HKD
AMTD Digital Inc.
Software - Application
Market Cap$333M
5Y Perf.-99.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
HKD vs TIGR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A
Financial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$628M
5Y Perf.+70.1%
HKD vs TIGR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | HKD | TIGR |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $333M | $628M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $90M | $392M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $160M | $118M |
| Gross Margin | 64.1% | 65.0% |
| Operating Margin | 33.5% | 35.6% |
| Forward P/E | 7.3x | 6.8x |
| Total Debt | $258M | $180M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29M | $394M |
HKD vs TIGR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
HKD
TIGR
| Stock | Jul 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMTD Digital Inc. (HKD) | 100 | 0.4 | -99.6% |
| UP Fintech Holding … (TIGR) | 100 | 170.1 | +70.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HKD vs TIGR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: HKD leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
HKD
AMTD Digital Inc.
The Income Pick
HKD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.16
- Lower volatility, beta 1.16, current ratio 0.52x
- Beta 1.16, current ratio 0.52x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A
The Banking Pick
TIGR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 43.7%, EPS growth 71.4%
- -39.9% 10Y total return vs HKD's -89.6%
- 43.7% NII/revenue growth vs HKD's -94.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TIGR | 43.7% NII/revenue growth vs HKD's -94.0% |
| Value | TIGR | Lower P/E (6.8x vs 7.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | HKD | 179.1% margin vs TIGR's 15.5% |
| Stability / Safety | HKD | Beta 1.16 vs TIGR's 2.02 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | HKD | -18.0% vs TIGR's -29.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | HKD | 22.3% ROA vs TIGR's 1.6%, ROIC 0.6% vs 13.8% |
HKD vs TIGR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
HKD vs TIGR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTIGRLAGGINGHKD
HKDAMTD Digital Inc.
0leads
TIGRUP Fintech Holding Lt…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs HKDMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
TIGR4/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TIGR4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
TIGR7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TIGR4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TIGR leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TIGR is the larger business by revenue, generating $392M annually — 4.4x HKD's $90M. HKD is the more profitable business, keeping 179.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TIGR's 15.5%.
| Metric | HKDAMTD Digital Inc. | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $90M | $392M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $34M | $225M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $160M | $118M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $102M | $673M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.1% | +65.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +33.5% | +35.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +179.1% | +15.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +113.6% | +2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -37.7% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +176.0% | +12.4% |
TIGR leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
TIGR leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.3x trailing earnings, HKD trades at a 59% valuation discount to TIGR's 17.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TIGR's 2.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HKD's 31.7x.
| Metric | HKDAMTD Digital Inc. | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $333M | $628M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $562M | $414M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.35x | 17.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 31.66x | 2.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 14.20x | 1.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.04x | 1.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 81.49x | 0.76x |
TIGR leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TIGR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HKD delivers a 28.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $18 for TIGR. TIGR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HKD's 1.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TIGR scores 6/9 vs HKD's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | HKDAMTD Digital Inc. | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +28.6% | +17.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +22.3% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.6% | +13.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.7% | +18.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.62x | 0.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $229M | -$214M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $394M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $258M | $180M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.17x | 3.26x |
TIGR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TIGR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TIGR five years ago would be worth $3,769 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,043 for HKD. Over the past 12 months, HKD leads with a -18.0% total return vs TIGR's -29.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TIGR at 30.4% vs HKD's -36.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | HKDAMTD Digital Inc. | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.1% | -38.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -18.0% | -29.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.5% | +121.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.6% | -62.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.6% | -39.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -36.6% | +30.4% |
TIGR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HKD and TIGR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HKD is the less volatile stock with a 1.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TIGR's 2.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TIGR currently trades 47.5% from its 52-week high vs HKD's 30.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | HKDAMTD Digital Inc. | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.16x | 2.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.47 | $13.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.26 | $5.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.9% | +47.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.8 | 52.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 683K | 2.3M |
Evenly matched — HKD and TIGR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | HKDAMTD Digital Inc. | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Sell |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $4.73 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
TIGR leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
Best OverallUP Fintech Holding Ltd. Spo… (TIGR)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
HKD vs TIGR: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HKD or TIGR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is the stronger pick with 43. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -94. 0% for AMTD Digital Inc. (HKD). AMTD Digital Inc. (HKD) offers the better valuation at 7. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) a "Sell" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HKD or TIGR?
On trailing P/E, AMTD Digital Inc.
(HKD) is the cheapest at 7. 3x versus UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A at 17. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HKD or TIGR?
Over the past 5 years, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) delivered a total return of -62. 3%, compared to -89. 6% for AMTD Digital Inc. (HKD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TIGR returned -39. 9% versus HKD's -89. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HKD or TIGR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AMTD Digital Inc.
(HKD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 16β versus UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A's 2. 02β — meaning TIGR is approximately 74% more volatile than HKD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 27% versus 162% for AMTD Digital Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HKD or TIGR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is pulling ahead at 43. 7% versus -94. 0% for AMTD Digital Inc. (HKD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A grew EPS 71. 4% year-over-year, compared to -91. 2% for AMTD Digital Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HKD or TIGR?
AMTD Digital Inc.
(HKD) is the more profitable company, earning 189. 5% net margin versus 15. 5% for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A — meaning it keeps 189. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HKD leads at 51. 7% versus 35. 6% for TIGR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HKD leads at 78. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — HKD or TIGR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is HKD or TIGR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AMTD Digital Inc.
(HKD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 16)). UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HKD: -89. 6%, TIGR: -39. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between HKD and TIGR?
These companies operate in different sectors (HKD (Technology) and TIGR (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HKD is a small-cap deep-value stock; TIGR is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(HKD: -37.7% · TIGR: 43.7%)Net Margin>
%
(HKD: 179.1% · TIGR: 15.5%)P/E Ratio<
x
(HKD: 7.3x · TIGR: 17.9x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.