Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HONE vs INDB vs WSFS vs NBTB vs TRMK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
HONE vs INDB vs WSFS vs NBTB vs TRMK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $522M | $3.89B | $3.80B | $2.35B | $2.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $314M | $974M | $1.36B | $867M | $1.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $26M | $180M | $287M | $169M | $224M |
| Gross Margin | 50.9% | 66.4% | 74.7% | 72.1% | 71.0% |
| Operating Margin | 10.9% | 25.4% | 28.0% | 25.3% | 25.5% |
| Forward P/E | 13.3x | 10.7x | 11.8x | 10.8x | 11.5x |
| Total Debt | $517M | $701M | $303M | $327M | $1.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $231M | $220M | $1.33B | $185M | $668M |
HONE vs INDB vs WSFS vs NBTB vs TRMK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Nov 25 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| HarborOne Bancorp, … (HONE) | 100 | 151.8 | +51.8% |
| Independent Bank Co… (INDB) | 100 | 96.9 | -3.1% |
| WSFS Financial Corp… (WSFS) | 100 | 188.3 | +88.3% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 129.2 | +29.2% |
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 156.5 | +56.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HONE vs INDB vs WSFS vs NBTB vs TRMK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HONE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.7%, EPS growth 78.4%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5%
INDB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (10.7x vs 11.5x)
WSFS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 129.0% 10Y total return vs TRMK's 127.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 11.1%, current ratio 0.08x
- PEG 0.67 vs NBTB's 1.53
- Beta 0.89 vs INDB's 1.11, lower leverage
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- Beta 0.89, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.60x
- 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs WSFS's 0.9%
TRMK is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.4% vs HONE's 2.2%
- 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs WSFS's -3.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs WSFS's -3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.7x vs 11.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs INDB's 1.11, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs WSFS's 0.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.7% vs HONE's +7.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
HONE vs INDB vs WSFS vs NBTB vs TRMK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
HONE vs INDB vs WSFS vs NBTB vs TRMK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WSFS leads in 4 of 6 categories
NBTB leads 1 • HONE leads 0 • INDB leads 0 • TRMK leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WSFS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WSFS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 4.3x HONE's $314M. WSFS is the more profitable business, keeping 21.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HONE's 8.7%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $314M | $974M | $1.4B | $867M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $37M | $272M | $408M | $241M | $323M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $26M | $180M | $287M | $169M | $224M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $46M | $209M | $214M | $225M | $230M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.9% | +66.4% | +74.7% | +72.1% | +71.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +25.4% | +28.0% | +25.3% | +25.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.7% | +19.7% | +21.1% | +19.5% | +20.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.8% | +21.5% | +15.7% | +25.2% | +20.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.1% | -31.7% | +22.9% | +39.5% | +5.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HONE and WSFS each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, TRMK trades at a 34% valuation discount to HONE's 18.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WSFS offers better value at 0.81x vs NBTB's 1.92x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $522M | $3.9B | $3.8B | $2.4B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $808M | $4.4B | $2.8B | $2.5B | $3.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.33x | 17.31x | 14.16x | 13.53x | 12.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.30x | 10.74x | 11.79x | 10.80x | 11.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.23x | — | 0.81x | 1.92x | 1.50x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.84x | 15.19x | 6.80x | 10.35x | 9.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.66x | 4.00x | 2.79x | 2.71x | 2.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.87x | 1.11x | 1.44x | 1.21x | 1.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 200.70x | 18.59x | 17.79x | 10.75x | 11.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WSFS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRMK delivers a 10.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $5 for HONE. WSFS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HONE's 0.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs WSFS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.6% | +5.1% | +10.6% | +9.5% | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +0.7% | +1.4% | +1.1% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.3% | +4.7% | +9.5% | +7.9% | +7.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.5% | +5.8% | +10.3% | +2.4% | +3.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.90x | 0.23x | 0.11x | 0.17x | 0.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $285M | $481M | -$1.0B | $142M | $448M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $231M | $220M | $1.3B | $185M | $668M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $517M | $701M | $303M | $327M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.24x | 0.77x | 1.30x | 1.05x | 0.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WSFS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRMK five years ago would be worth $14,756 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,418 for HONE. Over the past 12 months, WSFS leads with a +37.7% total return vs HONE's +7.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WSFS at 33.0% vs NBTB's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | +7.8% | +31.2% | +9.3% | +15.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.9% | +32.7% | +37.7% | +9.0% | +32.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.9% | +77.6% | +135.3% | +54.1% | +118.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.8% | +11.6% | +43.1% | +29.9% | +47.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.3% | +109.5% | +129.0% | +102.2% | +127.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.7% | +21.1% | +33.0% | +15.5% | +29.8% |
Risk & Volatility
WSFS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WSFS is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INDB's 1.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WSFS currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs HONE's 84.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.05x | 1.11x | 0.89x | 0.89x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.29 | $87.00 | $73.22 | $46.92 | $45.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.57 | $57.01 | $49.92 | $39.20 | $33.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.7% | +89.9% | +98.4% | +96.1% | +97.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.5 | 53.5 | 64.0 | 57.3 | 56.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 324K | 385K | 236K | 392K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HONE as "Hold", INDB as "Hold", WSFS as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", TRMK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.7% upside for HONE (target: $14) vs 1.4% for TRMK (target: $46). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs WSFS's 0.95%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $88.33 | $74.67 | $46.00 | $45.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 15 | 13 | 10 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +2.9% | +0.9% | +3.2% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 3 | 1 | 12 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.32 | $2.26 | $0.68 | $1.43 | $0.97 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.1% | +0.8% | +7.6% | +0.4% | +3.0% |
WSFS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NBTB leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
HONE vs INDB vs WSFS vs NBTB vs TRMK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HONE or INDB or WSFS or NBTB or TRMK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 1% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS). Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. (HONE) a "Hold" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HONE or INDB or WSFS or NBTB or TRMK?
On trailing P/E, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the cheapest at 12.
1x versus HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. at 18. 3x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corp. is actually cheaper at 10. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: WSFS Financial Corporation wins at 0. 67x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HONE or INDB or WSFS or NBTB or TRMK?
Over the past 5 years, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) delivered a total return of +47.
6%, compared to -5. 8% for HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. (HONE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WSFS returned +129. 0% versus HONE's +88. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HONE or INDB or WSFS or NBTB or TRMK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
89β versus Independent Bank Corp. 's 1. 11β — meaning INDB is approximately 25% more volatile than WSFS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 90% for HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HONE or INDB or WSFS or NBTB or TRMK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.
8% versus -3. 1% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 78. 4% year-over-year, compared to -16. 6% for Independent Bank Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HONE or INDB or WSFS or NBTB or TRMK?
WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
1% net margin versus 8. 7% for HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WSFS leads at 28. 0% versus 10. 9% for HONE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WSFS leads at 74. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HONE or INDB or WSFS or NBTB or TRMK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 67x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corp. (INDB) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 13. 3x for HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. — 2. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HONE: 15. 7% to $14. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HONE or INDB or WSFS or NBTB or TRMK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 0. 9% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS).
09Is HONE or INDB or WSFS or NBTB or TRMK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
89), 0. 9% yield, +129. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WSFS: +129. 0%, INDB: +109. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HONE and INDB and WSFS and NBTB and TRMK?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HONE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INDB is a small-cap deep-value stock; WSFS is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.