Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HVT vs ETH vs PRPL vs LOVE vs RH

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HVT
Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc.

Home Improvement

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$353M
5Y Perf.-25.5%
ETH
Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust

Asset Management - Cryptocurrency

Financial ServicesAMEX • US
Market Cap$554M
5Y Perf.-29.3%
PRPL
Purple Innovation, Inc.

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$56M
5Y Perf.-62.7%
LOVE
The Lovesac Company

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$228M
5Y Perf.-42.9%
RH
Rh

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.50B
5Y Perf.-53.9%

HVT vs ETH vs PRPL vs LOVE vs RH — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HVT logoHVT
ETH logoETH
PRPL logoPRPL
LOVE logoLOVE
RH logoRH
IndustryHome ImprovementAsset Management - CryptocurrencyFurnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesFurnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesSpecialty Retail
Market Cap$353M$554M$56M$228M$2.50B
Revenue (TTM)$766M$615M$505M$690M$3.41B
Net Income (TTM)$5M$47M$-35M$13M$110M
Gross Margin60.7%60.5%40.9%57.7%44.5%
Operating Margin2.9%10.1%-6.1%6.3%10.6%
Forward P/E11.6x8.5x25.7x19.3x
Total Debt$216M$124M$204M$183M$3.94B
Cash & Equiv.$132M$76M$24M$84M$30M

HVT vs ETH vs PRPL vs LOVE vs RHLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HVT
ETH
PRPL
LOVE
RH
StockJul 24May 26Return
Haverty Furniture C… (HVT)10074.5-25.5%
Grayscale Ethereum … (ETH)10070.7-29.3%
Purple Innovation, … (PRPL)10037.3-62.7%
The Lovesac Company (LOVE)10057.1-42.9%
Rh (RH)10046.1-53.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HVT vs ETH vs PRPL vs LOVE vs RH

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ETH leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. PRPL and RH also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
HVT
Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc.
The Income Pick

HVT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.14, yield 5.8%
  • 109.8% 10Y total return vs ETH's -18.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.14, Low D/E 70.3%, current ratio 1.87x
  • Beta 1.14, yield 5.8%, current ratio 1.87x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
ETH
Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust
The Banking Pick

ETH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (8.5x vs 19.3x)
  • 8.4% margin vs PRPL's -7.0%
  • +28.9% vs PRPL's -37.3%
  • 6.4% ROA vs PRPL's -12.1%, ROIC 7.6% vs -15.8%
Best for: value and quality
PRPL
Purple Innovation, Inc.
The Defensive Choice

PRPL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.

  • Beta 1.08 vs ETH's 2.91
Best for: stability
LOVE
The Lovesac Company
The Consumer Cyclical Pick

Among these 5 stocks, LOVE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
RH
Rh
The Growth Play

RH is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 5.0%, EPS growth -38.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -5.4%
  • 5.0% revenue growth vs ETH's -4.9%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRH logoRH5.0% revenue growth vs ETH's -4.9%
ValueETH logoETHLower P/E (8.5x vs 19.3x)
Quality / MarginsETH logoETH8.4% margin vs PRPL's -7.0%
Stability / SafetyPRPL logoPRPLBeta 1.08 vs ETH's 2.91
DividendsHVT logoHVT5.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ETH logoETH+28.9% vs PRPL's -37.3%
Efficiency (ROA)ETH logoETH6.4% ROA vs PRPL's -12.1%, ROIC 7.6% vs -15.8%

HVT vs ETH vs PRPL vs LOVE vs RH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

HVTHaverty Furniture Companies, Inc.
FY 2025
Upholstery
33.6%$338M
Case Goods
24.5%$246M
Bedroom Furniture
11.3%$113M
Accessories and Other
10.8%$108M
Dining Room Furniture
7.8%$78M
Mattresses
6.7%$67M
Occasional
5.5%$55M
ETHGrayscale Ethereum Mini Trust
FY 2025
Upholstery Furniture
48.9%$301M
Case Goods Furniture
28.6%$176M
Accent
19.0%$117M
Manufactured Product, Other
3.5%$22M
PRPLPurple Innovation, Inc.
FY 2023
Product
100.0%$511M
LOVEThe Lovesac Company
FY 2025
Sactionals Member
91.4%$622M
Sacs Member
7.2%$49M
Other Operating Segment
1.5%$10M
RHRh
FY 2024
RH Segment
93.9%$3.0B
Waterworks
6.1%$193M

