Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HIFS vs NBTB vs INDB vs EFSC vs NWBI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
HIFS vs NBTB vs INDB vs EFSC vs NWBI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $626M | $2.35B | $3.89B | $2.18B | $2.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $217M | $867M | $974M | $912M | $877M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $45M | $169M | $180M | $201M | $126M |
| Gross Margin | 30.1% | 72.1% | 66.4% | 68.4% | 68.3% |
| Operating Margin | 16.8% | 25.3% | 25.4% | 31.1% | 18.8% |
| Forward P/E | 20.4x | 10.8x | 10.7x | 10.7x | 10.2x |
| Total Debt | $1.50B | $327M | $701M | $509M | $446M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $352M | $185M | $220M | $208M | $234M |
HIFS vs NBTB vs INDB vs EFSC vs NWBI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hingham Institution… (HIFS) | 100 | 174.8 | +74.8% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Independent Bank Co… (INDB) | 100 | 112.6 | +12.6% |
| Enterprise Financia… (EFSC) | 100 | 202.8 | +102.8% |
| Northwest Bancshare… (NWBI) | 100 | 138.9 | +38.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HIFS vs NBTB vs INDB vs EFSC vs NWBI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HIFS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs NWBI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs NWBI's 0.5%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
INDB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +32.7% vs NBTB's +9.0%
EFSC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 153.5% 10Y total return vs NBTB's 102.2%
- PEG 0.77 vs NBTB's 1.53
- NIM 3.6% vs HIFS's 1.0%
- 2.0% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs NWBI's 5.4%
NWBI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 16.3%, EPS growth 16.5%
- Beta 0.73, yield 5.4%, current ratio 0.13x
- 16.3% NII/revenue growth vs INDB's 6.9%
- Lower P/E (10.2x vs 10.7x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.3% NII/revenue growth vs INDB's 6.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.2x vs 10.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs NWBI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs HIFS's 1.25, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs NWBI's 5.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.7% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs NWBI's 0.5% |
HIFS vs NBTB vs INDB vs EFSC vs NWBI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
HIFS vs NBTB vs INDB vs EFSC vs NWBI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
INDB leads in 1 of 6 categories
NWBI leads 1 • HIFS leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • EFSC leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NBTB and EFSC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INDB is the larger business by revenue, generating $974M annually — 4.5x HIFS's $217M. EFSC is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HIFS's 13.0%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $217M | $867M | $974M | $912M | $877M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $62M | $241M | $272M | $291M | $166M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $45M | $169M | $180M | $201M | $126M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $30M | $225M | $209M | $182M | $142M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.1% | +72.1% | +66.4% | +68.4% | +68.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | +25.3% | +25.4% | +31.1% | +18.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.0% | +19.5% | +19.7% | +22.1% | +14.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +25.2% | +21.5% | +19.9% | +16.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +195.1% | +39.5% | -31.7% | +13.3% | +19.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — EFSC and NWBI each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.2x trailing earnings, EFSC trades at a 50% valuation discount to HIFS's 22.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EFSC offers better value at 0.80x vs NBTB's 1.92x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $626M | $2.4B | $3.9B | $2.2B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $2.5B | $4.4B | $2.5B | $2.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.33x | 13.53x | 17.31x | 11.22x | 15.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.43x | 10.80x | 10.74x | 10.74x | 10.20x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.92x | — | 0.80x | 1.83x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 47.53x | 10.35x | 15.19x | 8.51x | 13.57x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.88x | 2.71x | 4.00x | 2.39x | 2.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.46x | 1.21x | 1.11x | 1.09x | 1.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 53.27x | 10.75x | 18.59x | 12.00x | 14.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — NBTB and EFSC each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EFSC delivers a 10.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $5 for INDB. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIFS's 3.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs HIFS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.8% | +9.5% | +5.1% | +10.3% | +7.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +1.1% | +0.7% | +1.2% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.4% | +7.9% | +4.7% | +8.8% | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +2.4% | +5.8% | +2.9% | +6.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.47x | 0.17x | 0.23x | 0.25x | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $142M | $481M | $300M | $213M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $352M | $185M | $220M | $208M | $234M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $327M | $701M | $509M | $446M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.44x | 1.05x | 0.77x | 1.08x | 0.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INDB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NBTB five years ago would be worth $12,989 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,808 for HIFS. Over the past 12 months, INDB leads with a +32.7% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INDB at 21.1% vs NBTB's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.3% | +9.3% | +7.8% | +10.8% | +18.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.4% | +9.0% | +32.7% | +15.3% | +18.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.9% | +54.1% | +77.6% | +63.7% | +56.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.9% | +29.9% | +11.6% | +28.1% | +26.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +142.5% | +102.2% | +109.5% | +153.5% | +52.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.4% | +15.5% | +21.1% | +17.9% | +16.0% |
