Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IAC vs CARS vs CARG vs ANGI vs YELP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Dealerships
Auto - Dealerships
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
IAC vs CARS vs CARG vs ANGI vs YELP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Dealerships | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $3.21B | $704M | $3.77B | $210M | $1.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.25B | $724M | $957M | $1.02B | $1.47B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $41M | $27M | $149M | $20M | $139M |
| Gross Margin | 64.6% | 82.9% | 89.9% | 91.1% | 90.0% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | 9.7% | 19.7% | 4.8% | 12.4% |
| Forward P/E | 109.7x | 5.8x | 15.1x | 6.1x | 13.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.43B | $468M | $191M | $498M | $42M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $960M | $56M | $191M | $304M | $216M |
IAC vs CARS vs CARG vs ANGI vs YELP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| IAC InterActive Cor… (IAC) | 100 | 89.3 | -10.7% |
| Cars.com Inc. (CARS) | 100 | 200.0 | +100.0% |
| CarGurus, Inc. (CARG) | 100 | 146.9 | +46.9% |
| Angi Inc. (ANGI) | 100 | 4.8 | -95.2% |
| Yelp Inc. (YELP) | 100 | 131.0 | +31.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IAC vs CARS vs CARG vs ANGI vs YELP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IAC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CARS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.27
- Lower P/E (5.8x vs 13.7x)
CARG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.0%, EPS growth 6.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -17.2%
- 38.4% 10Y total return vs IAC's 347.8%
- 5.0% revenue growth vs IAC's -37.1%
- 15.6% margin vs IAC's 1.8%
Among these 5 stocks, ANGI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
YELP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 6.0%, current ratio 2.99x
- Beta 0.82, current ratio 2.99x
- Beta 0.82 vs ANGI's 1.85, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.0% revenue growth vs IAC's -37.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.8x vs 13.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.6% margin vs IAC's 1.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs ANGI's 1.85, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.6% vs ANGI's -65.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 23.2% ROA vs IAC's 0.6%, ROIC 36.2% vs -1.2% |
IAC vs CARS vs CARG vs ANGI vs YELP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IAC vs CARS vs CARG vs ANGI vs YELP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CARG leads in 3 of 6 categories
ANGI leads 1 • CARS leads 1 • IAC leads 0 • YELP leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CARG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IAC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.2B annually — 3.1x CARS's $724M. CARG is the more profitable business, keeping 15.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IAC's 1.8%. On growth, CARG holds the edge at +8.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.2B | $724M | $957M | $1.0B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $129M | $152M | $218M | $86M | $236M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $41M | $27M | $149M | $20M | $139M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $60M | $158M | $281M | $26M | $281M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.6% | +82.9% | +89.9% | +91.1% | +90.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +9.7% | +19.7% | +4.8% | +12.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | +3.7% | +15.6% | +1.9% | +9.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | +21.8% | +29.3% | +2.5% | +19.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.9% | +0.7% | +8.2% | -3.2% | +0.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +64.8% | +3.6% | -8.1% | -163.3% | -16.7% |
Valuation Metrics
ANGI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.6x trailing earnings, ANGI trades at a 86% valuation discount to CARS's 38.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ANGI's 3.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CARG's 16.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.2B | $704M | $3.8B | $210M | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.7B | $1.1B | $3.8B | $404M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -32.42x | 38.56x | 24.62x | 5.57x | 12.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 109.69x | 5.84x | 15.14x | 6.10x | 13.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.37x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.30x | 7.34x | 16.64x | 3.22x | 6.18x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.34x | 0.97x | 4.02x | 0.20x | 1.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.70x | 1.61x | 9.87x | 0.26x | 2.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 71.54x | 4.78x | 13.06x | 4.62x | 5.23x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CARG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CARG delivers a 41.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $1 for IAC. YELP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CARS's 0.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CARS scores 7/9 vs IAC's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.9% | +5.7% | +41.9% | +2.1% | +19.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +2.5% | +23.2% | +1.2% | +14.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.2% | +5.0% | +36.2% | +5.0% | +25.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.3% | +6.2% | +30.1% | +5.1% | +22.