Gold
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HYMC vs CDE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gold
HYMC vs CDE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Gold |
| Market Cap | $3.63B | $12.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $2.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-77M | $799M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 39.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.4x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $365M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $182M | $554M |
HYMC vs CDE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hycroft Mining Hold… (HYMC) | 100 | 31.4 | -68.6% |
| Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) | 100 | 325.9 | +225.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HYMC vs CDE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HYMC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.21
- Lower volatility, beta 1.21, current ratio 23.86x
- Beta 1.21, current ratio 23.86x
CDE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 96.4%, EPS growth 5.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.1%
- 137.2% 10Y total return vs HYMC's -58.5%
- 96.4% revenue growth vs HYMC's -51.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 96.4% revenue growth vs HYMC's -51.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.1% margin vs HYMC's -2.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.21 vs CDE's 1.81 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +10.5% vs CDE's +223.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.2% ROA vs HYMC's -33.4%, ROIC 23.5% vs -90.1% |
HYMC vs CDE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HYMC vs CDE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CDE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CDE and HYMC operate at a comparable scale, with $2.6B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $2.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$83M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$77M | $799M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$105M | $915M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +35.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +39.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +31.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +35.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +137.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.9% | +4.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HYMC and CDE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.6B | $12.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.5B | $11.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -42.30x | 20.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.40x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 5.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.05x | 3.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 18.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CDE leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CDE delivers a 15.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-66 for HYMC. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CDE scores 6/9 vs HYMC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -65.7% | +15.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -33.4% | +11.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -90.1% | +23.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -22.8% | +23.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$182M | -$188M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $182M | $554M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $365M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.35x | 47.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HYMC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CDE five years ago would be worth $20,303 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,143 for HYMC. Over the past 12 months, HYMC leads with a +1052.5% total return vs CDE's +223.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HYMC at 112.9% vs CDE's 74.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +63.0% | +6.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1052.5% | +223.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +865.0% | +432.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.4% | +103.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.5% | +137.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +112.9% | +74.6% |
Risk & Volatility
HYMC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HYMC is the less volatile stock with a 1.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CDE's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 1.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $58.73 | $27.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.71 | $5.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.7% | +67.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.9 | 39.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.1M | 21.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HYMC as "Hold" and CDE as "Buy".
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
CDE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HYMC leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
HYMC vs CDE: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HYMC or CDE a better buy right now?
Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) offers the better valuation at 20. 8x trailing P/E (9. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HYMC or CDE?
Over the past 5 years, Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) delivered a total return of +103. 0%, compared to +1. 4% for Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CDE returned +137. 2% versus HYMC's -58. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HYMC or CDE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
21β versus Coeur Mining, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning CDE is approximately 50% more volatile than HYMC relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — HYMC or CDE?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Coeur Mining, Inc.
grew EPS 500. 0% year-over-year, compared to 64. 3% for Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — HYMC or CDE?
Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 3% net margin versus 0. 0% for Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation — meaning it keeps 28. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CDE leads at 36. 3% versus 0. 0% for HYMC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CDE leads at 39. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — HYMC or CDE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is HYMC or CDE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
21)). Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HYMC: -58. 5%, CDE: +137. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between HYMC and CDE?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HYMC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CDE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.