Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HTCR vs SPSC vs ORCL vs HUBS vs SAP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
Software - Application
HTCR vs SPSC vs ORCL vs HUBS vs SAP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $209K | $2.14B | $559.27B | $12.58B | $203.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13M | $762M | $64.08B | $3.30B | $36.80B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $91M | $16.21B | $100M | $7.04B |
| Gross Margin | 40.3% | 68.0% | 66.4% | 83.7% | 73.8% |
| Operating Margin | -17.1% | 15.3% | 30.8% | 1.9% | 26.7% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 11.9x | 26.2x | 15.2x | 23.7x |
| Total Debt | $756K | $10M | $104.10B | $485M | $8.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $151M | $10.79B | $882M | $8.22B |
HTCR vs SPSC vs ORCL vs HUBS vs SAP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| HeartCore Enterpris… (HTCR) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) | 100 | 43.5 | -56.5% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | 100 | 257.9 | +157.9% |
| HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) | 100 | 37.6 | -62.4% |
| SAP SE (SAP) | 100 | 154.3 | +54.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HTCR vs SPSC vs ORCL vs HUBS vs SAP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HTCR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.00 vs ORCL's 3.69
- Lower P/E (0.0x vs 23.7x), PEG 0.00 vs 3.58
- 43.8% margin vs HUBS's 3.0%
- 100.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs ORCL's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
SPSC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 1.74x
ORCL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 425.1% 10Y total return vs HUBS's 469.1%
- +31.6% vs HTCR's -97.2%
HUBS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 19.2%, EPS growth 8.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.8%
- 19.2% revenue growth vs HTCR's -70.5%
SAP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 1.5%
- Beta 0.89, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.17x
- Beta 0.89 vs HTCR's 1.85
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.2% revenue growth vs HTCR's -70.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 23.7x), PEG 0.00 vs 3.58 | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.8% margin vs HUBS's 3.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs HTCR's 1.85 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs ORCL's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.6% vs HTCR's -97.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 46.2% ROA vs HUBS's 2.7%, ROIC -39.9% vs 0.4% |
HTCR vs SPSC vs ORCL vs HUBS vs SAP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HTCR vs SPSC vs ORCL vs HUBS vs SAP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HUBS leads in 1 of 6 categories
HTCR leads 1 • ORCL leads 1 • SPSC leads 0 • SAP leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HUBS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ORCL is the larger business by revenue, generating $64.1B annually — 4840.6x HTCR's $13M. HTCR is the more profitable business, keeping 43.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HUBS's 3.0%. On growth, HUBS holds the edge at +23.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13M | $762M | $64.1B | $3.3B | $36.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $162M | $26.5B | $166M | $11.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6M | $91M | $16.2B | $100M | $7.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $167M | -$24.7B | $712M | $8.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.3% | +68.0% | +66.4% | +83.7% | +73.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -17.1% | +15.3% | +30.8% | +1.9% | +26.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +43.8% | +11.9% | +25.3% | +3.0% | +19.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -27.7% | +21.9% | -38.6% | +21.6% | +22.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.4% | +5.8% | +21.7% | +23.4% | +3.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +163.6% | -8.6% | +24.5% | +2.5% | +15.4% |
Valuation Metrics
HTCR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.0x trailing earnings, HTCR trades at a 100% valuation discount to HUBS's 284.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HTCR offers better value at 0.00x vs ORCL's 6.31x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $209,080 | $2.1B | $559.3B | $12.6B | $203.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$1M | $2.0B | $652.6B | $12.2B | $203.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.04x | 23.24x | 44.82x | 284.08x | 24.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.93x | 26.18x | 15.21x | 23.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.00x | 1.62x | 6.31x | — | 3.76x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.30x | 27.36x | 69.24x | 15.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 2.84x | 9.74x | 4.02x | 4.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.03x | 2.23x | 26.59x | 6.29x | 3.86x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.04x | — | 17.77x | 21.83x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — HTCR and SAP each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HTCR delivers a 151.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $152 in annual profit, vs $5 for HUBS. SPSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ORCL's 4.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SAP scores 9/9 vs HTCR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +151.8% | +9.5% | +56.3% | +5.0% | +15.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +46.2% | +7.9% | +8.1% | +2.7% | +9.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -39.9% | +12.2% | +12.8% | +0.4% | +16.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -41.7% | +12.5% | +14.4% | +0.5% | +18.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.01x | 4.96x | 0.23x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$141M | $93.3B | -$397M | -$149M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $151M | $10.8B | $882M | $8.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $756,179 | $10M | $104.1B | $485M | $8.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -38.03x | — | 5.44x | 4753.07x | 8.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ORCL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ORCL five years ago would be worth $25,183 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $34 for HTCR. Over the past 12 months, ORCL leads with a +31.6% total return vs HTCR's -97.