Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HTCR vs MSFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
HTCR vs MSFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $209K | $3.13T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13M | $318.27B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $125.22B |
| Gross Margin | 40.3% | 68.3% |
| Operating Margin | -17.1% | 46.8% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $756K | $112.18B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $30.24B |
HTCR vs MSFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| HeartCore Enterpris… (HTCR) | 100 | 0.4 | -99.7% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 140.9 | +40.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HTCR vs MSFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HTCR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.85, Low D/E 10.4%, current ratio 1.58x
- PEG 0.00 vs MSFT's 1.35
- Beta 1.85, yield 100.0%, current ratio 1.58x
MSFT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.8%
- Rev growth 14.9%, EPS growth 15.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.4%
- 7.9% 10Y total return vs HTCR's -99.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.9% revenue growth vs HTCR's -70.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.00 vs 1.35 | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.8% margin vs MSFT's 39.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs HTCR's 1.85 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MSFT's 0.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -2.1% vs HTCR's -97.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 46.2% ROA vs MSFT's 19.2%, ROIC -39.9% vs 24.9% |
HTCR vs MSFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HTCR vs MSFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT is the larger business by revenue, generating $318.3B annually — 24043.2x HTCR's $13M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 43.8% (HTCR) to 39.3% (MSFT). On growth, MSFT holds the edge at +18.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13M | $318.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $192.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6M | $125.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $72.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.3% | +68.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -17.1% | +46.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +43.8% | +39.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -27.7% | +22.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.4% | +18.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +163.6% | +23.4% |
Valuation Metrics
HTCR leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.0x trailing earnings, HTCR trades at a 100% valuation discount to MSFT's 30.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HTCR offers better value at 0.00x vs MSFT's 1.64x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $209,080 | $3.13T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$1M | $3.21T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.04x | 30.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 25.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.00x | 1.64x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 19.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 11.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.03x | 9.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 43.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HTCR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HTCR delivers a 151.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $152 in annual profit, vs $33 for MSFT. HTCR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MSFT's 0.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MSFT scores 6/9 vs HTCR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +151.8% | +33.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +46.2% | +19.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -39.9% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -41.7% | +29.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $81.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $30.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $756,179 | $112.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -38.03x | 55.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MSFT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MSFT five years ago would be worth $17,246 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $34 for HTCR. Over the past 12 months, MSFT leads with a -2.1% total return vs HTCR's -97.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MSFT at 11.7% vs HTCR's -74.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -97.4% | -10.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -97.2% | -2.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.3% | +39.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | +72.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | +787.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -74.3% | +11.7% |
Risk & Volatility
MSFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HTCR's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSFT currently trades 75.8% from its 52-week high vs HTCR's 0.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.85x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $668.00 | $555.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.29 | $356.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.5% | +75.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 16.7 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 36K | 32.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HTCR and MSFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, HTCR offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs MSFT's 0.77%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $551.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 81 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 19 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $51.92 | $3.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% |
MSFT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). HTCR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
HTCR vs MSFT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HTCR or MSFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger pick with 14.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -70. 5% for HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. (HTCR). HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. (HTCR) offers the better valuation at 0. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) a "Buy" — based on 81 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HTCR or MSFT?
On trailing P/E, HeartCore Enterprises, Inc.
(HTCR) is the cheapest at 0. 0x versus Microsoft Corporation at 30. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HTCR or MSFT?
Over the past 5 years, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) delivered a total return of +72.
5%, compared to -99. 7% for HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. (HTCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSFT returned +787. 7% versus HTCR's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HTCR or MSFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
89β versus HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning HTCR is approximately 109% more volatile than MSFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. (HTCR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 33% for Microsoft Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HTCR or MSFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is pulling ahead at 14.
9% versus -70. 5% for HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. (HTCR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. grew EPS 411. 2% year-over-year, compared to 15. 6% for Microsoft Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MSFT leads at 12. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HTCR or MSFT?
HeartCore Enterprises, Inc.
(HTCR) is the more profitable company, earning 64. 6% net margin versus 36. 1% for Microsoft Corporation — meaning it keeps 64. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -33. 2% for HTCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSFT leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — HTCR or MSFT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. (HTCR) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 0. 8% for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT).
08Is HTCR or MSFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
89), 0. 8% yield, +787. 7% 10Y return). HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. (HTCR) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +787. 7%, HTCR: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between HTCR and MSFT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HTCR is a small-cap deep-value stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.