Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

IAC vs CARS vs CARG vs ANGI vs YELP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
IAC
IAC InterActive Corp.

Internet Content & Information

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.21B
5Y Perf.-10.7%
CARS
Cars.com Inc.

Auto - Dealerships

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$704M
5Y Perf.+100.0%
CARG
CarGurus, Inc.

Auto - Dealerships

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.77B
5Y Perf.+46.9%
ANGI
Angi Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$210M
5Y Perf.-95.2%
YELP
Yelp Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.69B
5Y Perf.+31.0%

IAC vs CARS vs CARG vs ANGI vs YELP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
IAC logoIAC
CARS logoCARS
CARG logoCARG
ANGI logoANGI
YELP logoYELP
IndustryInternet Content & InformationAuto - DealershipsAuto - DealershipsInternet Content & InformationInternet Content & Information
Market Cap$3.21B$704M$3.77B$210M$1.69B
Revenue (TTM)$2.25B$724M$957M$1.02B$1.47B
Net Income (TTM)$41M$27M$149M$20M$139M
Gross Margin64.6%82.9%89.9%91.1%90.0%
Operating Margin1.5%9.7%19.7%4.8%12.4%
Forward P/E109.7x5.8x15.1x6.1x13.7x
Total Debt$1.43B$468M$191M$498M$42M
Cash & Equiv.$960M$56M$191M$304M$216M

IAC vs CARS vs CARG vs ANGI vs YELPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

IAC
CARS
CARG
ANGI
YELP
StockMay 20May 26Return
IAC InterActive Cor… (IAC)10089.3-10.7%
Cars.com Inc. (CARS)100200.0+100.0%
CarGurus, Inc. (CARG)100146.9+46.9%
Angi Inc. (ANGI)1004.8-95.2%
Yelp Inc. (YELP)100131.0+31.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: IAC vs CARS vs CARG vs ANGI vs YELP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CARG leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Cars.com Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. YELP also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
IAC
IAC InterActive Corp.
The Technology Pick

IAC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
CARS
Cars.com Inc.
The Income Pick

CARS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.27
  • Lower P/E (5.8x vs 13.7x)
Best for: income & stability
CARG
CarGurus, Inc.
The Growth Play

CARG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 5.0%, EPS growth 6.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -17.2%
  • 38.4% 10Y total return vs IAC's 347.8%
  • 5.0% revenue growth vs IAC's -37.1%
  • 15.6% margin vs IAC's 1.8%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
ANGI
Angi Inc.
The Value Angle

Among these 5 stocks, ANGI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: communication services exposure
YELP
Yelp Inc.
The Defensive Pick

YELP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 6.0%, current ratio 2.99x
  • Beta 0.82, current ratio 2.99x
  • Beta 0.82 vs ANGI's 1.85, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCARG logoCARG5.0% revenue growth vs IAC's -37.1%
ValueCARS logoCARSLower P/E (5.8x vs 13.7x)
Quality / MarginsCARG logoCARG15.6% margin vs IAC's 1.8%
Stability / SafetyYELP logoYELPBeta 0.82 vs ANGI's 1.85, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CARG logoCARG+34.6% vs ANGI's -65.4%
Efficiency (ROA)CARG logoCARG23.2% ROA vs IAC's 0.6%, ROIC 36.2% vs -1.2%

IAC vs CARS vs CARG vs ANGI vs YELP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

IACIAC InterActive Corp.
FY 2025
People Inc.
73.6%$1.8B
Care.com
14.5%$347M
Search
8.9%$213M
Emerging & Other
3.0%$71M
Intersegment Eliminations
-0.0%$-145,000
CARSCars.com Inc.
FY 2022
Subscription Advertising And Digital Solutions
82.7%$541M
Display Advertising
13.5%$88M
Other Major Product And Services
2.3%$15M
Pay Per Lead
1.4%$9M
CARGCarGurus, Inc.
FY 2024
Marketplace
89.1%$797M
Wholesale
5.7%$51M
Product
5.2%$47M
ANGIAngi Inc.
FY 2025
U.S. Segment
90.5%$43M
International Segment
9.5%$4M
YELPYelp Inc.
FY 2025
Advertising
48.7%$1.4B
Advertising, Services
33.2%$948M
Advertising, Restaurants and Other
15.5%$444M
Other Revenue
2.6%$74M

IAC vs CARS vs CARG vs ANGI vs YELP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCARGLAGGINGYELP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CARG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

IAC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.2B annually — 3.1x CARS's $724M. CARG is the more profitable business, keeping 15.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IAC's 1.8%. On growth, CARG holds the edge at +8.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricIAC logoIACIAC InterActive C…CARS logoCARSCars.com Inc.CARG logoCARGCarGurus, Inc.ANGI logoANGIAngi Inc.YELP logoYELPYelp Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.2B$724M$957M$1.0B$1.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$129M$152M$218M$86M$236M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$41M$27M$149M$20M$139M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$60M$158M$281M$26M$281M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+64.6%+82.9%+89.9%+91.1%+90.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+1.5%+9.7%+19.7%+4.8%+12.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.8%+3.7%+15.6%+1.9%+9.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+2.7%+21.8%+29.3%+2.5%+19.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-25.9%+0.7%+8.2%-3.2%+0.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+64.8%+3.6%-8.1%-163.3%-16.7%
CARG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ANGI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 5.6x trailing earnings, ANGI trades at a 86% valuation discount to CARS's 38.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ANGI's 3.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CARG's 16.6x.

