Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HRTX vs PACB vs ILMN vs BFLY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Devices
HRTX vs PACB vs ILMN vs BFLY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Devices | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $234M | $498M | $21.07B | $1.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $155M | $160M | $4.39B | $103M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-20M | $-546M | $853M | $-76M |
| Gross Margin | 73.3% | 28.2% | 67.1% | 49.2% |
| Operating Margin | -1.6% | -346.1% | 20.9% | -79.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 27.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $141M | $759M | $2.55B | $20M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29M | $64M | $1.42B | $150M |
HRTX vs PACB vs ILMN vs BFLY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heron Therapeutics,… (HRTX) | 100 | 7.4 | -92.6% |
| Pacific Biosciences… (PACB) | 100 | 37.8 | -62.2% |
| Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) | 100 | 38.2 | -61.8% |
| Butterfly Network, … (BFLY) | 100 | 41.7 | -58.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HRTX vs PACB vs ILMN vs BFLY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HRTX plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
PACB is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 2.43, current ratio 6.89x
ILMN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.23
- 0.7% 10Y total return vs BFLY's -57.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.23, Low D/E 93.8%, current ratio 2.08x
- 19.4% margin vs PACB's -341.5%
BFLY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 8.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.0%
- 19.0% revenue growth vs ILMN's -0.8%
- +94.5% vs HRTX's -45.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.0% revenue growth vs ILMN's -0.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.4% margin vs PACB's -341.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.23 vs BFLY's 3.28 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +94.5% vs HRTX's -45.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.4% ROA vs PACB's -66.8%, ROIC 16.8% vs -45.8% |
HRTX vs PACB vs ILMN vs BFLY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HRTX vs PACB vs ILMN vs BFLY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ILMN leads in 3 of 6 categories
BFLY leads 2 • HRTX leads 0 • PACB leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ILMN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ILMN is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 42.7x BFLY's $103M. ILMN is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PACB's -3.4%. On growth, BFLY holds the edge at +25.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $155M | $160M | $4.4B | $103M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $401,000 | -$169M | $1.1B | -$76M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$20M | -$546M | $853M | -$76M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$28M | -$124M | $989M | -$19M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.3% | +28.2% | +67.1% | +49.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.6% | -3.5% | +20.9% | -79.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.0% | -3.4% | +19.4% | -73.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -18.0% | -77.4% | +22.5% | -18.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.5% | +13.8% | +4.8% | +25.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -183.7% | — | +6.1% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BFLY leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $234M | $498M | $21.1B | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $346M | $1.2B | $22.2B | $979M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.33x | -0.91x | 25.45x | -13.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 27.22x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 6.01x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 19.58x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.51x | 3.11x | 4.86x | 11.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 14.42x | 92.53x | 7.95x | 5.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 22.63x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ILMN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ILMN delivers a 32.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-11 for PACB. BFLY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PACB's 141.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ILMN scores 8/9 vs BFLY's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -140.9% | -11.2% | +32.8% | -36.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.9% | -66.8% | +13.4% | -25.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.6% | -45.8% | +16.8% | -76.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.7% | -58.0% | +17.6% | -39.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 9.81x | 141.98x | 0.94x | 0.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $112M | $696M | $1.1B | -$130M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $64M | $1.4B | $150M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $141M | $759M | $2.6B | $20M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.97x | -77.95x | 12.09x | -71.59x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BFLY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ILMN five years ago would be worth $3,717 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $663 for PACB. Over the past 12 months, BFLY leads with a +94.5% total return vs HRTX's -45.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BFLY at 26.2% vs PACB's -48.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.6% | -10.3% | +3.2% | +13.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -45.1% | +46.0% | +81.7% | +94.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.2% | -86.5% | -27.1% | +100.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.5% | -93.4% | -62.8% | -65.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.8% | -81.3% | +0.7% | -57.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.2% | -48.7% | -10.0% | +26.2% |
Risk & Volatility
ILMN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ILMN is the less volatile stock with a 1.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BFLY's 3.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ILMN currently trades 89.2% from its 52-week high vs HRTX's 50.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.81x | 2.41x | 1.20x | 3.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.48 | $2.73 | $155.53 | $5.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.74 | $0.85 | $73.86 | $1.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.0% | +60.4% | +89.2% | +74.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.2 | 60.2 | 65.2 | 46.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 5.9M | 1.5M | 6.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HRTX as "Buy", PACB as "Buy", ILMN as "Buy", BFLY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 437.9% upside for HRTX (target: $7) vs -39.4% for PACB (target: $1).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.67 | $1.00 | $147.38 | $5.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 18 | 50 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.5% | 0.0% |
ILMN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BFLY leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
HRTX vs PACB vs ILMN vs BFLY: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HRTX or PACB or ILMN or BFLY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Butterfly Network, Inc.
(BFLY) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 8% for Illumina, Inc. (ILMN). Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) offers the better valuation at 25. 5x trailing P/E (27. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Heron Therapeutics, Inc. (HRTX) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HRTX or PACB or ILMN or BFLY?
Over the past 5 years, Illumina, Inc.
(ILMN) delivered a total return of -62. 8%, compared to -93. 4% for Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. (PACB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ILMN returned +3. 0% versus HRTX's -93. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HRTX or PACB or ILMN or BFLY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Illumina, Inc.
(ILMN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 20β versus Butterfly Network, Inc. 's 3. 23β — meaning BFLY is approximately 168% more volatile than ILMN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 142% for Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — HRTX or PACB or ILMN or BFLY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Butterfly Network, Inc.
(BFLY) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus -0. 8% for Illumina, Inc. (ILMN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Illumina, Inc. grew EPS 170. 9% year-over-year, compared to -70. 1% for Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HRTX leads at 12. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — HRTX or PACB or ILMN or BFLY?
Illumina, Inc.
(ILMN) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 6% net margin versus -341. 5% for Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ILMN leads at 19. 9% versus -348. 5% for PACB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HRTX leads at 73. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is HRTX or PACB or ILMN or BFLY more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HRTX: 437.
9% to $6. 67.
07Which pays a better dividend — HRTX or PACB or ILMN or BFLY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is HRTX or PACB or ILMN or BFLY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Illumina, Inc.
(ILMN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 20)). Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. (PACB) carries a higher beta of 2. 41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ILMN: +3. 0%, PACB: -84. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between HRTX and PACB and ILMN and BFLY?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HRTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PACB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ILMN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BFLY is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.