Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HPAIW vs BBAI vs AIOT vs GFAI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Communication Equipment
Security & Protection Services
HPAIW vs BBAI vs AIOT vs GFAI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Information Technology Services | Communication Equipment | Security & Protection Services |
| Market Cap | $9.00 | $19.77B | $464M | $11M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $30M | $127M | $436M | $72M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $-289M | $-32M | $-24M |
| Gross Margin | 62.8% | 25.8% | 55.2% | 15.1% |
| Operating Margin | 31.1% | -68.3% | 1.7% | -27.4% |
| Total Debt | $5M | $24M | $287M | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $87M | $49M | $22M |
HPAIW vs BBAI vs AIOT vs GFAI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Helport AI Limited (HPAIW) | 100 | 40.0 | -60.0% |
| BigBear.ai Holdings… (BBAI) | 100 | 221.4 | +121.4% |
| PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT) | 100 | 61.7 | -38.3% |
| Guardforce AI Co., … (GFAI) | 100 | 36.2 | -63.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HPAIW vs BBAI vs AIOT vs GFAI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HPAIW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.
- 132.4% revenue growth vs BBAI's -19.3%
- 24.9% margin vs BBAI's -226.7%
- 32.1% ROA vs GFAI's -50.2%, ROIC 65.5% vs -41.6%
BBAI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 3.31
- +28.6% vs HPAIW's -76.0%
AIOT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 66.3%, EPS growth 60.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 42.2%
- -28.5% 10Y total return vs BBAI's -57.5%
- 22.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
GFAI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.36, Low D/E 8.1%, current ratio 4.92x
- Beta 2.36, current ratio 4.92x
- Beta 2.36 vs BBAI's 3.31
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 132.4% revenue growth vs BBAI's -19.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.9% margin vs BBAI's -226.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.36 vs BBAI's 3.31 | |
| Dividends | 22.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.6% vs HPAIW's -76.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 32.1% ROA vs GFAI's -50.2%, ROIC 65.5% vs -41.6% |
HPAIW vs BBAI vs AIOT vs GFAI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
HPAIW vs BBAI vs AIOT vs GFAI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HPAIW leads in 3 of 6 categories
BBAI leads 2 • AIOT leads 0 • GFAI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HPAIW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AIOT is the larger business by revenue, generating $436M annually — 14.7x HPAIW's $30M. HPAIW is the more profitable business, keeping 24.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BBAI's -2.3%. On growth, AIOT holds the edge at +47.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $30M | $127M | $436M | $72M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$75M | $69M | -$12M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$289M | -$32M | -$24M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$56M | $3M | -$6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.8% | +25.8% | +55.2% | +15.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.1% | -68.3% | +1.7% | -27.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.9% | -2.3% | -7.4% | -32.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.0% | -44.3% | +0.6% | -8.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -0.9% | +47.4% | +3.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +52.0% | -25.5% | +38.9% |
Valuation Metrics
HPAIW leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, HPAIW's 0.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AIOT's 44.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9 | $19.8B | $464M | $11M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2M | $19.7B | $702M | -$8M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -5.10x | -7.93x | -0.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.20x | — | 44.24x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 154.88x | 1.28x | 0.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 24.51x | 0.92x | 0.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HPAIW leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HPAIW delivers a 78.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $79 in annual profit, vs $-70 for GFAI. BBAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AIOT's 0.64x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HPAIW scores 6/9 vs AIOT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +78.7% | -50.7% | -6.6% | -69.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +32.1% | -35.3% | -3.4% | -50.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +65.5% | -19.5% | -4.3% | -41.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +98.2% | -19.6% | -5.1% | -19.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 0.04x | 0.64x | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | -$63M | $238M | -$19M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $87M | $49M | $22M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $24M | $287M | $3M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 40.57x | -18.17x | 0.47x | -167.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BBAI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AIOT five years ago would be worth $7,149 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $50 for GFAI. Over the past 12 months, BBAI leads with a +28.6% total return vs HPAIW's -76.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BBAI at 14.4% vs GFAI's -59.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -62.3% | -28.4% | -35.0% | -20.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -76.0% | +28.6% | -34.5% | -51.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.8% | +49.8% | -28.5% | -93.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.8% | -57.0% | -28.5% | -99.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.8% | -57.5% | -28.5% | -99.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -39.4% | +14.4% | -10.6% | -59.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HPAIW and AIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HPAIW is the less volatile stock with a -0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBAI's 3.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AIOT currently trades 56.2% from its 52-week high vs HPAIW's 21.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.11x | 3.31x | 2.65x | 2.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.28 | $9.39 | $6.07 | $1.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.06 | $3.01 | $2.77 | $0.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +21.4% | +44.5% | +56.2% | +33.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.5 | 57.1 | 56.0 | 43.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5K | 34.5M | 1.6M | 315K |
Analyst Outlook
BBAI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BBAI as "Hold", AIOT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 134.6% upside for AIOT (target: $8) vs 43.5% for BBAI (target: $6). AIOT is the only dividend payer here at 22.09% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.00 | $8.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 | 5 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +22.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.75 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% |
HPAIW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BBAI leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
HPAIW vs BBAI vs AIOT vs GFAI: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HPAIW or BBAI or AIOT or GFAI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Helport AI Limited (HPAIW) is the stronger pick with 132.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 3% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). Analysts rate PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HPAIW or BBAI or AIOT or GFAI?
Over the past 5 years, PowerFleet, Inc.
(AIOT) delivered a total return of -28. 5%, compared to -99. 5% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AIOT returned -28. 5% versus GFAI's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HPAIW or BBAI or AIOT or GFAI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Helport AI Limited (HPAIW) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
11β versus BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 31β — meaning BBAI is approximately -3054% more volatile than HPAIW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 64% for PowerFleet, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — HPAIW or BBAI or AIOT or GFAI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Helport AI Limited (HPAIW) is pulling ahead at 132.
4% versus -19. 3% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guardforce AI Co. , Limited grew EPS 88. 3% year-over-year, compared to 35. 4% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIOT leads at 42. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — HPAIW or BBAI or AIOT or GFAI?
Helport AI Limited (HPAIW) is the more profitable company, earning 24.
9% net margin versus -230. 2% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HPAIW leads at 31. 1% versus -65. 3% for BBAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HPAIW leads at 62. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — HPAIW or BBAI or AIOT or GFAI?
In this comparison, AIOT (22.
1% yield) pays a dividend. HPAIW, BBAI, GFAI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is HPAIW or BBAI or AIOT or GFAI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Helport AI Limited (HPAIW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
11)). Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HPAIW: -77. 8%, GFAI: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between HPAIW and BBAI and AIOT and GFAI?
These companies operate in different sectors (HPAIW (Technology) and BBAI (Technology) and AIOT (Technology) and GFAI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HPAIW is a small-cap high-growth stock; BBAI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AIOT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GFAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. AIOT pays a dividend while HPAIW, BBAI, GFAI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.