Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HIHO vs TWIN vs ASTE vs FLXS vs CMI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HIHO
Highway Holdings Limited

Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication

IndustrialsNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$3M
5Y Perf.-58.6%
TWIN
Twin Disc, Incorporated

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$266M
5Y Perf.+235.3%
ASTE
Astec Industries, Inc.

Agricultural - Machinery

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.21B
5Y Perf.+24.8%
FLXS
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$295M
5Y Perf.+455.5%
CMI
Cummins Inc.

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$94.29B
5Y Perf.+302.4%

HIHO vs TWIN vs ASTE vs FLXS vs CMI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HIHO logoHIHO
TWIN logoTWIN
ASTE logoASTE
FLXS logoFLXS
CMI logoCMI
IndustryManufacturing - Metal FabricationIndustrial - MachineryAgricultural - MachineryFurnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesIndustrial - Machinery
Market Cap$3M$266M$1.21B$295M$94.29B
Revenue (TTM)$6M$348M$1.48B$458M$33.89B
Net Income (TTM)$-535K$22M$26M$22M$2.67B
Gross Margin29.4%27.9%26.1%23.2%25.4%
Operating Margin-21.6%3.3%3.7%6.1%11.2%
Forward P/E33.0x25.2x14.2x11.9x25.9x
Total Debt$810K$49M$320M$59M$8.11B
Cash & Equiv.$6M$16M$72M$40M$2.85B

HIHO vs TWIN vs ASTE vs FLXS vs CMILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HIHO
TWIN
ASTE
FLXS
CMI
StockMay 20May 26Return
Highway Holdings Li… (HIHO)10041.4-58.6%
Twin Disc, Incorpor… (TWIN)100335.3+235.3%
Astec Industries, I… (ASTE)100124.8+24.8%
Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS)100555.5+455.5%
Cummins Inc. (CMI)100402.4+302.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HIHO vs TWIN vs ASTE vs FLXS vs CMI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HIHO leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Cummins Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. TWIN and FLXS also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
HIHO
Highway Holdings Limited
The Income Pick

HIHO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 14.1%
  • Rev growth 17.3%, EPS growth 111.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -15.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.70, Low D/E 12.9%, current ratio 2.79x
  • Beta 0.70, yield 14.1%, current ratio 2.79x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
TWIN
Twin Disc, Incorporated
The Momentum Pick

TWIN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +156.5% vs HIHO's -51.2%
Best for: momentum
ASTE
Astec Industries, Inc.
The Value Angle

Among these 5 stocks, ASTE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
FLXS
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
The Value Play

FLXS is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (11.9x vs 25.9x)
Best for: value
CMI
Cummins Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CMI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 5.6% 10Y total return vs TWIN's 87.2%
  • 7.9% margin vs HIHO's -8.7%
  • 7.8% ROA vs HIHO's -6.4%, ROIC 16.1% vs -31.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHIHO logoHIHO17.3% revenue growth vs CMI's -1.3%
ValueFLXS logoFLXSLower P/E (11.9x vs 25.9x)
Quality / MarginsCMI logoCMI7.9% margin vs HIHO's -8.7%
Stability / SafetyHIHO logoHIHOBeta 0.70 vs ASTE's 1.63, lower leverage
DividendsHIHO logoHIHO14.1% yield, vs CMI's 1.1%
Momentum (1Y)TWIN logoTWIN+156.5% vs HIHO's -51.2%
Efficiency (ROA)CMI logoCMI7.8% ROA vs HIHO's -6.4%, ROIC 16.1% vs -31.7%

HIHO vs TWIN vs ASTE vs FLXS vs CMI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

