Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HNST vs CENT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
HNST vs CENT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $420M | $2.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $352M | $3.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $171M |
| Gross Margin | 33.9% | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | -6.1% | 8.2% |
| Forward P/E | 35.3x | 13.5x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $1.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $90M | $882M |
HNST vs CENT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Honest Company,… (HNST) | 100 | 23.6 | -76.4% |
| Central Garden & Pe… (CENT) | 100 | 89.6 | -10.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HNST vs CENT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HNST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth -1.9%, EPS growth -129.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.64, Low D/E 2.9%, current ratio 3.98x
- -1.9% revenue growth vs CENT's -2.2%
CENT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.65
- 161.6% 10Y total return vs HNST's -76.7%
- Beta 0.65, current ratio 3.67x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.9% revenue growth vs CENT's -2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.5x vs 35.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.4% margin vs HNST's -5.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs HNST's 1.64 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +11.8% vs HNST's -22.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs HNST's -8.2%, ROIC 9.1% vs -13.5% |
HNST vs CENT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HNST vs CENT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CENT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CENT is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 9.0x HNST's $352M. CENT is the more profitable business, keeping 5.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HNST's -5.4%. On growth, CENT holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $352M | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$14M | $302M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | $171M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $20M | $282M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.9% | +32.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | +8.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.4% | +5.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +8.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.7% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -101.3% | +30.6% |
Valuation Metrics
CENT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $420M | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $335M | $3.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -26.64x | 15.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 35.29x | 13.55x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 5.04x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.13x | 0.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.44x | 1.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.82x | 8.25x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CENT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CENT delivers a 10.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-11 for HNST. HNST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CENT's 0.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CENT scores 8/9 vs HNST's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.6% | +10.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.2% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.5% | +9.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -10.2% | +8.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.91x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$85M | $558M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $90M | $882M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -16.04x | 1200.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — HNST and CENT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CENT five years ago would be worth $8,277 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,955 for HNST. Over the past 12 months, CENT leads with a +11.8% total return vs HNST's -22.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HNST at 32.6% vs CENT's 9.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +42.9% | +20.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -22.3% | +11.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +133.1% | +30.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.5% | -17.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.7% | +161.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.6% | +9.4% |
Risk & Volatility
CENT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CENT is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HNST's 1.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CENT currently trades 93.3% from its 52-week high vs HNST's 67.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.64x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.55 | $41.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.07 | $28.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.2% | +93.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.1 | 47.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 74K |
Analyst Outlook
CENT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HNST as "Hold" and CENT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 32.4% upside for CENT (target: $51) vs -19.6% for HNST (target: $3).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.00 | $51.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.5% |
CENT leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
HNST vs CENT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HNST or CENT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Honest Company, Inc.
(HNST) is the stronger pick with -1. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT). Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) offers the better valuation at 15. 1x trailing P/E (13. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HNST or CENT?
On forward P/E, Central Garden & Pet Company is actually cheaper at 13.
5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HNST or CENT?
Over the past 5 years, Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) delivered a total return of -17.
2%, compared to -80. 5% for The Honest Company, Inc. (HNST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CENT returned +161. 6% versus HNST's -76. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HNST or CENT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
65β versus The Honest Company, Inc. 's 1. 64β — meaning HNST is approximately 151% more volatile than CENT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Honest Company, Inc. (HNST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 91% for Central Garden & Pet Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HNST or CENT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Honest Company, Inc.
(HNST) is pulling ahead at -1. 9% versus -2. 2% for Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Central Garden & Pet Company grew EPS 57. 4% year-over-year, compared to -129. 1% for The Honest Company, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HNST leads at 5. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HNST or CENT?
Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
2% net margin versus -4. 2% for The Honest Company, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CENT leads at 8. 5% versus -5. 0% for HNST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HNST leads at 33. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HNST or CENT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) trades at 13.
5x forward P/E versus 35. 3x for The Honest Company, Inc. — 21. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CENT: 32. 4% to $51. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HNST or CENT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is HNST or CENT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
65), +161. 6% 10Y return). The Honest Company, Inc. (HNST) carries a higher beta of 1. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CENT: +161. 6%, HNST: -76. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HNST and CENT?
These companies operate in different sectors (HNST (Consumer Cyclical) and CENT (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HNST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CENT is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.