HIFS or CAT or DE or NBTB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 38x versus Deere & Company's 1. 99x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 38. 8x for Caterpillar Inc. — 28. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DE: 17. 3% to $680. 54.
08Which pays a better dividend — HIFS or CAT or DE or NBTB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 0. 7% for Caterpillar Inc. (CAT).
09Is HIFS or CAT or DE or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Deere & Company (DE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
56), 1. 1% yield, +671. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DE: +671. 0%, HIFS: +142. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HIFS and CAT and DE and NBTB?
These companies operate in different sectors (HIFS (Financial Services) and CAT (Industrials) and DE (Industrials) and NBTB (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HIFS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CAT is a large-cap quality compounder stock; DE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.