Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HOPE vs BYFC vs CARV vs HAFC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
HOPE vs BYFC vs CARV vs HAFC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.62B | $86M | $9M | $909M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $968M | $63M | $37M | $445M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $59M | $-25M | $-13M | $76M |
| Gross Margin | 48.6% | 51.9% | 56.3% | 57.5% |
| Operating Margin | 8.3% | -38.8% | -36.8% | 24.3% |
| Forward P/E | 11.8x | — | — | 9.6x |
| Total Debt | $396M | $153M | $29M | $280M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $560M | $11M | $50M | $213M |
HOPE vs BYFC vs CARV vs HAFC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) | 100 | 133.1 | +33.1% |
| Broadway Financial … (BYFC) | 100 | 80.3 | -19.7% |
| Carver Bancorp, Inc. (CARV) | 100 | 92.7 | -7.3% |
| Hanmi Financial Cor… (HAFC) | 100 | 336.9 | +236.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HOPE vs BYFC vs CARV vs HAFC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HOPE is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 4.3% yield, vs HAFC's 3.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
BYFC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.02, yield 3.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.02, Low D/E 58.1%, current ratio 0.03x
- Beta 0.02, yield 3.8%, current ratio 0.03x
- Beta 0.02 vs HOPE's 1.10
CARV lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
HAFC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.5%, EPS growth 22.4%
- 74.4% 10Y total return vs HOPE's 18.9%
- NIM 3.0% vs BYFC's 2.5%
- 3.5% NII/revenue growth vs CARV's -8.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.5% NII/revenue growth vs CARV's -8.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CARV's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs HOPE's 1.10 | |
| Dividends | 4.3% yield, vs HAFC's 3.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.6% vs CARV's +14.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CARV's 0.9% |
HOPE vs BYFC vs CARV vs HAFC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
HOPE vs BYFC vs CARV vs HAFC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HAFC leads in 4 of 6 categories
BYFC leads 1 • HOPE leads 0 • CARV leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HAFC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOPE is the larger business by revenue, generating $968M annually — 25.9x CARV's $37M. HAFC is the more profitable business, keeping 17.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BYFC's -39.3%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $968M | $63M | $37M | $445M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $84M | -$24M | -$10M | $110M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $59M | -$25M | -$13M | $76M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $147M | -$13,000 | -$9M | $204M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.6% | +51.9% | +56.3% | +57.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | -38.8% | -36.8% | +24.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | -39.3% | -36.8% | +17.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | -0.0% | -34.6% | +45.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.0% | -46.8% | -12.2% | +20.7% |
Valuation Metrics
HAFC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, HAFC trades at a 56% valuation discount to HOPE's 27.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HAFC's 8.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HOPE's 17.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $86M | $9M | $909M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $228M | -$12M | $977M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.46x | -2.86x | -0.62x | 12.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.80x | — | — | 9.63x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.95x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.35x | — | — | 8.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.67x | 1.36x | 0.23x | 2.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.71x | 0.30x | 0.29x | 1.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.67x | — | — | 4.46x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HAFC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HAFC delivers a 9.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-48 for CARV. HOPE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CARV's 0.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HAFC scores 9/9 vs CARV's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.6% | -9.1% | -48.4% | +9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.3% | -1.9% | -1.9% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.3% | -3.7% | -13.0% | +7.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.9% | -5.6% | -15.4% | +2.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.58x | 0.98x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$164M | $142M | -$21M | $68M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $560M | $11M | $50M | $213M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $396M | $153M | $29M | $280M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.17x | -0.87x | -0.71x | 0.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HAFC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HAFC five years ago would be worth $16,354 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,089 for CARV. Over the past 12 months, BYFC leads with a +43.6% total return vs CARV's +14.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HAFC at 33.4% vs CARV's -27.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.3% | +21.6% | +17.9% | +15.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.6% | +43.6% | +14.6% | +35.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +82.1% | +23.0% | -61.8% | +137.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.3% | -36.5% | -79.1% | +63.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.9% | -41.3% | -54.7% | +74.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.1% | +7.1% | -27.4% | +33.4% |
Risk & Volatility
BYFC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BYFC is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HOPE's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BYFC currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs CARV's 42.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 0.02x | 0.08x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.02 | $9.43 | $3.85 | $31.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.44 | $5.60 | $1.07 | $21.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.0% | +98.1% | +42.9% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.5 | 76.0 | 50.2 | 62.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 897K | 3K | 4K | 265K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HOPE and HAFC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HOPE as "Hold", HAFC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.1% upside for HAFC (target: $35) vs 14.8% for HOPE (target: $15). For income investors, HOPE offers the higher dividend yield at 4.35% vs HAFC's 3.57%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.50 | — | — | $35.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | — | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.3% | +3.8% | — | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.55 | $0.35 | — | $1.09 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.0% |
HAFC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BYFC leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
HOPE vs BYFC vs CARV vs HAFC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HOPE or BYFC or CARV or HAFC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) is the stronger pick with 3.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 3% for Carver Bancorp, Inc. (CARV). Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) a "Hold" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HOPE or BYFC or CARV or HAFC?
On trailing P/E, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) is the cheapest at 12.
1x versus Hope Bancorp, Inc. at 27. 5x. On forward P/E, Hanmi Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HOPE or BYFC or CARV or HAFC?
Over the past 5 years, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) delivered a total return of +63.
5%, compared to -79. 1% for Carver Bancorp, Inc. (CARV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HAFC returned +74. 4% versus CARV's -54. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HOPE or BYFC or CARV or HAFC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Broadway Financial Corporation (BYFC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
02β versus Hope Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning HOPE is approximately 4308% more volatile than BYFC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 98% for Carver Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HOPE or BYFC or CARV or HAFC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) is pulling ahead at 3.
5% versus -8. 3% for Carver Bancorp, Inc. (CARV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hanmi Financial Corporation grew EPS 22. 4% year-over-year, compared to -81. 8% for Broadway Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HOPE or BYFC or CARV or HAFC?
Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) is the more profitable company, earning 17.
1% net margin versus -39. 3% for Broadway Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 17. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HAFC leads at 24. 3% versus -38. 8% for BYFC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HAFC leads at 57. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HOPE or BYFC or CARV or HAFC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) trades at 9.
6x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Hope Bancorp, Inc. — 2. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HAFC: 15. 1% to $35. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HOPE or BYFC or CARV or HAFC?
In this comparison, HOPE (4.
3% yield), BYFC (3. 8% yield), HAFC (3. 6% yield) pay a dividend. CARV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HOPE or BYFC or CARV or HAFC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Broadway Financial Corporation (BYFC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
02), 3. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BYFC: -41. 3%, HOPE: +18. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HOPE and BYFC and CARV and HAFC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HOPE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BYFC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CARV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HAFC is a small-cap deep-value stock. HOPE, BYFC, HAFC pay a dividend while CARV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.