Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HIHO vs TWIN vs ASTE vs FLXS vs CMI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Agricultural - Machinery
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Industrial - Machinery
HIHO vs TWIN vs ASTE vs FLXS vs CMI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Industrial - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $3M | $266M | $1.21B | $295M | $94.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6M | $348M | $1.48B | $458M | $33.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-535K | $22M | $26M | $22M | $2.67B |
| Gross Margin | 29.4% | 27.9% | 26.1% | 23.2% | 25.4% |
| Operating Margin | -21.6% | 3.3% | 3.7% | 6.1% | 11.2% |
| Forward P/E | 33.0x | 25.2x | 14.2x | 11.9x | 25.9x |
| Total Debt | $810K | $49M | $320M | $59M | $8.11B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $16M | $72M | $40M | $2.85B |
HIHO vs TWIN vs ASTE vs FLXS vs CMI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Highway Holdings Li… (HIHO) | 100 | 41.4 | -58.6% |
| Twin Disc, Incorpor… (TWIN) | 100 | 335.3 | +235.3% |
| Astec Industries, I… (ASTE) | 100 | 124.8 | +24.8% |
| Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS) | 100 | 555.5 | +455.5% |
| Cummins Inc. (CMI) | 100 | 402.4 | +302.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HIHO vs TWIN vs ASTE vs FLXS vs CMI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HIHO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 14.1%
- Rev growth 17.3%, EPS growth 111.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -15.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.70, Low D/E 12.9%, current ratio 2.79x
- Beta 0.70, yield 14.1%, current ratio 2.79x
TWIN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +156.5% vs HIHO's -51.2%
Among these 5 stocks, ASTE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FLXS is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (11.9x vs 25.9x)
CMI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 5.6% 10Y total return vs TWIN's 87.2%
- 7.9% margin vs HIHO's -8.7%
- 7.8% ROA vs HIHO's -6.4%, ROIC 16.1% vs -31.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.3% revenue growth vs CMI's -1.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.9x vs 25.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.9% margin vs HIHO's -8.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs ASTE's 1.63, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 14.1% yield, vs CMI's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +156.5% vs HIHO's -51.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.8% ROA vs HIHO's -6.4%, ROIC 16.1% vs -31.7% |
HIHO vs TWIN vs ASTE vs FLXS vs CMI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HIHO vs TWIN vs ASTE vs FLXS vs CMI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CMI leads in 2 of 6 categories
HIHO leads 1 • FLXS leads 1 • TWIN leads 0 • ASTE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMI is the larger business by revenue, generating $33.9B annually — 5517.5x HIHO's $6M. CMI is the more profitable business, keeping 7.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HIHO's -8.7%. On growth, ASTE holds the edge at +20.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6M | $348M | $1.5B | $458M | $33.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$653,000 | $27M | $84M | $31M | $4.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$535,000 | $22M | $26M | $22M | $2.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$70,000 | $44M | $28M | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.4% | +27.9% | +26.1% | +23.2% | +25.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -21.6% | +3.3% | +3.7% | +6.1% | +11.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.7% | +6.3% | +1.7% | +4.8% | +7.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.2% | -0.0% | +3.0% | +6.1% | +7.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.3% | +0.3% | +20.3% | +9.8% | +2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | +22.7% | -90.3% | -27.2% | -21.0% |
Valuation Metrics
HIHO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, FLXS trades at a 53% valuation discount to CMI's 33.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FLXS's 10.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CMI's 20.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $266M | $1.2B | $295M | $94.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$2M | $299M | $1.5B | $314M | $99.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 32.99x | -131.50x | 31.55x | 15.54x | 33.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 25.22x | 14.17x | 11.90x | 25.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 2.95x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -22.47x | 12.05x | 14.36x | 10.38x | 20.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.47x | 0.78x | 0.86x | 0.67x | 2.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.56x | 1.55x | 1.80x | 1.87x | 7.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 30.10x | 56.50x | 8.74x | 39.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CMI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CMI delivers a 20.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-9 for HIHO. HIHO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMI's 0.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs ASTE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.0% | +13.2% | +3.8% | +12.2% | +20.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.4% | +6.1% | +2.0% | +7.5% | +7.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -31.7% | +3.9% | +6.2% | +9.9% | +16.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.7% | +4.5% | +7.2% | +12.3% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.30x | 0.47x | 0.35x | 0.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $33M | $248M | $19M | $5.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $16M | $72M | $40M | $2.