IAC vs ZETA vs TTD vs MGNI

For growth investors, Zeta Global Holdings Corp.

(ZETA) is the stronger pick with 29. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Magnite, Inc.

(MGNI) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus The Trade Desk, Inc. at 25. 8x. On forward P/E, Magnite, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 4x.

Over the past 5 years, Zeta Global Holdings Corp.

(ZETA) delivered a total return of +94. 4%, compared to -67. 3% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TTD returned +680. 4% versus MGNI's -4. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Trade Desk, Inc.

(TTD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 06β versus Zeta Global Holdings Corp. 's 2. 79β — meaning ZETA is approximately 163% more volatile than TTD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 30% for Magnite, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Zeta Global Holdings Corp.

(ZETA) is pulling ahead at 29. 7% versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Magnite, Inc. grew EPS 493. 8% year-over-year, compared to 16. 7% for The Trade Desk, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ZETA leads at 30. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Magnite, Inc.

(MGNI) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 3% net margin versus -4. 3% for IAC InterActive Corp. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TTD leads at 20. 3% versus -4. 1% for IAC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TTD leads at 78. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Magnite, Inc.

(MGNI) trades at 13. 4x forward P/E versus 109. 7x for IAC InterActive Corp. — 96. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TTD: 58. 0% to $37. 12.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Trade Desk, Inc.

(TTD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 06), +680. 4% 10Y return). Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA) carries a higher beta of 2. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TTD: +680. 4%, ZETA: +94. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (IAC (Technology) and ZETA (Technology) and TTD (Technology) and MGNI (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: IAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ZETA is a small-cap high-growth stock; TTD is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MGNI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.