Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HUMA vs NVCR vs HOLX vs MDT vs ABT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
Medical - Devices
HUMA vs NVCR vs HOLX vs MDT vs ABT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $140M | $1.92B | $16.97B | $99.94B | $151.30B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9M | $674M | $4.13B | $35.48B | $43.84B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-37M | $-173M | $544M | $4.61B | $13.98B |
| Gross Margin | 9.9% | 75.2% | 52.8% | 61.9% | 54.0% |
| Operating Margin | -12.0% | -27.2% | 17.5% | 17.9% | 17.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 17.2x | 14.1x | 15.9x |
| Total Debt | $17M | $290M | $2.63B | $28.52B | $15.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $45M | $103M | $1.96B | $2.22B | $7.62B |
HUMA vs NVCR vs HOLX vs MDT vs ABT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Humacyte, Inc. (HUMA) | 100 | 10.6 | -89.4% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 9.7 | -90.3% |
| Hologic, Inc. (HOLX) | 100 | 103.8 | +3.8% |
| Medtronic plc (MDT) | 100 | 66.6 | -33.4% |
| Abbott Laboratories (ABT) | 100 | 79.5 | -20.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HUMA vs NVCR vs HOLX vs MDT vs ABT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HUMA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 79.5% revenue growth vs HOLX's 1.7%
NVCR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 8.3%, EPS growth 21.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.8%
HOLX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.41, Low D/E 52.0%, current ratio 3.75x
- +37.1% vs ABT's -33.2%
MDT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 3.6%
- Beta 0.47, yield 3.6%, current ratio 1.85x
- Better valuation composite
- 3.6% yield, 36-year raise streak, vs ABT's 2.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
ABT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 173.7% 10Y total return vs HOLX's 124.3%
- PEG 0.53 vs MDT's 36.00
- 31.9% margin vs HUMA's -420.2%
- Beta 0.25 vs HUMA's 3.27
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 79.5% revenue growth vs HOLX's 1.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.9% margin vs HUMA's -420.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.25 vs HUMA's 3.27 | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 36-year raise streak, vs ABT's 2.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.1% vs ABT's -33.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 175.8% ROA vs HUMA's -40.4% |
HUMA vs NVCR vs HOLX vs MDT vs ABT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
HUMA vs NVCR vs HOLX vs MDT vs ABT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MDT leads in 2 of 6 categories
NVCR leads 1 • ABT leads 1 • HUMA leads 0 • HOLX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVCR leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABT is the larger business by revenue, generating $43.8B annually — 4982.7x HUMA's $9M. ABT is the more profitable business, keeping 31.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HUMA's -4.2%. On growth, NVCR holds the edge at +12.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9M | $674M | $4.1B | $35.5B | $43.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$98M | -$165M | $974M | $9.4B | $10.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$37M | -$173M | $544M | $4.6B | $14.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$106M | -$48M | $1000M | $5.4B | $6.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +75.2% | +52.8% | +61.9% | +54.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -12.0% | -27.2% | +17.5% | +17.9% | +17.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.2% | -25.7% | +13.2% | +13.0% | +31.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.1% | -7.1% | +24.2% | +15.2% | +15.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +12.3% | +2.5% | +8.8% | +6.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +66.7% | -100.0% | -9.2% | -11.9% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MDT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.4x trailing earnings, ABT trades at a 63% valuation discount to HOLX's 30.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ABT offers better value at 0.38x vs MDT's 36.00x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $140M | $1.9B | $17.0B | $99.9B | $151.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $112M | $2.1B | $17.6B | $126.2B | $159.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.86x | -13.80x | 30.53x | 21.60x | 11.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 17.21x | 14.13x | 15.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 36.00x | 0.38x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 17.39x | 14.32x | 15.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.92x | 4.14x | 2.98x | 3.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 5.51x | 3.43x | 2.08x | 3.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 18.44x | 19.28x | 23.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ABT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABT delivers a 27.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. ABT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HOLX scores 7/9 vs HUMA's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -50.8% | +11.0% | +9.4% | +27.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -40.4% | -16.5% | +6.1% | +175.8% | +16.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -16.4% | +9.4% | +6.0% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -100.5% | -28.9% | +8.8% | +7.5% | +10.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.85x | 0.52x | 0.59x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$28M | $187M | $667M | $26.3B | $7.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $45M | $103M | $2.0B | $2.2B | $7.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17M | $290M | $2.6B | $28.5B | $15.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.47x | -96.80x | 8.00x | 9.08x | 19.