Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
IBOC vs BOKF vs FFIN vs CADE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
IBOC vs BOKF vs FFIN vs CADE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $4.56B | $10.28B | $4.61B | $7.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.05B | $3.36B | $739M | $2.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $418M | $537M | $243M | $530M |
| Gross Margin | 78.3% | 57.1% | 70.8% | 59.3% |
| Operating Margin | 49.4% | 19.8% | 36.8% | 23.3% |
| Forward P/E | 10.9x | 13.0x | 15.9x | 12.1x |
| Total Debt | $705M | $4.45B | $197M | $34M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $536M | $1.43B | $763M | $1.73B |
IBOC vs BOKF vs FFIN vs CADE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| International Bancs… (IBOC) | 100 | 238.0 | +138.0% |
| BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF) | 100 | 262.0 | +162.0% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.7 | +5.7% |
| Cadence Bank (CADE) | 100 | 189.4 | +89.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IBOC vs BOKF vs FFIN vs CADE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IBOC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 1.9%
- 229.3% 10Y total return vs BOKF's 168.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 21.7%, current ratio 1.04x
- PEG 0.53 vs BOKF's 4.38
BOKF is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +44.8% vs FFIN's -3.2%
FFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 12.2%
CADE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and dividends is your priority.
- 32.4% NII/revenue growth vs IBOC's 1.0%
- 2.3% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs IBOC's 1.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.4% NII/revenue growth vs IBOC's 1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.9x vs 12.1x), PEG 0.53 vs 3.20 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BOKF's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs CADE's 1.41 | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs IBOC's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.8% vs FFIN's -3.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BOKF's 0.4% |
IBOC vs BOKF vs FFIN vs CADE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IBOC vs BOKF vs FFIN vs CADE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBOC leads in 3 of 6 categories
BOKF leads 0 • FFIN leads 0 • CADE leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IBOC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOKF is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 4.5x FFIN's $739M. IBOC is the more profitable business, keeping 39.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BOKF's 15.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $3.4B | $739M | $2.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $417M | $797M | $310M | $722M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $418M | $537M | $243M | $530M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $360M | $1.5B | $290M | $508M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.3% | +57.1% | +70.8% | +59.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +49.4% | +19.8% | +36.8% | +23.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +39.1% | +15.6% | +30.2% | +18.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +47.0% | +42.6% | +39.6% | +26.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +1.8% | -7.7% | -6.9% |
Valuation Metrics
IBOC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.1x trailing earnings, IBOC trades at a 47% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBOC offers better value at 0.54x vs BOKF's 5.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.6B | $10.3B | $4.6B | $7.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.7B | $13.3B | $4.0B | $6.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.07x | 16.39x | 20.76x | 15.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.87x | 13.05x | 15.92x | 12.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.54x | 5.51x | 3.98x | 4.01x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.69x | 17.23x | 14.17x | 7.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.32x | 3.06x | 6.23x | 2.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.40x | 1.53x | 2.89x | 1.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.21x | 7.19x | 15.73x | 10.10x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — FFIN and CADE each lead in 3 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $9 for CADE. CADE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOKF's 0.80x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.2% | +8.9% | +13.3% | +8.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.4% | +1.1% | +1.6% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.5% | +4.1% | +11.0% | +6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.4% | +5.5% | +16.0% | +10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.80x | 0.12x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $168M | $3.0B | -$566M | -$1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $536M | $1.4B | $763M | $1.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $705M | $4.5B | $197M | $34M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.91x | 0.55x | 1.48x | 0.66x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — IBOC and BOKF and CADE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBOC five years ago would be worth $16,131 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,178 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, BOKF leads with a +44.8% total return vs FFIN's -3.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CADE at 35.0% vs FFIN's 8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.7% | +13.0% | +8.5% | -1.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.1% | +44.8% | -3.2% | +44.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.6% | +79.4% | +29.1% | +146.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.3% | +59.4% | -28.2% | +52.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +229.3% | +168.5% | +145.4% | +122.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.5% | +21.5% | +8.9% | +35.0% |
Risk & Volatility
IBOC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IBOC is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CADE's 1.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IBOC currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 83.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 1.03x | 0.95x | 1.41x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $75.44 | $139.73 | $38.74 | $46.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $61.15 | $91.35 | $28.11 | $29.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.1% | +95.5% | +83.6% | +90.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.5 | 58.9 | 58.2 | 46.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 373K | 317K | 740K | 80.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IBOC and CADE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IBOC as "Buy", BOKF as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold", CADE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.2% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs -5.6% for CADE (target: $40). For income investors, CADE offers the higher dividend yield at 2.34% vs BOKF's 1.68%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $85.00 | $131.57 | $39.25 | $39.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 21 | 15 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | +1.7% | +2.2% | +2.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 16 | 11 | 11 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.40 | $2.24 | $0.72 | $0.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +0.9% | 0.0% | +0.5% |
IBOC leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 3 categories are tied.
IBOC vs BOKF vs FFIN vs CADE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IBOC or BOKF or FFIN or CADE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cadence Bank (CADE) is the stronger pick with 32.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC). International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) offers the better valuation at 11. 1x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IBOC or BOKF or FFIN or CADE?
On trailing P/E, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the cheapest at 11.
1x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, International Bancshares Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: International Bancshares Corporation wins at 0. 53x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 38x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IBOC or BOKF or FFIN or CADE?
Over the past 5 years, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) delivered a total return of +61.
3%, compared to -28. 2% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBOC returned +229. 3% versus CADE's +122. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IBOC or BOKF or FFIN or CADE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
83β versus Cadence Bank's 1. 41β — meaning CADE is approximately 70% more volatile than IBOC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cadence Bank (CADE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 80% for BOK Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IBOC or BOKF or FFIN or CADE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cadence Bank (CADE) is pulling ahead at 32.
4% versus 1. 0% for International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Financial Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 12. 2% year-over-year, compared to -5. 1% for Cadence Bank. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IBOC or BOKF or FFIN or CADE?
International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the more profitable company, earning 39.
1% net margin versus 15. 6% for BOK Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 39. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBOC leads at 49. 4% versus 19. 8% for BOKF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBOC leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IBOC or BOKF or FFIN or CADE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 53x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 38x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 5. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 21. 2% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — IBOC or BOKF or FFIN or CADE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Cadence Bank (CADE) offers the highest yield at 2. 3%, versus 1. 7% for BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF).
09Is IBOC or BOKF or FFIN or CADE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 1. 9% yield, +229. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBOC: +229. 3%, CADE: +122. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IBOC and BOKF and FFIN and CADE?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IBOC is a small-cap deep-value stock; BOKF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; CADE is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.