Risk & Volatility
NWBI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NWBI is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIFS's 1.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NWBI currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs HIFS's 84.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.25x | 0.89x | 1.11x | 0.90x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $338.00 | $46.92 | $87.00 | $62.30 | $14.26 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $220.76 | $39.20 | $57.01 | $50.88 | $11.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.9% | +96.1% | +89.9% | +95.6% | +97.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.0 | 57.3 | 53.5 | 59.5 | 64.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 51K | 236K | 324K | 269K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EFSC and NWBI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NBTB as "Hold", INDB as "Hold", EFSC as "Buy", NWBI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 14.2% upside for EFSC (target: $68) vs 2.1% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, NWBI offers the higher dividend yield at 5.42% vs HIFS's 0.87%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.00 | $88.33 | $68.00 | $14.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 15 | 9 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +3.2% | +2.9% | +2.0% | +5.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 12 | 3 | 14 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.50 | $1.43 | $2.26 | $1.21 | $0.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | +0.8% | +0.6% | 0.0% |
INDB leads in 1 of 6 categories (Total Returns). NWBI leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 4 tied.
HIFS vs NBTB vs INDB vs EFSC vs NWBI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HIFS or NBTB or INDB or EFSC or NWBI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) is the stronger pick with 16. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 9% for Independent Bank Corp. (INDB). Enterprise Financial Services Corp (EFSC) offers the better valuation at 11. 2x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Enterprise Financial Services Corp (EFSC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HIFS or NBTB or INDB or EFSC or NWBI?
On trailing P/E, Enterprise Financial Services Corp (EFSC) is the cheapest at 11.
2x versus Hingham Institution for Savings at 22. 3x. On forward P/E, Northwest Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Enterprise Financial Services Corp wins at 0. 77x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HIFS or NBTB or INDB or EFSC or NWBI?
Over the past 5 years, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) delivered a total return of +29. 9%, compared to -1. 9% for Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EFSC returned +153. 5% versus NWBI's +52. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HIFS or NBTB or INDB or EFSC or NWBI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Hingham Institution for Savings's 1. 25β — meaning HIFS is approximately 71% more volatile than NWBI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for Hingham Institution for Savings — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HIFS or NBTB or INDB or EFSC or NWBI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) is pulling ahead at 16. 3% versus 6. 9% for Independent Bank Corp. (INDB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Northwest Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 16. 5% year-over-year, compared to -16. 6% for Independent Bank Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HIFS or NBTB or INDB or EFSC or NWBI?
Enterprise Financial Services Corp (EFSC) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
1% net margin versus 13. 0% for Hingham Institution for Savings — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EFSC leads at 31. 1% versus 16. 8% for HIFS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HIFS or NBTB or INDB or EFSC or NWBI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Enterprise Financial Services Corp (EFSC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 77x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) trades at 10. 2x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for Hingham Institution for Savings — 10. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EFSC: 14. 2% to $68. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HIFS or NBTB or INDB or EFSC or NWBI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) offers the highest yield at 5. 4%, versus 0. 9% for Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS).
09Is HIFS or NBTB or INDB or EFSC or NWBI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 5. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NWBI: +52. 3%, HIFS: +142. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HIFS and NBTB and INDB and EFSC and NWBI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HIFS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; INDB is a small-cap deep-value stock; EFSC is a small-cap deep-value stock; NWBI is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.