HLLY vs ORLY vs AZO vs DORM vs LKQ

For growth investors, O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.

(ORLY) is the stronger pick with 6. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 1% for LKQ Corporation (LKQ). LKQ Corporation (LKQ) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Holley Inc. (HLLY) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, LKQ Corporation (LKQ) is the cheapest at 12.

3x versus O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. at 31. 3x. On forward P/E, Holley Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Dorman Products, Inc. wins at 1. 00x versus LKQ Corporation's 4. 10x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.

(ORLY) delivered a total return of +147. 9%, compared to -71. 6% for Holley Inc. (HLLY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ORLY returned +422. 0% versus HLLY's -71. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.

(ORLY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 15β versus Holley Inc. 's 1. 90β — meaning HLLY is approximately 1185% more volatile than ORLY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Dorman Products, Inc. (DORM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 43% versus 116% for Holley Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.

(ORLY) is pulling ahead at 6. 4% versus -3. 1% for LKQ Corporation (LKQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Holley Inc. grew EPS 180. 0% year-over-year, compared to -10. 6% for LKQ Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ORLY leads at 7. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.

(ORLY) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 3% net margin versus 3. 1% for Holley Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ORLY leads at 19. 5% versus 7. 8% for LKQ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AZO leads at 52. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Dorman Products, Inc. (DORM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 00x versus LKQ Corporation's 4. 10x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Holley Inc. (HLLY) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 28. 5x for O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. — 19. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HLLY: 95. 0% to $5. 50.

In this comparison, LKQ (4.

2% yield) pays a dividend. HLLY, ORLY, AZO, DORM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.

(ORLY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 15), +422. 0% 10Y return). Holley Inc. (HLLY) carries a higher beta of 1. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ORLY: +422. 0%, HLLY: -71. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: HLLY is a small-cap deep-value stock; ORLY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AZO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DORM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LKQ is a small-cap deep-value stock. LKQ pays a dividend while HLLY, ORLY, AZO, DORM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.