Home Improvement
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HVT vs ETH vs PRPL vs LOVE vs RH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management - Cryptocurrency
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Specialty Retail
HVT vs ETH vs PRPL vs LOVE vs RH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Home Improvement | Asset Management - Cryptocurrency | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $353M | $554M | $56M | $228M | $2.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $766M | $615M | $505M | $690M | $3.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $47M | $-35M | $13M | $110M |
| Gross Margin | 60.7% | 60.5% | 40.9% | 57.7% | 44.5% |
| Operating Margin | 2.9% | 10.1% | -6.1% | 6.3% | 10.6% |
| Forward P/E | 11.6x | 8.5x | — | 25.7x | 19.3x |
| Total Debt | $216M | $124M | $204M | $183M | $3.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $132M | $76M | $24M | $84M | $30M |
HVT vs ETH vs PRPL vs LOVE vs RH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Haverty Furniture C… (HVT) | 100 | 74.5 | -25.5% |
| Grayscale Ethereum … (ETH) | 100 | 70.7 | -29.3% |
| Purple Innovation, … (PRPL) | 100 | 37.3 | -62.7% |
| The Lovesac Company (LOVE) | 100 | 57.1 | -42.9% |
| Rh (RH) | 100 | 46.1 | -53.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HVT vs ETH vs PRPL vs LOVE vs RH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HVT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.14, yield 5.8%
- 109.8% 10Y total return vs ETH's -18.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.14, Low D/E 70.3%, current ratio 1.87x
- Beta 1.14, yield 5.8%, current ratio 1.87x
ETH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (8.5x vs 19.3x)
- 8.4% margin vs PRPL's -7.0%
- +28.9% vs PRPL's -37.3%
- 6.4% ROA vs PRPL's -12.1%, ROIC 7.6% vs -15.8%
PRPL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 1.08 vs ETH's 2.91
Among these 5 stocks, LOVE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
RH is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.0%, EPS growth -38.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -5.4%
- 5.0% revenue growth vs ETH's -4.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.0% revenue growth vs ETH's -4.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.5x vs 19.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.4% margin vs PRPL's -7.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.08 vs ETH's 2.91 | |
| Dividends | 5.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.9% vs PRPL's -37.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs PRPL's -12.1%, ROIC 7.6% vs -15.8% |
HVT vs ETH vs PRPL vs LOVE vs RH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HVT vs ETH vs PRPL vs LOVE vs RH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ETH leads in 2 of 6 categories
RH leads 1 • HVT leads 1 • PRPL leads 0 • LOVE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RH is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 6.7x PRPL's $505M. ETH is the more profitable business, keeping 8.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRPL's -7.0%. On growth, PRPL holds the edge at +35.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $766M | $615M | $505M | $690M | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $46M | $70M | -$12M | $58M | $465M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | $47M | -$35M | $13M | $110M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $23M | $20M | -$15M | -$11M | $128M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.7% | +60.5% | +40.9% | +57.7% | +44.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +10.1% | -6.1% | +6.3% | +10.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.6% | +8.4% | -7.0% | +1.9% | +3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +0.0% | -3.0% | -1.5% | +3.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.1% | — | +35.1% | +2.5% | +8.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -99.9% | -28.1% | -55.6% | -18.4% | +10.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ETH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.8x trailing earnings, ETH trades at a 71% valuation discount to RH's 36.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ETH's 9.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RH's 14.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $353M | $554M | $56M | $228M | $2.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $438M | $602M | $236M | $327M | $6.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.34x | 10.84x | -1.07x | 22.64x | 36.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.64x | 8.55x | — | 25.68x | 19.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.25x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.73x | 9.71x | — | 11.54x | 14.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.47x | 0.90x | 0.12x | 0.34x | 0.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.16x | 1.16x | — | 1.21x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.71x | 9999.00x | — | 13.06x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ETH leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RH delivers a 32.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $2 for HVT. ETH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LOVE's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HVT scores 7/9 vs PRPL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.6% | +10.0% | — | +6.5% | +32.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +6.4% | -12.1% | +2.6% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.0% | +7.6% | -15.8% | +3.3% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.1% | +10.5% | -15.8% | +3.6% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.70x | 0.26x | — | 0.85x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $85M | $47M | $180M | $99M | $3.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $132M | $76M | $24M | $84M | $30M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $216M | $124M | $204M | $183M | $3.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 624.08x | 721.00x | -0.32x | — | 1.