HIHOHighway Holdings Limited
FY 2023
Electric Member
100.0%$4M
TWINTwin Disc, Incorporated
FY 2025
Marine and Propulsion Systems
59.0%$201M
Land Based Transmissions
23.5%$80M
Industrial
12.2%$42M
Other
5.3%$18M
ASTEAstec Industries, Inc.
FY 2025
Infrastructure Group
61.6%$893M
Material Solutions
38.4%$558M
FLXSFlexsteel Industries, Inc.
FY 2023
Residential
100.0%$394M
CMICummins Inc.
FY 2025
Distribution
36.8%$12.4B
Engine
32.3%$10.9B
Components
30.1%$10.1B
Power Systems
22.2%$7.5B
Accelera
1.4%$460M
Total Segment
-22.8%$-7,682,000,000

HIHO vs TWIN vs ASTE vs FLXS vs CMI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCMILAGGINGASTE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CMI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CMI is the larger business by revenue, generating $33.9B annually — 5517.5x HIHO's $6M. CMI is the more profitable business, keeping 7.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HIHO's -8.7%. On growth, ASTE holds the edge at +20.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricHIHO logoHIHOHighway Holdings …TWIN logoTWINTwin Disc, Incorp…ASTE logoASTEAstec Industries,…FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…CMI logoCMICummins Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$6M$348M$1.5B$458M$33.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$653,000$27M$84M$31M$4.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$535,000$22M$26M$22M$2.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$0-$70,000$44M$28M$2.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+29.4%+27.9%+26.1%+23.2%+25.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-21.6%+3.3%+3.7%+6.1%+11.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-8.7%+6.3%+1.7%+4.8%+7.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-6.2%-0.0%+3.0%+6.1%+7.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-44.3%+0.3%+20.3%+9.8%+2.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.5%+22.7%-90.3%-27.2%-21.0%
CMI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

HIHO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 15.5x trailing earnings, FLXS trades at a 53% valuation discount to CMI's 33.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FLXS's 10.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CMI's 20.0x.

MetricHIHO logoHIHOHighway Holdings …TWIN logoTWINTwin Disc, Incorp…ASTE logoASTEAstec Industries,…FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…CMI logoCMICummins Inc.
Market CapShares × price$3M$266M$1.2B$295M$94.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$2M$299M$1.5B$314M$99.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS32.99x-131.50x31.55x15.54x33.29x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.22x14.17x11.90x25.92x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.95x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple-22.47x12.05x14.36x10.38x20.03x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.47x0.78x0.86x0.67x2.80x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.56x1.55x1.80x1.87x7.06x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF30.10x56.50x8.74x39.52x
HIHO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CMI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

CMI delivers a 20.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-9 for HIHO. HIHO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMI's 0.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs ASTE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricHIHO logoHIHOHighway Holdings …TWIN logoTWINTwin Disc, Incorp…ASTE logoASTEAstec Industries,…FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…CMI logoCMICummins Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-9.0%+13.2%+3.8%+12.2%+20.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-6.4%+6.1%+2.0%+7.5%+7.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-31.7%+3.9%+6.2%+9.9%+16.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-7.7%+4.5%+7.2%+12.3%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965587
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.13x0.30x0.47x0.35x0.61x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$5M$33M$248M$19M$5.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$6M$16M$72M$40M$2.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$810,000$49M$320M$59M$8.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.82x5.48x380.21x12.15x
CMI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FLXS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CMI five years ago would be worth $26,872 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,296 for HIHO. Over the past 12 months, TWIN leads with a +156.5% total return vs HIHO's -51.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLXS at 50.7% vs HIHO's -18.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHIHO logoHIHOHighway Holdings …TWIN logoTWINTwin Disc, Incorp…ASTE logoASTEAstec Industries,…FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…CMI logoCMICummins Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-42.0%+13.9%+19.0%+38.7%+31.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-51.2%+156.5%+40.5%+80.1%+131.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-45.4%+55.3%+31.7%+242.4%+214.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-57.0%+47.5%-20.4%+19.5%+168.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-41.1%+87.2%+22.1%+51.4%+557.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-18.3%+15.8%+9.6%+50.7%+46.5%
FLXS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — HIHO and CMI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HIHO is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASTE's 1.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CMI currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs HIHO's 36.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricHIHO logoHIHOHighway Holdings …TWIN logoTWINTwin Disc, Incorp…ASTE logoASTEAstec Industries,…FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…CMI logoCMICummins Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.70x1.04x1.63x1.51x1.57x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.21$19.63$65.65$59.95$718.08
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.74$6.80$36.43$29.38$296.59
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+36.0%+93.8%+80.7%+92.0%+95.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10047.458.339.160.475.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded60K49K227K47K794K
Evenly matched — HIHO and CMI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — HIHO and CMI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: TWIN as "Hold", ASTE as "Buy", CMI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -2.1% upside for FLXS (target: $54) vs -32.1% for ASTE (target: $36). For income investors, HIHO offers the higher dividend yield at 14.06% vs TWIN's 0.90%.

