Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
HWBK logo
HWBK
CZWI logo
CZWI
BFST logo
BFST
MOFG logo
MOFG
QCRH logo
QCRH
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HWBK vs CZWI vs BFST vs MOFG vs QCRH vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HWBK
Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$260M
5Y Perf.+115.4%
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$207M
5Y Perf.+212.8%
BFST
Business First Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$956M
5Y Perf.+90.5%
MOFG
MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.02B
5Y Perf.+131.6%
QCRH
QCR Holdings, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.61B
5Y Perf.+208.9%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%

HWBK vs CZWI vs BFST vs MOFG vs QCRH vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HWBK logoHWBK
CZWI logoCZWI
BFST logoBFST
MOFG logoMOFG
QCRH logoQCRH
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$260M$207M$956M$1.02B$1.61B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$112M$90M$512M$351M$597M$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$24M$14M$88M$58M$127M$57.05B
Gross Margin71.3%54.7%60.9%63.2%57.7%60.0%
Operating Margin26.0%7.0%22.2%21.3%22.8%25.9%
Forward P/E11.0x11.8x9.8x13.8x11.8x14.4x
Total Debt$155M$52M$551M$117M$618M$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$105M$119M$411M$205M$76M$343.34B

HWBK vs CZWI vs BFST vs MOFG vs QCRH vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HWBK
CZWI
BFST
MOFG
QCRH
JPM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Hawthorn Bancshares… (HWBK)100215.4+115.4%
Citizens Community … (CZWI)100312.8+212.8%
Business First Banc… (BFST)100190.5+90.5%
MidWestOne Financia… (MOFG)100231.6+131.6%
QCR Holdings, Inc. (QCRH)100308.9+208.9%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HWBK vs CZWI vs BFST vs MOFG vs QCRH vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HWBK and BFST are tied at the top with 2 categories each (6-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Business First Bancshares, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. JPM and MOFG also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
HWBK
Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

HWBK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 2.1%
  • Beta 0.35, yield 2.1%, current ratio 0.11x
  • NIM 3.5% vs JPM's 2.2%
  • Beta 0.35 vs MOFG's 1.34
Best for: income & stability and defensive
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
BFST
Business First Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BFST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 11.8%, EPS growth 23.0%
  • 11.8% NII/revenue growth vs MOFG's -23.1%
  • Lower P/E (9.8x vs 14.4x)
Best for: growth exposure
MOFG
MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

MOFG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +71.2% vs JPM's +21.8%
Best for: momentum
QCRH
QCR Holdings, Inc.
The Banking Pick

QCRH is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.81 vs CZWI's 2.32
Best for: valuation efficiency
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs HWBK's 301.1%
  • Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs MOFG's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
  • Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs MOFG's 0.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBFST logoBFST11.8% NII/revenue growth vs MOFG's -23.1%
ValueBFST logoBFSTLower P/E (9.8x vs 14.4x)
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPMEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs MOFG's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyHWBK logoHWBKBeta 0.35 vs MOFG's 1.34
DividendsHWBK logoHWBK2.1% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%
Momentum (1Y)MOFG logoMOFG+71.2% vs JPM's +21.8%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPMEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs MOFG's 0.7%

HWBK vs CZWI vs BFST vs MOFG vs QCRH vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

HWBKHawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking
39.9%$4M
Service
37.5%$4M
Fiduciary and Trust
22.5%$2M
CZWICitizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$99M
BFSTBusiness First Bancshares, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

MOFGMidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.
FY 2024
Reportable Segment
100.0%$69M
QCRHQCR Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Fiduciary and Trust
38.2%$14M
Deposit Account
23.1%$9M
Debit Card
17.1%$6M
Investment Advisory, Management and Administrative Service
14.6%$6M
Correspondent Clearing
7.1%$3M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

HWBK vs CZWI vs BFST vs MOFG vs QCRH vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHWBKLAGGINGJPM

Who Leads Where

HWBK leads in 2 of 6 categories

BFST leads 1 • CZWI leads 0 • MOFG leads 0 • QCRH leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • 3 tied

Explore the data ↓
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
0leads
QCRHQCR Holdings, Inc.
0leads
MOFGMidWestOne Financial …
0leads
CZWICitizens Community Ba…
0leads
BFSTBusiness First Bancsh…
1leads
HWBKHawthorn Bancshares, …
2leads
6 Total Categories

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — HWBK and QCRH each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 3112.4x CZWI's $90M. QCRH is the more profitable business, keeping 21.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZWI's 16.0%.