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — HVT and ETH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ETH five years ago would be worth $6,969 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $169 for PRPL. Over the past 12 months, ETH leads with a +28.9% total return vs PRPL's -37.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HVT at 1.3% vs PRPL's -44.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.1% | -26.1% | -28.6% | +8.2% | -30.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.9% | +28.9% | -37.3% | -23.5% | -29.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.0% | -33.4% | -82.8% | -40.1% | -48.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.0% | -30.3% | -98.3% | -78.4% | -80.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +109.8% | -18.8% | -94.8% | -34.9% | +257.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.3% | -12.7% | -44.4% | -15.7% | -19.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HVT and PRPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PRPL is the less volatile stock with a 1.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ETH's 2.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HVT currently trades 78.9% from its 52-week high vs PRPL's 40.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.14x | 2.91x | 1.08x | 1.33x | 2.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.67 | $45.78 | $1.26 | $21.90 | $257.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.70 | $16.85 | $0.47 | $10.33 | $106.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.9% | +47.6% | +40.8% | +71.3% | +52.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.9 | 55.8 | 36.7 | 53.7 | 48.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 114K | 4.6M | 322K | 299K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
HVT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HVT as "Buy", ETH as "Hold", LOVE as "Buy", RH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 92.5% upside for HVT (target: $42) vs 44.0% for LOVE (target: $23). HVT is the only dividend payer here at 5.81% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $42.00 | — | — | $22.50 | $208.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 10 | — | 11 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.8% | +0.0% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.27 | $0.00 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +8.7% | +0.5% |
ETH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). RH leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
HVT vs ETH vs PRPL vs LOVE vs RH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HVT or ETH or PRPL or LOVE or RH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Rh (RH) is the stronger pick with 5.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 9% for Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH). Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) offers the better valuation at 10. 8x trailing P/E (8. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. (HVT) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HVT or ETH or PRPL or LOVE or RH?
On trailing P/E, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) is the cheapest at 10.
8x versus Rh at 36. 9x. On forward P/E, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust is actually cheaper at 8. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HVT or ETH or PRPL or LOVE or RH?
Over the past 5 years, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) delivered a total return of -30.
3%, compared to -98. 3% for Purple Innovation, Inc. (PRPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RH returned +257. 5% versus PRPL's -94. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HVT or ETH or PRPL or LOVE or RH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Purple Innovation, Inc.
(PRPL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 08β versus Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust's 2. 91β — meaning ETH is approximately 168% more volatile than PRPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 85% for The Lovesac Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HVT or ETH or PRPL or LOVE or RH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rh (RH) is pulling ahead at 5.
0% versus -4. 9% for Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Purple Innovation, Inc. grew EPS 47. 3% year-over-year, compared to -52. 4% for The Lovesac Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, LOVE leads at 11. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HVT or ETH or PRPL or LOVE or RH?
Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
4% net margin versus -11. 0% for Purple Innovation, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RH leads at 10. 1% versus -6. 8% for PRPL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HVT leads at 60. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HVT or ETH or PRPL or LOVE or RH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) trades at 8.
5x forward P/E versus 25. 7x for The Lovesac Company — 17. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HVT: 92. 5% to $42. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HVT or ETH or PRPL or LOVE or RH?
In this comparison, HVT (5.
8% yield) pays a dividend. ETH, PRPL, LOVE, RH do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HVT or ETH or PRPL or LOVE or RH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc.
(HVT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 14), 5. 8% yield, +109. 8% 10Y return). Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) carries a higher beta of 2. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HVT: +109. 8%, ETH: -18. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HVT and ETH and PRPL and LOVE and RH?
These companies operate in different sectors (HVT (Consumer Cyclical) and ETH (Financial Services) and PRPL (Consumer Cyclical) and LOVE (Consumer Cyclical) and RH (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HVT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ETH is a small-cap deep-value stock; PRPL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LOVE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RH is a small-cap quality compounder stock. HVT pays a dividend while ETH, PRPL, LOVE, RH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.