Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HTB vs NBTB vs TRMK vs IBCP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
HTB vs NBTB vs TRMK vs IBCP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $772M | $2.35B | $2.64B | $699M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $292M | $867M | $1.12B | $315M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $64M | $169M | $224M | $69M |
| Gross Margin | 70.5% | 72.1% | 71.0% | 69.6% |
| Operating Margin | 27.7% | 25.3% | 25.5% | 25.8% |
| Forward P/E | 12.6x | 10.8x | 11.5x | 9.6x |
| Total Debt | $175M | $327M | $1.12B | $117M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $185M | $668M | $52M |
HTB vs NBTB vs TRMK vs IBCP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| HomeTrust Bancshare… (HTB) | 100 | 297.7 | +197.7% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 188.7 | +88.7% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 245.7 | +145.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HTB vs NBTB vs TRMK vs IBCP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HTB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 0.40 vs IBCP's 1.82
- NIM 3.9% vs NBTB's 3.1%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 0.77 vs TRMK's 0.94, lower leverage
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs HTB's 1.1%
TRMK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs HTB's -0.9%
- +32.5% vs NBTB's +9.0%
IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 184.6% 10Y total return vs HTB's 166.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
- Beta 0.83, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
- Lower P/E (9.6x vs 11.5x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs HTB's -0.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 11.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.77 vs TRMK's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs HTB's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.5% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
HTB vs NBTB vs TRMK vs IBCP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
HTB vs NBTB vs TRMK vs IBCP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories
IBCP leads 2 • HTB leads 1 • TRMK leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 3.8x HTB's $292M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 22.0% (HTB) to 19.5% (NBTB).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $292M | $867M | $1.1B | $315M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $91M | $241M | $323M | $89M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $64M | $169M | $224M | $69M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $43M | $225M | $230M | $70M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.5% | +72.1% | +71.0% | +69.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.7% | +25.3% | +25.5% | +25.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | +19.5% | +20.0% | +21.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +25.2% | +20.7% | +22.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.4% | +39.5% | +5.4% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
IBCP leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.4x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 23% valuation discount to NBTB's 13.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HTB offers better value at 0.39x vs IBCP's 1.97x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $772M | $2.4B | $2.6B | $699M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $933M | $2.5B | $3.1B | $764M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.34x | 13.53x | 12.13x | 10.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.63x | 10.80x | 11.50x | 9.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.39x | 1.92x | 1.50x | 1.97x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.13x | 10.35x | 9.49x | 9.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.64x | 2.71x | 2.36x | 2.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.31x | 1.21x | 1.28x | 1.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 38.81x | 10.75x | 11.39x | 9.96x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $10 for NBTB. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRMK's 0.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs HTB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.0% | +9.5% | +10.8% | +14.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +1.1% | +1.2% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.1% | +7.9% | +7.1% | +10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.3% | +2.4% | +3.2% | +2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 0.17x | 0.53x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $161M | $142M | $448M | $65M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $185M | $668M | $52M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $175M | $327M | $1.1B | $117M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.27x | 1.05x | 0.75x | 0.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HTB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HTB five years ago would be worth $17,503 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,989 for NBTB. Over the past 12 months, TRMK leads with a +32.5% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HTB at 35.1% vs NBTB's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.5% | +9.3% | +15.5% | +7.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.4% | +9.0% | +32.5% | +12.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +146.8% | +54.1% | +118.5% | +130.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.0% | +29.9% | +47.6% | +63.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +166.6% | +102.2% | +127.7% | +184.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.1% | +15.5% | +29.8% | +32.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HTB and TRMK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HTB is the less volatile stock with a 0.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRMK's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRMK currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs IBCP's 90.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 0.89x | 0.94x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $47.64 | $46.92 | $45.99 | $37.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $34.66 | $39.20 | $33.39 | $29.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.4% | +96.1% | +97.6% | +90.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.7 | 57.3 | 56.0 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 71K | 236K | 392K | 176K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HTB as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", TRMK as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 11.9% upside for IBCP (target: $38) vs 1.4% for TRMK (target: $46). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs HTB's 1.07%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.00 | $45.50 | $38.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +3.2% | +2.2% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 12 | 1 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.49 | $1.43 | $0.97 | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.9% | +0.4% | +3.0% | +1.8% |
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). IBCP leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
HTB vs NBTB vs TRMK vs IBCP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HTB or NBTB or TRMK or IBCP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. (HTB). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 4x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. (HTB) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HTB or NBTB or TRMK or IBCP?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
4x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. at 13. 5x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. wins at 0. 40x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 82x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HTB or NBTB or TRMK or IBCP?
Over the past 5 years, HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc.
(HTB) delivered a total return of +75. 0%, compared to +29. 9% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBCP returned +184. 6% versus NBTB's +102. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HTB or NBTB or TRMK or IBCP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc.
(HTB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 77β versus Trustmark Corporation's 0. 94β — meaning TRMK is approximately 23% more volatile than HTB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 53% for Trustmark Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HTB or NBTB or TRMK or IBCP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.
8% versus -0. 9% for HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. (HTB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 16. 3% year-over-year, compared to 1. 9% for Trustmark Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HTB or NBTB or TRMK or IBCP?
HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc.
(HTB) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 0% net margin versus 19. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HTB leads at 27. 7% versus 25. 3% for NBTB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HTB or NBTB or TRMK or IBCP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. (HTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 40x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 82x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 12. 6x for HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. — 3. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IBCP: 11. 9% to $38. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HTB or NBTB or TRMK or IBCP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 1. 1% for HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. (HTB).
09Is HTB or NBTB or TRMK or IBCP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc.
(HTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 77), 1. 1% yield, +166. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HTB: +166. 6%, TRMK: +127. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HTB and NBTB and TRMK and IBCP?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.