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — HOLX and MDT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HOLX five years ago would be worth $11,582 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, HOLX leads with a +37.1% total return vs ABT's -33.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MDT at -1.4% vs HUMA's -39.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.8% | +28.3% | +1.9% | -18.1% | -28.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.5% | +1.1% | +37.1% | -2.8% | -33.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.3% | -75.7% | -8.5% | -4.2% | -15.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.2% | -91.3% | +15.8% | -27.7% | -17.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.8% | +30.3% | +124.3% | +26.5% | +173.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -39.9% | -37.6% | -2.9% | -1.4% | -5.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HOLX and ABT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABT is the less volatile stock with a 0.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HUMA's 3.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOLX currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs HUMA's 36.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.27x | 2.20x | 0.41x | 0.47x | 0.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.93 | $20.06 | $76.04 | $106.33 | $139.06 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.55 | $9.82 | $52.81 | $77.16 | $86.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.9% | +83.9% | +100.0% | +73.3% | +62.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.9 | 69.8 | 69.1 | 27.3 | 22.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.7M | 1.5M | 10.0M | 7.8M | 10.5M |
Analyst Outlook
MDT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HUMA as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", HOLX as "Hold", MDT as "Buy", ABT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 177.8% upside for HUMA (target: $3) vs 3.9% for HOLX (target: $79). For income investors, MDT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.57% vs ABT's 2.52%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.00 | $33.50 | $79.00 | $109.50 | $128.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 15 | 42 | 49 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +3.6% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 36 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $2.78 | $2.19 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.4% | +3.2% | +0.9% |
MDT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). NVCR leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
HUMA vs NVCR vs HOLX vs MDT vs ABT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HUMA or NVCR or HOLX or MDT or ABT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NovoCure Limited (NVCR) is the stronger pick with 8.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 7% for Hologic, Inc. (HOLX). Abbott Laboratories (ABT) offers the better valuation at 11. 4x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Humacyte, Inc. (HUMA) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HUMA or NVCR or HOLX or MDT or ABT?
On trailing P/E, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is the cheapest at 11.
4x versus Hologic, Inc. at 30. 5x. On forward P/E, Medtronic plc is actually cheaper at 14. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Abbott Laboratories wins at 0. 53x versus Medtronic plc's 36. 00x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HUMA or NVCR or HOLX or MDT or ABT?
Over the past 5 years, Hologic, Inc.
(HOLX) delivered a total return of +15. 8%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABT returned +173. 7% versus HUMA's -88. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HUMA or NVCR or HOLX or MDT or ABT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
25β versus Humacyte, Inc. 's 3. 27β — meaning HUMA is approximately 1218% more volatile than ABT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HUMA or NVCR or HOLX or MDT or ABT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NovoCure Limited (NVCR) is pulling ahead at 8.
3% versus 1. 7% for Hologic, Inc. (HOLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Abbott Laboratories grew EPS 133. 6% year-over-year, compared to -25. 0% for Hologic, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVCR leads at 6. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HUMA or NVCR or HOLX or MDT or ABT?
Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
9% net margin versus -420. 2% for Humacyte, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MDT leads at 17. 8% versus -1197. 7% for HUMA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HUMA or NVCR or HOLX or MDT or ABT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 53x versus Medtronic plc's 36. 00x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Medtronic plc (MDT) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 17. 2x for Hologic, Inc. — 3. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HUMA: 177. 8% to $3. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HUMA or NVCR or HOLX or MDT or ABT?
In this comparison, MDT (3.
6% yield), ABT (2. 5% yield) pay a dividend. HUMA, NVCR, HOLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HUMA or NVCR or HOLX or MDT or ABT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
25), 2. 5% yield, +173. 7% 10Y return). Humacyte, Inc. (HUMA) carries a higher beta of 3. 27 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABT: +173. 7%, HUMA: -88. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HUMA and NVCR and HOLX and MDT and ABT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HUMA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HOLX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MDT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; ABT is a mid-cap deep-value stock. MDT, ABT pay a dividend while HUMA, NVCR, HOLX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.