Personal Products & Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HRB vs WEX vs INTU vs FLYW vs BILL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
Information Technology Services
Software - Application
HRB vs WEX vs INTU vs FLYW vs BILL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Personal Products & Services | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Information Technology Services | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $4.69B | $4.91B | $110.62B | $2.06B | $4.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.52B | $2.70B | $20.12B | $188.60B | $1.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $300M | $310M | $4.34B | $12.54B | $-7M |
| Gross Margin | 50.5% | 57.4% | 81.2% | 0.2% | 80.7% |
| Operating Margin | -1.5% | 24.7% | 27.1% | 5.7% | -1.8% |
| Forward P/E | 7.2x | 7.3x | 17.1x | 41.5x | 17.4x |
| Total Debt | $2.35B | $4.86B | $6.64B | $0.00 | $1.77B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.00B | $906M | $2.88B | $330M | $1.14B |
HRB vs WEX vs INTU vs FLYW vs BILL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| H&R Block, Inc. (HRB) | 100 | 148.9 | +48.9% |
| WEX Inc. (WEX) | 100 | 72.3 | -27.7% |
| Intuit Inc. (INTU) | 100 | 90.3 | -9.7% |
| Flywire Corporation (FLYW) | 100 | 50.2 | -49.8% |
| Bill.com Holdings, … (BILL) | 100 | 28.1 | -71.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HRB vs WEX vs INTU vs FLYW vs BILL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HRB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (7.2x vs 17.4x)
- 3.9% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs INTU's 1.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
- 13.6% ROA vs BILL's -0.1%, ROIC 46.4% vs -1.4%
WEX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
INTU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 1.1%
- 316.1% 10Y total return vs HRB's 144.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 33.7%, current ratio 1.36x
- Beta 0.52, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.36x
FLYW ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 26.6%, EPS growth 391.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.1%
- 26.6% revenue growth vs WEX's 1.2%
- +54.9% vs INTU's -38.9%
Among these 5 stocks, BILL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.6% revenue growth vs WEX's 1.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.2x vs 17.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.6% margin vs BILL's -0.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs BILL's 1.88, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.9% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs INTU's 1.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.9% vs INTU's -38.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.6% ROA vs BILL's -0.1%, ROIC 46.4% vs -1.4% |
HRB vs WEX vs INTU vs FLYW vs BILL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HRB vs WEX vs INTU vs FLYW vs BILL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HRB leads in 3 of 6 categories
INTU leads 1 • WEX leads 0 • FLYW leads 0 • BILL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INTU leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $188.6B annually — 124.4x HRB's $1.5B. INTU is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BILL's -0.4%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $2.7B | $20.1B | $188.6B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | $952M | $5.9B | $10.8B | $30M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $300M | $310M | $4.3B | $12.5B | -$7M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $761M | $460M | $6.8B | -$15.8B | $383M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.5% | +57.4% | +81.2% | +0.2% | +80.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.5% | +24.7% | +27.1% | +5.7% | -1.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.8% | +11.5% | +21.6% | +6.6% | -0.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +50.2% | +17.0% | +34.0% | -8.4% | +23.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -99.9% | +5.8% | +17.4% | +1408.6% | +13.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.5% | +22.7% | +47.9% | +4.0% | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
HRB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.4x trailing earnings, HRB trades at a 95% valuation discount to BILL's 181.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HRB's 6.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BILL's 539.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.7B | $4.9B | $110.6B | $2.1B | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.0B | $8.9B | $114.4B | $1.7B | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.42x | 16.72x | 28.99x | 156.64x | 181.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.16x | 7.29x | 17.07x | 41.52x | 17.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.99x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.38x | 8.80x | 19.95x | 46.20x | 539.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.25x | 1.85x | 5.87x | 3.30x | 2.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 57.10x | 4.12x | 5.69x | 2.64x | 1.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.82x | 15.65x | 18.19x | 20.81x | 13.37x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HRB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HRB delivers a 6.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-0 for BILL. INTU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HRB's 26.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INTU scores 9/9 vs WEX's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.7% | +27.0% | +22.8% | +5.9% | -0.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.6% | +2.1% | +12.7% | +4.3% | -0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +46.4% | +9.6% | +16.5% | +2.1% | -1.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +39.4% | +13.4% | +19.2% | +1.3% | -1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 26.41x | 3.94x | 0.34x | — | 0.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | $4.0B | $3.8B | -$330M | $633M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $906M | $2.9B | $330M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.3B | $4.9B | $6.6B | $0 | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.05x | 2.76x | 428.27x | 1.84x | 1.