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $810,000 | $49M | $320M | $59M | $8.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.82x | 5.48x | 380.21x | 12.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLXS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CMI five years ago would be worth $26,872 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,296 for HIHO. Over the past 12 months, TWIN leads with a +156.5% total return vs HIHO's -51.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLXS at 50.7% vs HIHO's -18.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -42.0% | +13.9% | +19.0% | +38.7% | +31.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -51.2% | +156.5% | +40.5% | +80.1% | +131.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.4% | +55.3% | +31.7% | +242.4% | +214.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.0% | +47.5% | -20.4% | +19.5% | +168.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.1% | +87.2% | +22.1% | +51.4% | +557.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.3% | +15.8% | +9.6% | +50.7% | +46.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HIHO and CMI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HIHO is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASTE's 1.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CMI currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs HIHO's 36.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.70x | 1.04x | 1.63x | 1.51x | 1.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.21 | $19.63 | $65.65 | $59.95 | $718.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.74 | $6.80 | $36.43 | $29.38 | $296.59 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.0% | +93.8% | +80.7% | +92.0% | +95.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.4 | 58.3 | 39.1 | 60.4 | 75.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 60K | 49K | 227K | 47K | 794K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HIHO and CMI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TWIN as "Hold", ASTE as "Buy", CMI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -2.1% upside for FLXS (target: $54) vs -32.1% for ASTE (target: $36). For income investors, HIHO offers the higher dividend yield at 14.06% vs TWIN's 0.90%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $36.00 | $54.00 | $621.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 | 12 | — | 51 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +14.1% | +0.9% | +1.0% | +1.1% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 21 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.11 | $0.16 | $0.51 | $0.63 | $7.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% | 0.0% | +1.0% | 0.0% |
CMI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HIHO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
HIHO vs TWIN vs ASTE vs FLXS vs CMI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HIHO or TWIN or ASTE or FLXS or CMI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) is the stronger pick with 17.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 3% for Cummins Inc. (CMI). Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HIHO or TWIN or ASTE or FLXS or CMI?
On trailing P/E, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the cheapest at 15. 5x versus Cummins Inc. at 33. 3x. On forward P/E, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HIHO or TWIN or ASTE or FLXS or CMI?
Over the past 5 years, Cummins Inc.
(CMI) delivered a total return of +168. 7%, compared to -57. 0% for Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CMI returned +557. 4% versus HIHO's -41. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HIHO or TWIN or ASTE or FLXS or CMI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
70β versus Astec Industries, Inc. 's 1. 63β — meaning ASTE is approximately 134% more volatile than HIHO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 61% for Cummins Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HIHO or TWIN or ASTE or FLXS or CMI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) is pulling ahead at 17.
3% versus -1. 3% for Cummins Inc. (CMI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Astec Industries, Inc. grew EPS 784. 2% year-over-year, compared to -117. 7% for Twin Disc, Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, TWIN leads at 11. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HIHO or TWIN or ASTE or FLXS or CMI?
Cummins Inc.
(CMI) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 4% net margin versus -0. 6% for Twin Disc, Incorporated — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CMI leads at 11. 5% versus -7. 2% for HIHO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HIHO leads at 33. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HIHO or TWIN or ASTE or FLXS or CMI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) trades at 11. 9x forward P/E versus 25. 9x for Cummins Inc. — 14. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FLXS: -2. 1% to $54. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HIHO or TWIN or ASTE or FLXS or CMI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) offers the highest yield at 14. 1%, versus 0. 9% for Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN).
09Is HIHO or TWIN or ASTE or FLXS or CMI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
70), 14. 1% yield). Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HIHO: -41. 1%, ASTE: +22. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HIHO and TWIN and ASTE and FLXS and CMI?
These companies operate in different sectors (HIHO (Industrials) and TWIN (Industrials) and ASTE (Industrials) and FLXS (Consumer Cyclical) and CMI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HIHO is a small-cap high-growth stock; TWIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; ASTE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock; CMI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.