Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HZO vs MPX vs BC vs ONEW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Recreational Vehicles
Auto - Recreational Vehicles
Auto - Recreational Vehicles
HZO vs MPX vs BC vs ONEW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Auto - Recreational Vehicles | Auto - Recreational Vehicles | Auto - Recreational Vehicles |
| Market Cap | $724M | $298M | $5.26B | $198M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.24B | $244M | $5.52B | $1.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-64M | $11M | $-137M | $-110M |
| Gross Margin | 32.7% | 19.1% | 18.0% | 22.5% |
| Operating Margin | -0.6% | 5.2% | 5.2% | 3.4% |
| Forward P/E | 45.0x | 16.9x | 19.0x | 20.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.25B | $0.00 | $2.43B | $964M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $170M | $44M | $275M | $52M |
HZO vs MPX vs BC vs ONEW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) | 100 | 172.7 | +72.7% |
| Marine Products Cor… (MPX) | 100 | 75.2 | -24.8% |
| Brunswick Corporati… (BC) | 100 | 146.8 | +46.8% |
| OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW) | 100 | 80.9 | -19.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HZO vs MPX vs BC vs ONEW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HZO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MPX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.00, yield 6.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, current ratio 5.37x
- Beta 1.00, yield 6.6%, current ratio 5.37x
- Lower P/E (16.9x vs 19.0x)
BC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 96.4% 10Y total return vs HZO's 78.6%
- +79.7% vs ONEW's -1.3%
ONEW is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.6%, EPS growth -17.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.4%
- 5.6% revenue growth vs HZO's -5.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.6% revenue growth vs HZO's -5.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.9x vs 19.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.6% margin vs ONEW's -5.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.00 vs HZO's 2.09 | |
| Dividends | 6.6% yield, vs BC's 2.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +79.7% vs ONEW's -1.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.6% ROA vs ONEW's -7.3%, ROIC 13.3% vs 3.6% |
HZO vs MPX vs BC vs ONEW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HZO vs MPX vs BC vs ONEW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MPX leads in 2 of 6 categories
ONEW leads 1 • HZO leads 0 • BC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BC is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.5B annually — 22.6x MPX's $244M. MPX is the more profitable business, keeping 4.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ONEW's -5.9%. On growth, MPX holds the edge at +35.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.2B | $244M | $5.5B | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11M | $16M | $511M | $87M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$64M | $11M | -$137M | -$110M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $169M | $15M | $341M | $41M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.7% | +19.1% | +18.0% | +22.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | +5.2% | +5.2% | +3.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | +4.6% | -2.5% | -5.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +6.1% | +6.2% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.5% | +35.0% | +12.8% | +1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -185.7% | -43.7% | +6.7% | +42.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ONEW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, HZO's 11.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BC's 29.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $724M | $298M | $5.3B | $198M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $255M | $7.4B | $1.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -22.98x | 25.64x | -38.82x | -1.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 44.98x | 16.92x | 18.98x | 20.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.81x | 14.83x | 29.31x | 13.26x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.31x | 1.22x | 0.98x | 0.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.76x | 2.37x | 3.26x | 0.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 60.62x | 19.97x | 13.27x | 2.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MPX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MPX delivers a 8.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-33 for ONEW. HZO carries lower financial leverage with a 1.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ONEW's 3.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HZO scores 5/9 vs ONEW's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.7% | +8.9% | -5.1% | -33.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.6% | +6.6% | -2.5% | -7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.8% | +13.3% | -0.8% | +3.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.8% | +10.1% | -1.0% | +7.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.31x | — | 1.49x | 3.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | -$44M | $2.2B | $912M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $170M | $44M | $275M | $52M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $0 | $2.4B | $964M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.71x | — | 4.34x | -1.63x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — HZO and BC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BC five years ago would be worth $7,649 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,568 for ONEW. Over the past 12 months, BC leads with a +79.7% total return vs ONEW's -1.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HZO at 4.6% vs ONEW's -24.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +36.5% | -1.9% | +7.0% | +10.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +56.7% | +8.3% | +79.7% | -1.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.4% | -25.2% | +3.8% | -57.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.9% | -29.3% | -23.5% | -74.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +78.6% | +67.5% | +96.4% | -9.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.6% | -9.2% | +1.2% | -24.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HZO and MPX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MPX is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HZO's 2.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HZO currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs ONEW's 66.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.09x | 1.00x | 1.69x | 1.98x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.15 | $10.08 | $90.23 | $17.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.52 | $6.83 | $45.52 | $8.12 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.1% | +83.9% | +89.5% | +66.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.2 | 62.3 | 57.6 | 59.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 344K | 35K | 886K | 147K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MPX and BC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HZO as "Buy", MPX as "Hold", BC as "Buy", ONEW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 17.3% upside for ONEW (target: $14) vs -0.6% for HZO (target: $33). For income investors, MPX offers the higher dividend yield at 6.62% vs ONEW's 0.15%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $32.67 | — | $88.78 | $14.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 4 | 31 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +6.6% | +2.1% | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 13 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.56 | $1.71 | $0.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.8% | +0.4% | +1.5% | 0.0% |
MPX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ONEW leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
HZO vs MPX vs BC vs ONEW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HZO or MPX or BC or ONEW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, OneWater Marine Inc.
(ONEW) is the stronger pick with 5. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 0% for MarineMax, Inc. (HZO). Marine Products Corporation (MPX) offers the better valuation at 25. 6x trailing P/E (16. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HZO or MPX or BC or ONEW?
On forward P/E, Marine Products Corporation is actually cheaper at 16.
9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HZO or MPX or BC or ONEW?
Over the past 5 years, Brunswick Corporation (BC) delivered a total return of -23.
5%, compared to -74. 3% for OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BC returned +96. 4% versus ONEW's -9. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HZO or MPX or BC or ONEW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Marine Products Corporation (MPX) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
00β versus MarineMax, Inc. 's 2. 09β — meaning HZO is approximately 110% more volatile than MPX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 131% versus 3% for OneWater Marine Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HZO or MPX or BC or ONEW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), OneWater Marine Inc.
(ONEW) is pulling ahead at 5. 6% versus -5. 0% for MarineMax, Inc. (HZO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Marine Products Corporation grew EPS -34. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1751. 3% for OneWater Marine Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ONEW leads at 2. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HZO or MPX or BC or ONEW?
Marine Products Corporation (MPX) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
7% net margin versus -6. 1% for OneWater Marine Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPX leads at 5. 7% versus -0. 7% for BC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HZO leads at 32. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HZO or MPX or BC or ONEW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Marine Products Corporation (MPX) trades at 16.
9x forward P/E versus 45. 0x for MarineMax, Inc. — 28. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ONEW: 17. 3% to $14. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HZO or MPX or BC or ONEW?
In this comparison, MPX (6.
6% yield), BC (2. 1% yield), ONEW (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. HZO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HZO or MPX or BC or ONEW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Marine Products Corporation (MPX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
00), 6. 6% yield). OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW) carries a higher beta of 1. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MPX: +67. 5%, ONEW: -9. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HZO and MPX and BC and ONEW?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HZO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MPX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ONEW is a small-cap quality compounder stock. MPX, BC pay a dividend while HZO, ONEW do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.