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HRB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HRB five years ago would be worth $18,243 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,944 for BILL. Over the past 12 months, FLYW leads with a +54.9% total return vs INTU's -38.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HRB at 8.7% vs BILL's -24.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.3% | -4.5% | -36.7% | +24.0% | -17.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -33.9% | +11.8% | -38.9% | +54.9% | -12.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.4% | -19.7% | -4.3% | -41.8% | -57.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +82.4% | -27.9% | +5.5% | -50.9% | -70.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +144.0% | +58.0% | +316.1% | -50.9% | +17.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.7% | -7.1% | -1.5% | -16.5% | -24.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HRB and FLYW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HRB is the less volatile stock with a -0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BILL's 1.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLYW currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs INTU's 48.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.06x | 1.07x | 0.52x | 1.48x | 1.88x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $64.62 | $186.85 | $813.70 | $18.05 | $57.21 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.16 | $122.22 | $342.11 | $9.97 | $34.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.2% | +75.8% | +48.7% | +95.5% | +73.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.8 | 38.3 | 51.8 | 83.6 | 46.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 525K | 3.4M | 1.9M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HRB and INTU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HRB as "Hold", WEX as "Hold", INTU as "Buy", FLYW as "Buy", BILL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 68.2% upside for INTU (target: $667) vs 8.8% for FLYW (target: $19). For income investors, HRB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.89% vs INTU's 1.06%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $41.00 | $177.67 | $666.75 | $18.75 | $54.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 32 | 43 | 19 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.9% | — | +1.1% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 2 | 14 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.44 | — | $4.20 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.3% | +16.3% | +2.5% | +3.8% | +10.4% |
HRB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). INTU leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
HRB vs WEX vs INTU vs FLYW vs BILL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HRB or WEX or INTU or FLYW or BILL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Flywire Corporation (FLYW) is the stronger pick with 26.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 2% for WEX Inc. (WEX). H&R Block, Inc. (HRB) offers the better valuation at 8. 4x trailing P/E (7. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intuit Inc. (INTU) a "Buy" — based on 43 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HRB or WEX or INTU or FLYW or BILL?
On trailing P/E, H&R Block, Inc.
(HRB) is the cheapest at 8. 4x versus Bill. com Holdings, Inc. at 181. 9x. On forward P/E, H&R Block, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HRB or WEX or INTU or FLYW or BILL?
Over the past 5 years, H&R Block, Inc.
(HRB) delivered a total return of +82. 4%, compared to -70. 6% for Bill. com Holdings, Inc. (BILL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INTU returned +316. 1% versus FLYW's -50. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HRB or WEX or INTU or FLYW or BILL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), H&R Block, Inc.
(HRB) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 06β versus Bill. com Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 88β — meaning BILL is approximately -3251% more volatile than HRB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intuit Inc. (INTU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 26% for H&R Block, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HRB or WEX or INTU or FLYW or BILL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flywire Corporation (FLYW) is pulling ahead at 26.
6% versus 1. 2% for WEX Inc. (WEX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flywire Corporation grew EPS 391. 1% year-over-year, compared to 6. 6% for H&R Block, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BILL leads at 31. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HRB or WEX or INTU or FLYW or BILL?
Intuit Inc.
(INTU) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 5% net margin versus 1. 6% for Bill. com Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INTU leads at 26. 1% versus -5. 5% for BILL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BILL leads at 81. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HRB or WEX or INTU or FLYW or BILL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, H&R Block, Inc.
(HRB) trades at 7. 2x forward P/E versus 41. 5x for Flywire Corporation — 34. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INTU: 68. 2% to $666. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — HRB or WEX or INTU or FLYW or BILL?
In this comparison, HRB (3.
9% yield), INTU (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. WEX, FLYW, BILL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HRB or WEX or INTU or FLYW or BILL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, H&R Block, Inc.
(HRB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 06), 3. 9% yield, +144. 0% 10Y return). Bill. com Holdings, Inc. (BILL) carries a higher beta of 1. 88 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HRB: +144. 0%, BILL: +17. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HRB and WEX and INTU and FLYW and BILL?
These companies operate in different sectors (HRB (Consumer Cyclical) and WEX (Technology) and INTU (Technology) and FLYW (Technology) and BILL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HRB is a small-cap deep-value stock; WEX is a small-cap deep-value stock; INTU is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock; BILL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. HRB, INTU pay a dividend while WEX, FLYW, BILL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.