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | 0.99x | 0.51x | 0.54x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $466M | $412M | $315,000 | $194M | -$174M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $960M | $56M | $191M | $304M | $216M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.4B | $468M | $191M | $498M | $42M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.84x | 3.76x | — | 5.38x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CARG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CARG five years ago would be worth $13,952 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $386 for ANGI. Over the past 12 months, CARG leads with a +34.6% total return vs ANGI's -65.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CARG at 32.9% vs ANGI's -41.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.5% | +2.5% | +1.4% | -58.6% | -5.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.1% | +9.0% | +34.6% | -65.4% | -19.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.9% | -31.3% | +134.8% | -79.5% | +1.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.3% | -11.8% | +39.5% | -96.1% | -27.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +347.8% | -54.8% | +38.4% | -94.1% | +10.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.0% | -11.8% | +32.9% | -41.1% | +0.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CARG and YELP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
YELP is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ANGI's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CARG currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs ANGI's 27.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 1.27x | 0.89x | 1.85x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.78 | $13.97 | $39.42 | $19.42 | $41.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.56 | $7.40 | $26.39 | $4.53 | $19.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.2% | +88.3% | +96.8% | +27.0% | +69.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.1 | 68.9 | 60.4 | 26.1 | 57.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 1.5M | 1.1M | 1.2M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
CARS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IAC as "Buy", CARS as "Buy", CARG as "Buy", ANGI as "Hold", YELP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 143.3% upside for ANGI (target: $13) vs -1.9% for CARG (target: $37).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.17 | $13.00 | $37.42 | $12.75 | $28.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 33 | 16 | 23 | 54 | 67 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.8% | +12.4% | +9.3% | +70.7% | +17.3% |
CARG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ANGI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
IAC vs CARS vs CARG vs ANGI vs YELP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IAC or CARS or CARG or ANGI or YELP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CarGurus, Inc.
(CARG) is the stronger pick with 5. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). Angi Inc. (ANGI) offers the better valuation at 5. 6x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IAC or CARS or CARG or ANGI or YELP?
On trailing P/E, Angi Inc.
(ANGI) is the cheapest at 5. 6x versus Cars. com Inc. at 38. 6x. On forward P/E, Cars. com Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IAC or CARS or CARG or ANGI or YELP?
Over the past 5 years, CarGurus, Inc.
(CARG) delivered a total return of +39. 5%, compared to -96. 1% for Angi Inc. (ANGI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IAC returned +347. 8% versus ANGI's -94. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IAC or CARS or CARG or ANGI or YELP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Yelp Inc.
(YELP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Angi Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning ANGI is approximately 125% more volatile than YELP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Yelp Inc. (YELP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 99% for Cars. com Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IAC or CARS or CARG or ANGI or YELP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CarGurus, Inc.
(CARG) is pulling ahead at 5. 0% versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CarGurus, Inc. grew EPS 675. 0% year-over-year, compared to -55. 6% for Cars. com Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, YELP leads at 7. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IAC or CARS or CARG or ANGI or YELP?
CarGurus, Inc.
(CARG) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 6% net margin versus -4. 3% for IAC InterActive Corp. — meaning it keeps 16. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CARG leads at 20. 7% versus -4. 1% for IAC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ANGI leads at 90. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IAC or CARS or CARG or ANGI or YELP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Cars.
com Inc. (CARS) trades at 5. 8x forward P/E versus 109. 7x for IAC InterActive Corp. — 103. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ANGI: 143. 3% to $12. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — IAC or CARS or CARG or ANGI or YELP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is IAC or CARS or CARG or ANGI or YELP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Yelp Inc.
(YELP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82)). Angi Inc. (ANGI) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (YELP: +10. 2%, ANGI: -94. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IAC and CARS and CARG and ANGI and YELP?
These companies operate in different sectors (IAC (Technology) and CARS (Consumer Cyclical) and CARG (Consumer Cyclical) and ANGI (Communication Services) and YELP (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CARS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CARG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ANGI is a small-cap deep-value stock; YELP is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.