MetricHIHO logoHIHOHighway Holdings …TWIN logoTWINTwin Disc, Incorp…ASTE logoASTEAstec Industries,…FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…CMI logoCMICummins Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$36.00$54.00$621.10
# AnalystsCovering analysts41251
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+14.1%+0.9%+1.0%+1.1%+1.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises030121
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.11$0.16$0.51$0.63$7.61
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.5%0.0%+1.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — HIHO and CMI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CMI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HIHO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallCummins Inc. (CMI)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HIHO vs TWIN vs ASTE vs FLXS vs CMI: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HIHO or TWIN or ASTE or FLXS or CMI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) is the stronger pick with 17.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 3% for Cummins Inc. (CMI). Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — HIHO or TWIN or ASTE or FLXS or CMI?

On trailing P/E, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.

(FLXS) is the cheapest at 15. 5x versus Cummins Inc. at 33. 3x. On forward P/E, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 9x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — HIHO or TWIN or ASTE or FLXS or CMI?

Over the past 5 years, Cummins Inc.

(CMI) delivered a total return of +168. 7%, compared to -57. 0% for Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CMI returned +557. 4% versus HIHO's -41. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — HIHO or TWIN or ASTE or FLXS or CMI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

70β versus Astec Industries, Inc. 's 1. 63β — meaning ASTE is approximately 134% more volatile than HIHO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 61% for Cummins Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — HIHO or TWIN or ASTE or FLXS or CMI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) is pulling ahead at 17.

3% versus -1. 3% for Cummins Inc. (CMI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Astec Industries, Inc. grew EPS 784. 2% year-over-year, compared to -117. 7% for Twin Disc, Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, TWIN leads at 11. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — HIHO or TWIN or ASTE or FLXS or CMI?

Cummins Inc.

(CMI) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 4% net margin versus -0. 6% for Twin Disc, Incorporated — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CMI leads at 11. 5% versus -7. 2% for HIHO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HIHO leads at 33. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is HIHO or TWIN or ASTE or FLXS or CMI more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.

(FLXS) trades at 11. 9x forward P/E versus 25. 9x for Cummins Inc. — 14. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FLXS: -2. 1% to $54. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — HIHO or TWIN or ASTE or FLXS or CMI?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) offers the highest yield at 14. 1%, versus 0. 9% for Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN).

09

Is HIHO or TWIN or ASTE or FLXS or CMI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

70), 14. 1% yield). Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HIHO: -41. 1%, ASTE: +22. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between HIHO and TWIN and ASTE and FLXS and CMI?

These companies operate in different sectors (HIHO (Industrials) and TWIN (Industrials) and ASTE (Industrials) and FLXS (Consumer Cyclical) and CMI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: HIHO is a small-cap high-growth stock; TWIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; ASTE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock; CMI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

HIHO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 17%
  • Dividend Yield > 5.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TWIN

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ASTE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FLXS

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CMI

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform HIHO and TWIN and ASTE and FLXS and CMI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(HIHO: -44.3% · TWIN: 0.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.