Gold
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HMY vs SBSW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gold
HMY vs SBSW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Gold |
| Market Cap | $10.98B | $9.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $150.28B | $238.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $26.34B | $-12.39B |
| Gross Margin | 38.3% | 21.2% |
| Operating Margin | 30.9% | 18.9% |
| Forward P/E | 0.4x | 0.2x |
| Total Debt | $2.23B | $44.34B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $13.10B | $17.16B |
HMY vs SBSW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Harmony Gold Mining… (HMY) | 100 | 527.9 | +427.9% |
| Sibanye Stillwater … (SBSW) | 100 | 179.7 | +79.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HMY vs SBSW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HMY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 1.1%
- Rev growth 20.4%, EPS growth 67.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.1%
- 460.0% 10Y total return vs SBSW's 30.7%
SBSW is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (0.2x vs 0.4x)
- +167.2% vs HMY's +11.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.4% revenue growth vs SBSW's 7.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.2x vs 0.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.5% margin vs SBSW's -5.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.90 vs SBSW's 1.27, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs SBSW's 0.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +167.2% vs HMY's +11.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 32.8% ROA vs SBSW's -8.3%, ROIC 40.1% vs 22.9% |
HMY vs SBSW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HMY vs SBSW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HMY leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SBSW is the larger business by revenue, generating $238.3B annually — 1.6x HMY's $150.3B. HMY is the more profitable business, keeping 17.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SBSW's -5.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $150.3B | $238.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $56.7B | $63.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $26.3B | -$12.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $20.4B | -$9.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.3% | +21.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.9% | +18.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.5% | -5.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | -4.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.4% | +25.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.2% | -10.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SBSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SBSW's 5.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HMY's 6.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11.0B | $9.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.3B | $11.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.59x | -31.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.37x | 0.25x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.71x | 5.67x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.43x | 1.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.73x | 3.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.67x | 90.73x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HMY leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HMY delivers a 56.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $56 in annual profit, vs $-28 for SBSW. HMY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SBSW's 1.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HMY scores 8/9 vs SBSW's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +56.1% | -28.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +32.8% | -8.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +40.1% | +22.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +35.3% | +19.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 1.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10.9B | $27.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $13.1B | $17.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.2B | $44.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 44.14x | 1.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HMY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HMY five years ago would be worth $35,231 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,014 for SBSW. Over the past 12 months, SBSW leads with a +167.2% total return vs HMY's +11.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HMY at 51.0% vs SBSW's 12.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.9% | -6.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.3% | +167.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +244.5% | +40.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +252.3% | -19.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +460.0% | +30.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +51.0% | +12.1% |
Risk & Volatility
HMY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HMY is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SBSW's 1.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HMY currently trades 67.5% from its 52-week high vs SBSW's 62.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 1.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.06 | $21.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.58 | $4.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.5% | +62.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.2 | 57.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.2M | 5.7M |
Analyst Outlook
HMY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HMY as "Hold" and SBSW as "Hold". For income investors, HMY offers the higher dividend yield at 1.14% vs SBSW's 0.18%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.27 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.27 | $0.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
HMY leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SBSW leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
HMY vs SBSW: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HMY or SBSW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited (HMY) is the stronger pick with 20.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 1% for Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW). Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited (HMY) offers the better valuation at 12. 6x trailing P/E (0. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited (HMY) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HMY or SBSW?
On forward P/E, Sibanye Stillwater Limited is actually cheaper at 0.
2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HMY or SBSW?
Over the past 5 years, Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited (HMY) delivered a total return of +252.
3%, compared to -19. 9% for Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HMY returned +460. 0% versus SBSW's +30. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HMY or SBSW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited (HMY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
90β versus Sibanye Stillwater Limited's 1. 27β — meaning SBSW is approximately 42% more volatile than HMY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited (HMY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 100% for Sibanye Stillwater Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HMY or SBSW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited (HMY) is pulling ahead at 20.
4% versus 7. 1% for Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited grew EPS 67. 7% year-over-year, compared to 34. 1% for Sibanye Stillwater Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, HMY leads at 20. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HMY or SBSW?
Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited (HMY) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
5% net margin versus -4. 0% for Sibanye Stillwater Limited — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HMY leads at 27. 5% versus 18. 5% for SBSW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HMY leads at 39. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HMY or SBSW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW) trades at 0.
2x forward P/E versus 0. 4x for Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited — 0. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — HMY or SBSW?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited (HMY) offers the highest yield at 1. 1%, versus 0. 2% for Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW).
09Is HMY or SBSW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited (HMY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
90), 1. 1% yield, +460. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HMY: +460. 0%, SBSW: +30. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HMY and SBSW?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HMY is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SBSW is a small-cap quality compounder stock. HMY pays a dividend while SBSW does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.