HVT vs ETH vs PRPL vs LOVE vs RH — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLETHLAGGINGLOVE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

RH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

RH is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 6.7x PRPL's $505M. ETH is the more profitable business, keeping 8.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRPL's -7.0%. On growth, PRPL holds the edge at +35.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricHVT logoHVTHaverty Furniture…ETH logoETHGrayscale Ethereu…PRPL logoPRPLPurple Innovation…LOVE logoLOVEThe Lovesac Compa…RH logoRHRh
RevenueTrailing 12 months$766M$615M$505M$690M$3.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$46M$70M-$12M$58M$465M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$5M$47M-$35M$13M$110M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$23M$20M-$15M-$11M$128M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+60.7%+60.5%+40.9%+57.7%+44.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+2.9%+10.1%-6.1%+6.3%+10.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+0.6%+8.4%-7.0%+1.9%+3.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.0%+0.0%-3.0%-1.5%+3.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.1%+35.1%+2.5%+8.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-99.9%-28.1%-55.6%-18.4%+10.2%
RH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ETH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 10.8x trailing earnings, ETH trades at a 71% valuation discount to RH's 36.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ETH's 9.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RH's 14.2x.

MetricHVT logoHVTHaverty Furniture…ETH logoETHGrayscale Ethereu…PRPL logoPRPLPurple Innovation…LOVE logoLOVEThe Lovesac Compa…RH logoRHRh
Market CapShares × price$353M$554M$56M$228M$2.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$438M$602M$236M$327M$6.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS18.34x10.84x-1.07x22.64x36.94x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.64x8.55x25.68x19.34x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.25x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.73x9.71x11.54x14.16x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.47x0.90x0.12x0.34x0.79x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.16x1.16x1.21x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.71x9999.00x13.06x
ETH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ETH leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

RH delivers a 32.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $2 for HVT. ETH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LOVE's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HVT scores 7/9 vs PRPL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricHVT logoHVTHaverty Furniture…ETH logoETHGrayscale Ethereu…PRPL logoPRPLPurple Innovation…LOVE logoLOVEThe Lovesac Compa…RH logoRHRh
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+1.6%+10.0%+6.5%+32.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.7%+6.4%-12.1%+2.6%+2.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.0%+7.6%-15.8%+3.3%+6.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+4.1%+10.5%-15.8%+3.6%+9.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–974455
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.70x0.26x0.85x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$85M$47M$180M$99M$3.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$132M$76M$24M$84M$30M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$216M$124M$204M$183M$3.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense624.08x721.00x-0.32x1.12x
ETH leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — HVT and ETH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ETH five years ago would be worth $6,969 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $169 for PRPL. Over the past 12 months, ETH leads with a +28.9% total return vs PRPL's -37.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HVT at 1.3% vs PRPL's -44.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHVT logoHVTHaverty Furniture…ETH logoETHGrayscale Ethereu…PRPL logoPRPLPurple Innovation…LOVE logoLOVEThe Lovesac Compa…RH logoRHRh
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-6.1%-26.1%-28.6%+8.2%-30.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+22.9%+28.9%-37.3%-23.5%-29.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+4.0%-33.4%-82.8%-40.1%-48.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-32.0%-30.3%-98.3%-78.4%-80.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+109.8%-18.8%-94.8%-34.9%+257.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+1.3%-12.7%-44.4%-15.7%-19.6%
Evenly matched — HVT and ETH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — HVT and PRPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PRPL is the less volatile stock with a 1.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ETH's 2.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HVT currently trades 78.9% from its 52-week high vs PRPL's 40.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricHVT logoHVTHaverty Furniture…ETH logoETHGrayscale Ethereu…PRPL logoPRPLPurple Innovation…LOVE logoLOVEThe Lovesac Compa…RH logoRHRh
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.14x2.91x1.08x1.33x2.36x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$27.67$45.78$1.26$21.90$257.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$18.70$16.85$0.47$10.33$106.31
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+78.9%+47.6%+40.8%+71.3%+52.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.955.836.753.748.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded114K4.6M322K299K1.2M
Evenly matched — HVT and PRPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

