Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HTCR vs HUBS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
HTCR vs HUBS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $209K | $12.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13M | $3.30B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $100M |
| Gross Margin | 40.3% | 83.7% |
| Operating Margin | -17.1% | 1.9% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 19.6x |
| Total Debt | $756K | $485M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $882M |
HTCR vs HUBS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| HeartCore Enterpris… (HTCR) | 100 | 0.4 | -99.7% |
| HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) | 100 | 46.5 | -53.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HTCR vs HUBS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HTCR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.85, Low D/E 10.4%, current ratio 1.58x
- Lower P/E (0.0x vs 19.6x)
- 43.8% margin vs HUBS's 3.0%
HUBS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.18
- Rev growth 19.2%, EPS growth 8.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.8%
- 469.1% 10Y total return vs HTCR's -99.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.2% revenue growth vs HTCR's -70.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 19.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.8% margin vs HUBS's 3.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.18 vs HTCR's 1.85 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -62.0% vs HTCR's -97.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 46.2% ROA vs HUBS's 2.7%, ROIC -39.9% vs 0.4% |
HTCR vs HUBS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HTCR vs HUBS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HUBS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HUBS is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.3B annually — 249.1x HTCR's $13M. HTCR is the more profitable business, keeping 43.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HUBS's 3.0%. On growth, HUBS holds the edge at +23.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13M | $3.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $166M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6M | $100M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $712M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.3% | +83.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -17.1% | +1.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +43.8% | +3.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -27.7% | +21.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.4% | +23.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +163.6% | +2.5% |
Valuation Metrics
HTCR leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.0x trailing earnings, HTCR trades at a 100% valuation discount to HUBS's 284.1x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $209,080 | $12.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$1M | $12.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.04x | 284.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.00x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 69.24x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 4.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.03x | 6.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 17.77x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HUBS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HTCR delivers a 151.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $152 in annual profit, vs $5 for HUBS. HTCR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HUBS's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HUBS scores 6/9 vs HTCR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +151.8% | +5.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +46.2% | +2.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -39.9% | +0.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -41.7% | +0.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$397M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $882M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $756,179 | $485M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -38.03x | 4753.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HUBS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HUBS five years ago would be worth $4,794 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $34 for HTCR. Over the past 12 months, HUBS leads with a -62.0% total return vs HTCR's -97.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HUBS at -18.1% vs HTCR's -74.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -97.4% | -36.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -97.2% | -62.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.3% | -45.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -52.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | +469.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -74.3% | -18.1% |
Risk & Volatility
HUBS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HUBS is the less volatile stock with a 1.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HTCR's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HUBS currently trades 35.8% from its 52-week high vs HTCR's 0.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.85x | 1.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $668.00 | $682.57 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.29 | $187.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.5% | +35.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 16.7 | 51.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 36K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
HTCR is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $360.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $51.92 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.0% |
HUBS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HTCR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
HTCR vs HUBS: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HTCR or HUBS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HubSpot, Inc.
(HUBS) is the stronger pick with 19. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -70. 5% for HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. (HTCR). HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. (HTCR) offers the better valuation at 0. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) a "Buy" — based on 47 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HTCR or HUBS?
On trailing P/E, HeartCore Enterprises, Inc.
(HTCR) is the cheapest at 0. 0x versus HubSpot, Inc. at 284. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HTCR or HUBS?
Over the past 5 years, HubSpot, Inc.
(HUBS) delivered a total return of -52. 1%, compared to -99. 7% for HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. (HTCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HUBS returned +469. 1% versus HTCR's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HTCR or HUBS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), HubSpot, Inc.
(HUBS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 18β versus HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning HTCR is approximately 56% more volatile than HUBS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. (HTCR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 23% for HubSpot, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HTCR or HUBS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HubSpot, Inc.
(HUBS) is pulling ahead at 19. 2% versus -70. 5% for HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. (HTCR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HubSpot, Inc. grew EPS 863. 0% year-over-year, compared to 411. 2% for HeartCore Enterprises, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HUBS leads at 21. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HTCR or HUBS?
HeartCore Enterprises, Inc.
(HTCR) is the more profitable company, earning 64. 6% net margin versus 1. 5% for HubSpot, Inc. — meaning it keeps 64. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HUBS leads at 0. 4% versus -33. 2% for HTCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUBS leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — HTCR or HUBS?
In this comparison, HTCR (100.
0% yield) pays a dividend. HUBS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is HTCR or HUBS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, HubSpot, Inc.
(HUBS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 18), +469. 1% 10Y return). HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. (HTCR) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HUBS: +469. 1%, HTCR: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between HTCR and HUBS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HTCR is a small-cap deep-value stock; HUBS is a mid-cap high-growth stock. HTCR pays a dividend while HUBS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.