Home Improvement
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
HVT vs ETH vs PRPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management - Cryptocurrency
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
HVT vs ETH vs PRPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Home Improvement | Asset Management - Cryptocurrency | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $352M | $567M | $56M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $766M | $615M | $505M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $47M | $-35M |
| Gross Margin | 60.7% | 60.5% | 40.9% |
| Operating Margin | 2.9% | 10.1% | -6.1% |
| Forward P/E | 11.6x | 8.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $216M | $124M | $204M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $132M | $76M | $24M |
HVT vs ETH vs PRPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Haverty Furniture C… (HVT) | 100 | 74.2 | -25.8% |
| Grayscale Ethereum … (ETH) | 100 | 72.4 | -27.6% |
| Purple Innovation, … (PRPL) | 100 | 37.3 | -62.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HVT vs ETH vs PRPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HVT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.14, yield 5.8%
- 111.2% 10Y total return vs ETH's -17.2%
- Beta 1.14, yield 5.8%, current ratio 1.87x
ETH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.91, Low D/E 25.6%, current ratio 2.03x
- Better valuation composite
- 8.4% margin vs PRPL's -7.0%
PRPL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -3.9%, EPS growth 47.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.5%
- Beta 1.08 vs ETH's 2.91
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.0% revenue growth vs ETH's -4.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.4% margin vs PRPL's -7.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.08 vs ETH's 2.91 | |
| Dividends | 5.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.7% vs PRPL's -30.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs PRPL's -12.1%, ROIC 7.6% vs -15.8% |
HVT vs ETH vs PRPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HVT vs ETH vs PRPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ETH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HVT is the larger business by revenue, generating $766M annually — 1.5x PRPL's $505M. ETH is the more profitable business, keeping 8.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRPL's -7.0%. On growth, PRPL holds the edge at +35.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $766M | $615M | $505M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $46M | $70M | -$12M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | $47M | -$35M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $23M | $20M | -$15M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.7% | +60.5% | +40.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +10.1% | -6.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.6% | +8.4% | -7.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +0.0% | -3.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.1% | — | +35.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -99.9% | -28.1% | -55.6% |
Valuation Metrics
HVT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.1x trailing earnings, ETH trades at a 39% valuation discount to HVT's 18.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HVT's 9.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ETH's 9.9x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $352M | $567M | $56M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $436M | $615M | $236M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.25x | 11.09x | -1.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.58x | 8.75x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.26x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.69x | 9.92x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.46x | 0.92x | 0.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.16x | 1.19x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.66x | 9999.00x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ETH leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ETH delivers a 10.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $2 for HVT. ETH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HVT's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HVT scores 7/9 vs PRPL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.6% | +10.0% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +6.4% | -12.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.0% | +7.6% | -15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.1% | +10.5% | -15.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.70x | 0.26x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $85M | $47M | $180M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $132M | $76M | $24M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $216M | $124M | $204M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 624.08x | 721.00x | -0.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HVT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ETH five years ago would be worth $7,125 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $168 for PRPL. Over the past 12 months, ETH leads with a +32.7% total return vs PRPL's -30.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HVT at 1.2% vs PRPL's -44.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.5% | -24.3% | -28.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.1% | +32.7% | -30.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.6% | -31.8% | -82.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.3% | -28.7% | -98.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +111.2% | -17.2% | -94.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.2% | -12.0% | -44.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HVT and PRPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PRPL is the less volatile stock with a 1.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ETH's 2.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HVT currently trades 78.5% from its 52-week high vs PRPL's 40.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.14x | 2.91x | 1.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.67 | $45.78 | $1.26 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.69 | $16.50 | $0.47 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.5% | +48.7% | +40.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.4 | 57.9 | 31.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 116K | 4.7M | 318K |
Analyst Outlook
HVT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HVT as "Buy", ETH as "Hold". HVT is the only dividend payer here at 5.84% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $42.00 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 10 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.8% | +0.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.27 | $0.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
HVT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). ETH leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
HVT vs ETH vs PRPL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HVT or ETH or PRPL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc.
(HVT) is the stronger pick with 5. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 9% for Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH). Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) offers the better valuation at 11. 1x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. (HVT) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HVT or ETH or PRPL?
On trailing P/E, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) is the cheapest at 11.
1x versus Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. at 18. 3x. On forward P/E, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust is actually cheaper at 8. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HVT or ETH or PRPL?
Over the past 5 years, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) delivered a total return of -28.
7%, compared to -98. 3% for Purple Innovation, Inc. (PRPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HVT returned +111. 2% versus PRPL's -94. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HVT or ETH or PRPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Purple Innovation, Inc.
(PRPL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 08β versus Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust's 2. 91β — meaning ETH is approximately 168% more volatile than PRPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 70% for Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HVT or ETH or PRPL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc.
(HVT) is pulling ahead at 5. 0% versus -4. 9% for Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Purple Innovation, Inc. grew EPS 47. 3% year-over-year, compared to -19. 3% for Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust. Over a 3-year CAGR, PRPL leads at -6. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HVT or ETH or PRPL?
Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
4% net margin versus -11. 0% for Purple Innovation, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ETH leads at 10. 1% versus -6. 8% for PRPL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HVT leads at 60. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HVT or ETH or PRPL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) trades at 8.
7x forward P/E versus 11. 6x for Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. — 2. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — HVT or ETH or PRPL?
In this comparison, HVT (5.
8% yield) pays a dividend. ETH, PRPL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HVT or ETH or PRPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc.
(HVT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 14), 5. 8% yield, +111. 2% 10Y return). Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) carries a higher beta of 2. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HVT: +111. 2%, ETH: -17. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HVT and ETH and PRPL?
These companies operate in different sectors (HVT (Consumer Cyclical) and ETH (Financial Services) and PRPL (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HVT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ETH is a small-cap deep-value stock; PRPL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. HVT pays a dividend while ETH, PRPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.