HVT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: HVT as "Buy", ETH as "Hold", LOVE as "Buy", RH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 92.5% upside for HVT (target: $42) vs 44.0% for LOVE (target: $23). HVT is the only dividend payer here at 5.81% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricHVT logoHVTHaverty Furniture…ETH logoETHGrayscale Ethereu…PRPL logoPRPLPurple Innovation…LOVE logoLOVEThe Lovesac Compa…RH logoRHRh
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$42.00$22.50$208.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts6101137
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+5.8%+0.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises100
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.27$0.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.4%0.0%0.0%+8.7%+0.5%
HVT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ETH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). RH leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallGrayscale Ethereum Mini Tru… (ETH)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HVT vs ETH vs PRPL vs LOVE vs RH: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HVT or ETH or PRPL or LOVE or RH a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Rh (RH) is the stronger pick with 5.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 9% for Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH). Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) offers the better valuation at 10. 8x trailing P/E (8. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. (HVT) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — HVT or ETH or PRPL or LOVE or RH?

On trailing P/E, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) is the cheapest at 10.

8x versus Rh at 36. 9x. On forward P/E, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust is actually cheaper at 8. 5x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — HVT or ETH or PRPL or LOVE or RH?

Over the past 5 years, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) delivered a total return of -30.

3%, compared to -98. 3% for Purple Innovation, Inc. (PRPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RH returned +257. 5% versus PRPL's -94. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — HVT or ETH or PRPL or LOVE or RH?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Purple Innovation, Inc.

(PRPL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 08β versus Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust's 2. 91β — meaning ETH is approximately 168% more volatile than PRPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 85% for The Lovesac Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — HVT or ETH or PRPL or LOVE or RH?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rh (RH) is pulling ahead at 5.

0% versus -4. 9% for Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Purple Innovation, Inc. grew EPS 47. 3% year-over-year, compared to -52. 4% for The Lovesac Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, LOVE leads at 11. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — HVT or ETH or PRPL or LOVE or RH?

Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) is the more profitable company, earning 8.

4% net margin versus -11. 0% for Purple Innovation, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RH leads at 10. 1% versus -6. 8% for PRPL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HVT leads at 60. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is HVT or ETH or PRPL or LOVE or RH more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) trades at 8.

5x forward P/E versus 25. 7x for The Lovesac Company — 17. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HVT: 92. 5% to $42. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — HVT or ETH or PRPL or LOVE or RH?

In this comparison, HVT (5.

8% yield) pays a dividend. ETH, PRPL, LOVE, RH do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is HVT or ETH or PRPL or LOVE or RH better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc.

(HVT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 14), 5. 8% yield, +109. 8% 10Y return). Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) carries a higher beta of 2. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HVT: +109. 8%, ETH: -18. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between HVT and ETH and PRPL and LOVE and RH?

These companies operate in different sectors (HVT (Consumer Cyclical) and ETH (Financial Services) and PRPL (Consumer Cyclical) and LOVE (Consumer Cyclical) and RH (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: HVT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ETH is a small-cap deep-value stock; PRPL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LOVE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RH is a small-cap quality compounder stock. HVT pays a dividend while ETH, PRPL, LOVE, RH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

HVT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 36%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.3%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ETH

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PRPL

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 17%
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LOVE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 34%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RH

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 26%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform HVT and ETH and PRPL and LOVE and RH on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(HVT: 4.1% · ETH: -4.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(HVT: 18.3x · ETH: 10.8x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.