Entertainment
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HOFV vs EPR vs VICI vs PRKS vs LYV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Specialty
REIT - Diversified
Leisure
Entertainment
HOFV vs EPR vs VICI vs PRKS vs LYV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Diversified | Leisure | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $2M | $4.43B | $30.78B | $2.02B | $38.65B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17M | $700M | $4.05B | $1.66B | $25.61B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-63M | $272M | $3.10B | $168M | $84M |
| Gross Margin | 63.0% | 81.2% | 99.2% | 92.3% | 40.3% |
| Operating Margin | -158.0% | 58.3% | 98.7% | 22.0% | 3.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 19.2x | 10.1x | 10.0x | 115.8x |
| Total Debt | $249M | $3.14B | $0.00 | $0.00 | $12.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $432K | $99M | $563M | $100M | $7.11B |
HOFV vs EPR vs VICI vs PRKS vs LYV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Jan 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hall of Fame Resort… (HOFV) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| EPR Properties (EPR) | 100 | 158.1 | +58.1% |
| VICI Properties Inc. (VICI) | 100 | 143.3 | +43.3% |
| United Parks & Reso… (PRKS) | 100 | 201.0 | +101.0% |
| Live Nation Enterta… (LYV) | 100 | 289.9 | +189.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HOFV vs EPR vs VICI vs PRKS vs LYV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, HOFV doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
EPR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 6.6%
- Rev growth 12.1%, EPS growth 105.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, current ratio 1.53x
- Beta 0.35, yield 6.6%, current ratio 1.53x
VICI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and stability.
- 76.7% margin vs HOFV's -366.2%
- Beta 0.22 vs PRKS's 1.54
- 6.7% ROA vs HOFV's -17.6%, ROIC 7.6% vs -6.7%
PRKS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (10.0x vs 115.8x)
LYV is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 6.2% 10Y total return vs VICI's 118.9%
- +24.0% vs HOFV's -50.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.1% FFO/revenue growth vs HOFV's -12.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 115.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 76.7% margin vs HOFV's -366.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs PRKS's 1.54 | |
| Dividends | 6.6% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs VICI's 6.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.0% vs HOFV's -50.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.7% ROA vs HOFV's -17.6%, ROIC 7.6% vs -6.7% |
HOFV vs EPR vs VICI vs PRKS vs LYV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HOFV vs EPR vs VICI vs PRKS vs LYV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VICI leads in 1 of 6 categories
PRKS leads 1 • LYV leads 1 • HOFV leads 0 • EPR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VICI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LYV is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.6B annually — 1497.3x HOFV's $17M. VICI is the more profitable business, keeping 76.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HOFV's -3.7%. On growth, LYV holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17M | $700M | $4.0B | $1.7B | $25.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $582M | $4.0B | $540M | $1.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$63M | $272M | $3.1B | $168M | $84M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | $435M | $2.5B | $263M | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.0% | +81.2% | +99.2% | +92.3% | +40.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -158.0% | +58.3% | +98.7% | +22.0% | +3.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.7% | +38.8% | +76.7% | +10.1% | +0.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -64.5% | +62.1% | +63.0% | +15.8% | +4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.3% | +10.9% | +3.5% | -2.8% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.0% | -5.1% | +60.8% | -44.0% | -4.8% |
Valuation Metrics
PRKS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.0x trailing earnings, VICI trades at a 37% valuation discount to EPR's 17.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRKS's 3.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LYV's 19.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $4.4B | $30.8B | $2.0B | $38.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $251M | $7.5B | $30.2B | $1.9B | $44.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.04x | 17.64x | 11.03x | 12.11x | -692.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.22x | 10.07x | 9.99x | 115.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.33x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.67x | 8.28x | 3.56x | 19.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.11x | 6.16x | 7.68x | 1.22x | 1.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.03x | 1.90x | 1.08x | — | 21.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.51x | 12.27x | 7.68x | 115.84x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — VICI and PRKS each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EPR delivers a 11.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-2 for HOFV. EPR carries lower financial leverage with a 1.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LYV's 6.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EPR scores 5/9 vs HOFV's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | +11.7% | +11.0% | — | +4.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -17.6% | +4.8% | +6.7% | +6.4% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.7% | +5.3% | +7.6% | +25.5% | +19.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.9% | +7.2% | +8.0% | +15.8% | +13.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.45x | 1.35x | — | — | 6.84x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $249M | $3.0B | -$563M | -$100M | $5.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $432,174 | $99M | $563M | $100M | $7.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $249M | $3.1B | $0 | $0 | $12.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.04x | 3.08x | 4.45x | 2.69x | 3.68x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LYV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LYV five years ago would be worth $20,800 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $47 for HOFV. Over the past 12 months, LYV leads with a +24.0% total return vs HOFV's -50.