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ORCL at 27.3% vs HTCR's -74.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -97.4% | -35.0% | -0.1% | -36.1% | -25.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -97.2% | -59.7% | +31.6% | -62.0% | -39.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.3% | -62.6% | +106.5% | -45.1% | +35.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -41.9% | +151.8% | -52.1% | +33.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | +119.8% | +425.1% | +469.1% | +151.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -74.3% | -28.0% | +27.3% | -18.1% | +10.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ORCL and SAP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SAP is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HTCR's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ORCL currently trades 56.3% from its 52-week high vs HTCR's 0.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.78x | 0.97x | 1.58x | 1.01x | 0.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $668.00 | $153.16 | $345.72 | $682.57 | $313.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.29 | $50.56 | $134.57 | $187.45 | $160.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.5% | +37.3% | +56.3% | +35.8% | +55.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 16.7 | 46.9 | 68.5 | 51.1 | 48.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 36K | 605K | 26.3M | 1.5M | 3.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HTCR and ORCL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SPSC as "Hold", ORCL as "Buy", HUBS as "Buy", SAP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 124.2% upside for SAP (target: $392) vs 20.2% for SPSC (target: $69). For income investors, HTCR offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs ORCL's 0.85%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $68.71 | $257.09 | $306.10 | $391.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 23 | 86 | 47 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | — | +0.9% | — | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | 18 | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $51.92 | — | $1.65 | — | $2.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.3% | +0.3% | +4.0% | +1.1% |
HUBS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). HTCR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
HTCR vs SPSC vs ORCL vs HUBS vs SAP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HTCR or SPSC or ORCL or HUBS or SAP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HubSpot, Inc.
(HUBS) is the stronger pick with 19. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -70. 5% for HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. (HTCR). HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. (HTCR) offers the better valuation at 0. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Oracle Corporation (ORCL) a "Buy" — based on 86 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HTCR or SPSC or ORCL or HUBS or SAP?
On trailing P/E, HeartCore Enterprises, Inc.
(HTCR) is the cheapest at 0. 0x versus HubSpot, Inc. at 284. 1x. On forward P/E, SPS Commerce, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: SPS Commerce, Inc. wins at 0. 83x versus Oracle Corporation's 3. 69x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HTCR or SPSC or ORCL or HUBS or SAP?
Over the past 5 years, Oracle Corporation (ORCL) delivered a total return of +151.
8%, compared to -99. 7% for HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. (HTCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ORCL returned +428. 7% versus HTCR's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HTCR or SPSC or ORCL or HUBS or SAP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SAP SE (SAP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
85β versus HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. 's 1. 78β — meaning HTCR is approximately 109% more volatile than SAP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 5% for Oracle Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HTCR or SPSC or ORCL or HUBS or SAP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HubSpot, Inc.
(HUBS) is pulling ahead at 19. 2% versus -70. 5% for HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. (HTCR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HubSpot, Inc. grew EPS 863. 0% year-over-year, compared to 17. 0% for Oracle Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, HUBS leads at 21. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HTCR or SPSC or ORCL or HUBS or SAP?
HeartCore Enterprises, Inc.
(HTCR) is the more profitable company, earning 64. 6% net margin versus 1. 5% for HubSpot, Inc. — meaning it keeps 64. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ORCL leads at 30. 8% versus -33. 2% for HTCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUBS leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HTCR or SPSC or ORCL or HUBS or SAP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 83x versus Oracle Corporation's 3. 69x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) trades at 11. 9x forward P/E versus 26. 2x for Oracle Corporation — 14. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SAP: 124. 2% to $391. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — HTCR or SPSC or ORCL or HUBS or SAP?
In this comparison, HTCR (100.
0% yield), SAP (1. 5% yield), ORCL (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. SPSC, HUBS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HTCR or SPSC or ORCL or HUBS or SAP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SAP SE (SAP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
85), 1. 5% yield, +151. 5% 10Y return). HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. (HTCR) carries a higher beta of 1. 78 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SAP: +151. 5%, HTCR: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HTCR and SPSC and ORCL and HUBS and SAP?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HTCR is a small-cap deep-value stock; SPSC is a small-cap high-growth stock; ORCL is a large-cap quality compounder stock; HUBS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SAP is a large-cap quality compounder stock. HTCR, ORCL, SAP pay a dividend while SPSC, HUBS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.