Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HTBK vs HAFC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
HTBK vs HAFC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $828M | $908M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $266M | $445M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $48M | $76M |
| Gross Margin | 72.6% | 57.5% |
| Operating Margin | 25.4% | 24.3% |
| Forward P/E | 13.3x | 9.6x |
| Total Debt | $40M | $280M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $22M | $213M |
HTBK vs HAFC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heritage Commerce C… (HTBK) | 100 | 165.4 | +65.4% |
| Hanmi Financial Cor… (HAFC) | 100 | 291.9 | +191.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HTBK vs HAFC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HTBK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 5.8%, EPS growth 18.2%
- NIM 3.2% vs HAFC's 3.0%
- 5.8% NII/revenue growth vs HAFC's 3.5%
HAFC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 3.6%
- 76.5% 10Y total return vs HTBK's 75.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 35.2%, current ratio 49.21x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.8% NII/revenue growth vs HAFC's 3.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 13.3x), PEG 0.76 vs 2.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs HTBK's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.92 vs HTBK's 1.04 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, vs HAFC's 3.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.4% vs HAFC's +36.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs HTBK's 0.5% |
HTBK vs HAFC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HTBK vs HAFC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HTBK leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HAFC is the larger business by revenue, generating $445M annually — 1.7x HTBK's $266M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 18.0% (HTBK) to 17.1% (HAFC).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $266M | $445M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $71M | $110M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $48M | $76M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $61M | $204M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.6% | +57.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.4% | +24.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +17.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.8% | +45.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +47.1% | +20.7% |
Valuation Metrics
HAFC leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, HAFC trades at a 30% valuation discount to HTBK's 17.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HAFC offers better value at 0.95x vs HTBK's 3.00x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $828M | $908M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $847M | $976M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.24x | 12.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.32x | 9.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.00x | 0.95x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.89x | 8.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.11x | 2.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.17x | 1.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.63x | 4.46x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HTBK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HAFC delivers a 9.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $7 for HTBK. HTBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HAFC's 0.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HAFC scores 9/9 vs HTBK's 8/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.8% | +9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.9% | +7.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.1% | +2.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $18M | $68M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $22M | $213M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $40M | $280M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.95x | 0.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HAFC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HAFC five years ago would be worth $16,465 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,069 for HTBK. Over the past 12 months, HTBK leads with a +53.4% total return vs HAFC's +36.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HAFC at 33.4% vs HTBK's 29.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.7% | +15.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +53.4% | +36.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +116.3% | +137.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.7% | +64.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.1% | +76.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +29.3% | +33.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HTBK and HAFC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HAFC is the less volatile stock with a 0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HTBK's 1.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.83 | $31.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.92 | $21.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.3% | +97.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.5 | 64.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 737K | 265K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HTBK and HAFC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HTBK as "Hold" and HAFC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.2% upside for HAFC (target: $35) vs 7.8% for HTBK (target: $15). For income investors, HTBK offers the higher dividend yield at 3.85% vs HAFC's 3.57%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.50 | $35.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.8% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.52 | $1.09 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +1.0% |
HTBK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HAFC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
HTBK vs HAFC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HTBK or HAFC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Heritage Commerce Corp (HTBK) is the stronger pick with 5.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 5% for Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC). Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Heritage Commerce Corp (HTBK) a "Hold" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HTBK or HAFC?
On trailing P/E, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) is the cheapest at 12.
1x versus Heritage Commerce Corp at 17. 2x. On forward P/E, Hanmi Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Hanmi Financial Corporation wins at 0. 76x versus Heritage Commerce Corp's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HTBK or HAFC?
Over the past 5 years, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) delivered a total return of +64.
7%, compared to +30. 7% for Heritage Commerce Corp (HTBK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HAFC returned +76. 5% versus HTBK's +75. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HTBK or HAFC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
92β versus Heritage Commerce Corp's 1. 04β — meaning HTBK is approximately 13% more volatile than HAFC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Heritage Commerce Corp (HTBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 35% for Hanmi Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HTBK or HAFC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Heritage Commerce Corp (HTBK) is pulling ahead at 5.
8% versus 3. 5% for Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hanmi Financial Corporation grew EPS 22. 4% year-over-year, compared to 18. 2% for Heritage Commerce Corp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HTBK or HAFC?
Heritage Commerce Corp (HTBK) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
0% net margin versus 17. 1% for Hanmi Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 18. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HTBK leads at 25. 4% versus 24. 3% for HAFC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HTBK leads at 72. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HTBK or HAFC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 76x versus Heritage Commerce Corp's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 13. 3x for Heritage Commerce Corp — 3. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HAFC: 15. 2% to $35. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HTBK or HAFC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Heritage Commerce Corp (HTBK) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 3. 6% for Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC).
09Is HTBK or HAFC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
92), 3. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HAFC: +76. 5%, HTBK: +75. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HTBK and HAFC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.