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LYV at 28.8% vs HOFV's -63.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | 0.0% | +16.4% | +3.9% | +2.3% | +14.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -50.0% | +22.0% | -3.4% | -18.7% | +24.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.0% | +61.0% | +2.9% | -34.3% | +113.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | +49.6% | +17.4% | -31.0% | +108.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +28.4% | +118.9% | +103.5% | +622.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -63.1% | +17.2% | +1.0% | -13.1% | +28.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HOFV and LYV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOFV is the less volatile stock with a -0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRKS's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LYV currently trades 94.9% from its 52-week high vs HOFV's 38.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.48x | 0.35x | 0.22x | 1.54x | 0.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.90 | $62.08 | $34.01 | $56.95 | $175.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.24 | $48.11 | $26.55 | $28.77 | $125.34 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +38.9% | +93.2% | +84.7% | +65.1% | +94.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.5 | 57.6 | 53.5 | 54.8 | 63.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 818K | 7.6M | 944K | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EPR and VICI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EPR as "Hold", VICI as "Buy", PRKS as "Buy", LYV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 28.4% upside for PRKS (target: $48) vs 2.2% for EPR (target: $59). For income investors, EPR offers the higher dividend yield at 6.57% vs VICI's 6.06%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $59.13 | $32.00 | $47.60 | $181.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 21 | 26 | 23 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +6.6% | +6.1% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.80 | $1.74 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | +0.8% | +0.1% |
VICI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). PRKS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
HOFV vs EPR vs VICI vs PRKS vs LYV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HOFV or EPR or VICI or PRKS or LYV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, EPR Properties (EPR) is the stronger pick with 12.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 1% for Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV). VICI Properties Inc. (VICI) offers the better valuation at 11. 0x trailing P/E (10. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate VICI Properties Inc. (VICI) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HOFV or EPR or VICI or PRKS or LYV?
On trailing P/E, VICI Properties Inc.
(VICI) is the cheapest at 11. 0x versus EPR Properties at 17. 6x. On forward P/E, United Parks & Resorts Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HOFV or EPR or VICI or PRKS or LYV?
Over the past 5 years, Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
(LYV) delivered a total return of +108. 0%, compared to -99. 5% for Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LYV returned +622. 5% versus HOFV's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HOFV or EPR or VICI or PRKS or LYV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
48β versus United Parks & Resorts Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning PRKS is approximately -421% more volatile than HOFV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, EPR Properties (EPR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 135% versus 7% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HOFV or EPR or VICI or PRKS or LYV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), EPR Properties (EPR) is pulling ahead at 12.
1% versus -12. 1% for Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: EPR Properties grew EPS 105. 0% year-over-year, compared to -108. 8% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HOFV leads at 25. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HOFV or EPR or VICI or PRKS or LYV?
VICI Properties Inc.
(VICI) is the more profitable company, earning 69. 3% net margin versus -263. 4% for Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company — meaning it keeps 69. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VICI leads at 91. 1% versus -139. 9% for HOFV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VICI leads at 99. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HOFV or EPR or VICI or PRKS or LYV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, United Parks & Resorts Inc.
(PRKS) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 115. 8x for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. — 105. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRKS: 28. 4% to $47. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — HOFV or EPR or VICI or PRKS or LYV?
In this comparison, EPR (6.
6% yield), VICI (6. 1% yield) pay a dividend. HOFV, PRKS, LYV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HOFV or EPR or VICI or PRKS or LYV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, VICI Properties Inc.
(VICI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 22), 6. 1% yield, +118. 9% 10Y return). United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS) carries a higher beta of 1. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VICI: +118. 9%, PRKS: +103. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HOFV and EPR and VICI and PRKS and LYV?
These companies operate in different sectors (HOFV (Communication Services) and EPR (Real Estate) and VICI (Real Estate) and PRKS (Consumer Cyclical) and LYV (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HOFV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EPR is a small-cap deep-value stock; VICI is a mid-cap deep-value stock; PRKS is a small-cap deep-value stock; LYV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. EPR, VICI pay a dividend while HOFV, PRKS, LYV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 6%
- Gross Margin > 24%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.