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…BFST logoBFSTBusiness First Ba…MOFG logoMOFGMidWestOne Financ…QCRH logoQCRHQCR Holdings, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$112M$90M$512M$351M$597M$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$31M$9M$119M$74M$145M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$24M$14M$88M$58M$127M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$23M$11M$88M$79M$354M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+71.3%+54.7%+60.9%+63.2%+57.7%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+26.0%+7.0%+22.2%+21.3%+22.8%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+21.2%+16.0%+17.2%+16.7%+21.3%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+20.4%+12.4%+17.1%+22.5%+59.3%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+36.4%+63.0%+39.2%+113.6%+20.3%+16.0%
Evenly matched — HWBK and QCRH each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BFST leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.5x trailing earnings, BFST trades at a 34% valuation discount to JPM's 16.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), QCRH offers better value at 0.88x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…BFST logoBFSTBusiness First Ba…MOFG logoMOFGMidWestOne Financ…QCRH logoQCRHQCR Holdings, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$260M$207M$956M$1.0B$1.6B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$310M$140M$1.1B$929M$2.2B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS10.99x14.70x10.52x-13.93x12.81x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.79x9.78x13.77x11.80x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.93x2.90x0.94x0.88x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.89x15.69x9.20x15.85x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.32x2.29x1.87x4.94x2.70x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.51x1.11x0.97x1.50x1.45x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.37x19.90x10.38x16.74x4.55x8.88x
BFST leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HWBK leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. MOFG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BFST scores 7/9 vs MOFG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…BFST logoBFSTBusiness First Ba…MOFG logoMOFGMidWestOne Financ…QCRH logoQCRHQCR Holdings, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+14.7%+7.8%+10.2%+10.0%+11.9%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.3%+0.8%+1.1%+0.9%+1.4%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.1%+2.0%+6.2%-9.4%+6.2%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.2%+0.6%+8.9%-9.5%+2.4%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9667475
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.89x0.28x0.61x0.21x0.56x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$50M-$67M$140M-$88M$541M$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$105M$119M$411M$205M$76M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$155M$52M$551M$117M$618M$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.92x0.16x0.59x0.67x0.58x0.74x
HWBK leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — CZWI and MOFG and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,865 for BFST. Over the past 12 months, MOFG leads with a +71.2% total return vs JPM's +21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs BFST's 25.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…BFST logoBFSTBusiness First Ba…MOFG logoMOFGMidWestOne Financ…QCRH logoQCRHQCR Holdings, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+12.0%+24.3%+14.1%+30.2%+17.4%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+35.8%+52.1%+23.9%+71.2%+45.1%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+123.4%+153.7%+97.0%+138.2%+122.1%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+95.3%+69.0%+38.7%+79.8%+107.4%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+301.1%+149.0%+31.2%+96.2%+254.2%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+30.7%+36.4%+25.4%+33.6%+30.5%+33.6%
Evenly matched — CZWI and MOFG and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

HWBK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

HWBK is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MOFG's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HWBK currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs CZWI's 94.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…BFST logoBFSTBusiness First Ba…MOFG logoMOFGMidWestOne Financ…QCRH logoQCRHQCR Holdings, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.35x0.50x0.79x1.34x0.83x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$37.98$22.62$30.32$49.69$97.25$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$27.07$12.83$22.52$26.52$63.68$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.3%+94.9%+96.4%+99.2%+99.1%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10057.451.264.274.965.759.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded8K41K175K095K7.0M
HWBK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — HWBK and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CZWI as "Buy", BFST as "Buy", MOFG as "Buy", QCRH as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.6% upside for BFST (target: $32) vs -36.6% for MOFG (target: $31). For income investors, HWBK offers the higher dividend yield at 2.06% vs QCRH's 0.25%.

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…BFST logoBFSTBusiness First Ba…MOFG logoMOFGMidWestOne Financ…QCRH logoQCRHQCR Holdings, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$32.33$31.25$103.00$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts248861
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.1%+1.7%+1.9%+2.0%+0.3%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises14670015
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.78$0.37$0.57$0.97$0.24$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.1%+3.0%+0.4%+0.0%+1.3%+3.9%
Evenly matched — HWBK and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

HWBK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). BFST leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallHawthorn Bancshares, Inc. (HWBK)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HWBK vs CZWI vs BFST vs MOFG vs QCRH vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HWBK or CZWI or BFST or MOFG or QCRH or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Business First Bancshares, Inc.

(BFST) is the stronger pick with 11. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). Business First Bancshares, Inc. (BFST) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — HWBK or CZWI or BFST or MOFG or QCRH or JPM?

On trailing P/E, Business First Bancshares, Inc.

(BFST) is the cheapest at 10. 5x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 16. 0x. On forward P/E, Business First Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: QCR Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 81x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — HWBK or CZWI or BFST or MOFG or QCRH or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +38. 7% for Business First Bancshares, Inc. (BFST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus BFST's +31. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — HWBK or CZWI or BFST or MOFG or QCRH or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.

(HWBK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning MOFG is approximately 283% more volatile than HWBK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — HWBK or CZWI or BFST or MOFG or QCRH or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Business First Bancshares, Inc.

(BFST) is pulling ahead at 11. 8% versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 31. 4% year-over-year, compared to -366. 2% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — HWBK or CZWI or BFST or MOFG or QCRH or JPM?

QCR Holdings, Inc.

(QCRH) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 3% net margin versus -29. 3% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HWBK leads at 26. 0% versus -40. 8% for MOFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HWBK leads at 71. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is HWBK or CZWI or BFST or MOFG or QCRH or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, QCR Holdings, Inc. (QCRH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Business First Bancshares, Inc. (BFST) trades at 9. 8x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 4. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BFST: 10. 6% to $32. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — HWBK or CZWI or BFST or MOFG or QCRH or JPM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. (HWBK) offers the highest yield at 2. 1%, versus 0. 3% for QCR Holdings, Inc. (QCRH).

09

Is HWBK or CZWI or BFST or MOFG or QCRH or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.

(HWBK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), 2. 1% yield, +301. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HWBK: +301. 1%, MOFG: +96. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between HWBK and CZWI and BFST and MOFG and QCRH and JPM?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: HWBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; BFST is a small-cap deep-value stock; MOFG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; QCRH is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. HWBK, CZWI, BFST, MOFG, JPM pay a dividend while QCRH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.