Coal
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HNRG vs METC vs HCC vs SXC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Coal
Coal
Coal
HNRG vs METC vs HCC vs SXC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Coal | Coal | Coal | Coal |
| Market Cap | $889M | $735M | $4.63B | $621M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $453M | $537M | $1.47B | $1.86B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $23M | $-51M | $138M | $-66M |
| Gross Margin | 17.5% | 2.5% | 38.2% | 6.5% |
| Operating Margin | 9.1% | -10.4% | 9.7% | 2.1% |
| Forward P/E | 42.7x | — | 11.4x | 20.1x |
| Total Debt | $39M | $18M | $271M | $686M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $440M | $300M | $89M |
HNRG vs METC vs HCC vs SXC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hallador Energy Com… (HNRG) | 100 | 2681.9 | +2581.9% |
| Ramaco Resources, I… (METC) | 100 | 545.0 | +445.0% |
| Warrior Met Coal, I… (HCC) | 100 | 623.4 | +523.4% |
| SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC) | 100 | 214.7 | +114.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HNRG vs METC vs HCC vs SXC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HNRG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 16.1%, EPS growth 116.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.1%
- 16.1% revenue growth vs METC's -19.5%
- 5.3% ROA vs METC's -4.5%, ROIC 27.0% vs -17.0%
METC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
HCC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 12.0% 10Y total return vs HNRG's 332.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 12.7%, current ratio 3.19x
- Better valuation composite
- 9.4% margin vs METC's -9.6%
SXC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.91, yield 6.6%
- Beta 0.91, yield 6.6%, current ratio 2.11x
- 6.6% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs METC's 0.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.1% revenue growth vs METC's -19.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.4% margin vs METC's -9.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs METC's 1.07 | |
| Dividends | 6.6% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs METC's 0.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +92.2% vs SXC's -10.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.3% ROA vs METC's -4.5%, ROIC 27.0% vs -17.0% |
HNRG vs METC vs HCC vs SXC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HNRG vs METC vs HCC vs SXC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HCC leads in 2 of 6 categories
SXC leads 2 • HNRG leads 2 • METC leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HCC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SXC is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 4.1x HNRG's $453M. HCC is the more profitable business, keeping 9.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to METC's -9.6%. On growth, HCC holds the edge at +53.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $453M | $537M | $1.5B | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $78M | $13M | $289M | $208M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $23M | -$51M | $138M | -$66M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | -$67M | -$135M | $77M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.5% | +2.5% | +38.2% | +6.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | -10.4% | +9.7% | +2.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | -9.6% | +9.4% | -3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.4% | -12.5% | -9.2% | +4.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.6% | -25.1% | +53.8% | +4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -187.0% | -5.1% | +9.6% | -125.7% |
Valuation Metrics
SXC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.7x trailing earnings, HNRG trades at a 76% valuation discount to HCC's 81.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SXC's 5.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than METC's 25.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $889M | $735M | $4.6B | $621M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $918M | $312M | $4.6B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.66x | -14.34x | 81.27x | -14.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 42.69x | — | 11.40x | 20.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.98x | 25.60x | 19.52x | 5.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.89x | 1.37x | 3.54x | 0.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.13x | 1.52x | 2.16x | 1.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 74.62x | — | — | 14.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HNRG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HNRG delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-11 for METC. METC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SXC's 1.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HNRG scores 6/9 vs SXC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.2% | -10.6% | +6.4% | -9.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.3% | -4.5% | +5.0% | -3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +27.0% | -17.0% | +1.8% | +4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +24.4% | -7.1% | +1.8% | +4.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.24x | 0.04x | 0.13x | 1.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $29M | -$423M | -$29M | $597M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $440M | $300M | $89M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $39M | $18M | $271M | $686M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.31x | -7.17x | 14.30x | 1.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HNRG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HNRG five years ago would be worth $79,620 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,984 for SXC. Over the past 12 months, HCC leads with a +92.2% total return vs SXC's -10.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HNRG at 34.1% vs SXC's 3.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.5% | -21.1% | -1.8% | +1.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.6% | +52.5% | +92.2% | -10.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +141.3% | +57.4% | +132.2% | +10.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +696.2% | +306.1% | +469.2% | +19.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +332.7% | +21.4% | +1201.9% | +68.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.1% | +16.3% | +32.4% | +3.5% |
Risk & Volatility
HCC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HCC is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than METC's 1.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HCC currently trades 83.3% from its 52-week high vs METC's 25.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.99x | 1.07x | 0.57x | 0.91x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.70 | $57.80 | $105.34 | $9.07 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.42 | $8.21 | $40.80 | $5.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.4% | +25.6% | +83.3% | +80.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.7 | 58.3 | 48.6 | 69.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 985K | 1.8M | 848K | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
SXC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HNRG as "Buy", METC as "Buy", HCC as "Hold", SXC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.3% upside for HNRG (target: $28) vs 23.0% for SXC (target: $9). For income investors, SXC offers the higher dividend yield at 6.61% vs HCC's 0.39%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.17 | $20.83 | $112.50 | $9.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 9 | 24 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.6% | +0.4% | +6.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.09 | $0.34 | $0.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
HCC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). SXC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
HNRG vs METC vs HCC vs SXC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HNRG or METC or HCC or SXC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hallador Energy Company (HNRG) is the stronger pick with 16.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 5% for Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC). Hallador Energy Company (HNRG) offers the better valuation at 19. 7x trailing P/E (42. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hallador Energy Company (HNRG) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HNRG or METC or HCC or SXC?
On trailing P/E, Hallador Energy Company (HNRG) is the cheapest at 19.
7x versus Warrior Met Coal, Inc. at 81. 3x. On forward P/E, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HNRG or METC or HCC or SXC?
Over the past 5 years, Hallador Energy Company (HNRG) delivered a total return of +696.
2%, compared to +19. 8% for SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HCC returned +1202% versus METC's +21. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HNRG or METC or HCC or SXC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Warrior Met Coal, Inc.
(HCC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus Ramaco Resources, Inc. 's 1. 07β — meaning METC is approximately 87% more volatile than HCC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 109% for SunCoke Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HNRG or METC or HCC or SXC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hallador Energy Company (HNRG) is pulling ahead at 16.
1% versus -19. 5% for Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hallador Energy Company grew EPS 116. 8% year-over-year, compared to -590. 5% for Ramaco Resources, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HNRG leads at 9. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HNRG or METC or HCC or SXC?
Hallador Energy Company (HNRG) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
9% net margin versus -9. 6% for Ramaco Resources, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HNRG leads at 13. 0% versus -10. 4% for METC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HNRG leads at 18. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HNRG or METC or HCC or SXC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Warrior Met Coal, Inc.
(HCC) trades at 11. 4x forward P/E versus 42. 7x for Hallador Energy Company — 31. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HNRG: 49. 3% to $28. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — HNRG or METC or HCC or SXC?
In this comparison, SXC (6.
6% yield), METC (0. 6% yield), HCC (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. HNRG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HNRG or METC or HCC or SXC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Warrior Met Coal, Inc.
(HCC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57), +1202% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HCC: +1202%, HNRG: +332. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HNRG and METC and HCC and SXC?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HNRG is a small-cap high-growth stock; METC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HCC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SXC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. METC, SXC pay a dividend while HNRG, HCC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.