MetricIAC logoIACIAC InterActive C…CARS logoCARSCars.com Inc.CARG logoCARGCarGurus, Inc.ANGI logoANGIAngi Inc.YELP logoYELPYelp Inc.
Market CapShares × price$3.2B$704M$3.8B$210M$1.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.7B$1.1B$3.8B$404M$1.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-32.42x38.56x24.62x5.57x12.71x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.109.69x5.84x15.14x6.10x13.74x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.37x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.30x7.34x16.64x3.22x6.18x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.34x0.97x4.02x0.20x1.15x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.70x1.61x9.87x0.26x2.61x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF71.54x4.78x13.06x4.62x5.23x
ANGI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CARG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

CARG delivers a 41.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $1 for IAC. YELP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CARS's 0.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CARS scores 7/9 vs IAC's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricIAC logoIACIAC InterActive C…CARS logoCARSCars.com Inc.CARG logoCARGCarGurus, Inc.ANGI logoANGIAngi Inc.YELP logoYELPYelp Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+0.9%+5.7%+41.9%+2.1%+19.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.6%+2.5%+23.2%+1.2%+14.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-1.2%+5.0%+36.2%+5.0%+25.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-1.3%+6.2%+30.1%+5.1%+22.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–957766
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.30x0.99x0.51x0.54x0.06x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$466M$412M$315,000$194M-$174M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$960M$56M$191M$304M$216M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.4B$468M$191M$498M$42M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense4.84x3.76x5.38x
CARG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CARG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CARG five years ago would be worth $13,952 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $386 for ANGI. Over the past 12 months, CARG leads with a +34.6% total return vs ANGI's -65.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CARG at 32.9% vs ANGI's -41.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricIAC logoIACIAC InterActive C…CARS logoCARSCars.com Inc.CARG logoCARGCarGurus, Inc.ANGI logoANGIAngi Inc.YELP logoYELPYelp Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+10.5%+2.5%+1.4%-58.6%-5.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+22.1%+9.0%+34.6%-65.4%-19.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-2.9%-31.3%+134.8%-79.5%+1.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-67.3%-11.8%+39.5%-96.1%-27.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+347.8%-54.8%+38.4%-94.1%+10.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-1.0%-11.8%+32.9%-41.1%+0.5%
CARG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CARG and YELP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

YELP is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ANGI's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CARG currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs ANGI's 27.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricIAC logoIACIAC InterActive C…CARS logoCARSCars.com Inc.CARG logoCARGCarGurus, Inc.ANGI logoANGIAngi Inc.YELP logoYELPYelp Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.10x1.27x0.89x1.85x0.82x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$45.78$13.97$39.42$19.42$41.22
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$29.56$7.40$26.39$4.53$19.60
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+94.2%+88.3%+96.8%+27.0%+69.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.168.960.426.157.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.1M1.5M1.1M1.2M1.1M
Evenly matched — CARG and YELP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CARS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: IAC as "Buy", CARS as "Buy", CARG as "Buy", ANGI as "Hold", YELP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 143.3% upside for ANGI (target: $13) vs -1.9% for CARG (target: $37).

MetricIAC logoIACIAC InterActive C…CARS logoCARSCars.com Inc.CARG logoCARGCarGurus, Inc.ANGI logoANGIAngi Inc.YELP logoYELPYelp Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$49.17$13.00$37.42$12.75$28.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts3316235467
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises21
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+9.8%+12.4%+9.3%+70.7%+17.3%
CARS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CARG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ANGI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallCarGurus, Inc. (CARG)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

IAC vs CARS vs CARG vs ANGI vs YELP: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is IAC or CARS or CARG or ANGI or YELP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, CarGurus, Inc.

(CARG) is the stronger pick with 5. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). Angi Inc. (ANGI) offers the better valuation at 5. 6x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — IAC or CARS or CARG or ANGI or YELP?

On trailing P/E, Angi Inc.

(ANGI) is the cheapest at 5. 6x versus Cars. com Inc. at 38. 6x. On forward P/E, Cars. com Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — IAC or CARS or CARG or ANGI or YELP?

Over the past 5 years, CarGurus, Inc.

(CARG) delivered a total return of +39. 5%, compared to -96. 1% for Angi Inc. (ANGI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IAC returned +347. 8% versus ANGI's -94. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — IAC or CARS or CARG or ANGI or YELP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Yelp Inc.

(YELP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Angi Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning ANGI is approximately 125% more volatile than YELP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Yelp Inc. (YELP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 99% for Cars. com Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — IAC or CARS or CARG or ANGI or YELP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CarGurus, Inc.

(CARG) is pulling ahead at 5. 0% versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CarGurus, Inc. grew EPS 675. 0% year-over-year, compared to -55. 6% for Cars. com Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, YELP leads at 7. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — IAC or CARS or CARG or ANGI or YELP?

CarGurus, Inc.

(CARG) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 6% net margin versus -4. 3% for IAC InterActive Corp. — meaning it keeps 16. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CARG leads at 20. 7% versus -4. 1% for IAC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ANGI leads at 90. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is IAC or CARS or CARG or ANGI or YELP more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Cars.

com Inc. (CARS) trades at 5. 8x forward P/E versus 109. 7x for IAC InterActive Corp. — 103. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ANGI: 143. 3% to $12. 75.

08

Which pays a better dividend — IAC or CARS or CARG or ANGI or YELP?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is IAC or CARS or CARG or ANGI or YELP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Yelp Inc.

(YELP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82)). Angi Inc. (ANGI) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (YELP: +10. 2%, ANGI: -94. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between IAC and CARS and CARG and ANGI and YELP?

These companies operate in different sectors (IAC (Technology) and CARS (Consumer Cyclical) and CARG (Consumer Cyclical) and ANGI (Communication Services) and YELP (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: IAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CARS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CARG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ANGI is a small-cap deep-value stock; YELP is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

IAC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CARS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 49%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CARG

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ANGI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 54%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

YELP

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform IAC and CARS and CARG and ANGI and YELP on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(IAC: -25.9% · CARS: 0.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.