HPP vs DEI

For growth investors, Douglas Emmett, Inc.

(DEI) is the stronger pick with 1. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 3% for Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. (HPP). Douglas Emmett, Inc. (DEI) offers the better valuation at 116. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. (HPP) a "Hold" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc.

(HPP) delivered a total return of -6. 8%, compared to -50. 8% for Douglas Emmett, Inc. (DEI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HPP returned +97. 9% versus DEI's -37. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Douglas Emmett, Inc.

(DEI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 92β versus Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. 's 1. 36β — meaning HPP is approximately 48% more volatile than DEI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. (HPP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 118% versus 160% for Douglas Emmett, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Douglas Emmett, Inc.

(DEI) is pulling ahead at 1. 8% versus -1. 3% for Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. (HPP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. grew EPS 29. 1% year-over-year, compared to -25. 2% for Douglas Emmett, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DEI leads at 0. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Douglas Emmett, Inc.

(DEI) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 6% net margin versus -66. 4% for Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DEI leads at 19. 0% versus -5. 7% for HPP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DEI leads at -16. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, DEI (6.

7% yield) pays a dividend. HPP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Douglas Emmett, Inc.

(DEI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92), 6. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DEI: -37. 6%, HPP: +97. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: HPP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DEI is a small-cap income-oriented stock. DEI pays a dividend while HPP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.