Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ICCC vs PETZ vs ELAN vs IDXX vs ZTS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
ICCC vs PETZ vs ELAN vs IDXX vs ZTS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Packaged Foods | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $73M | $10M | $11.81B | $44.49B | $34.96B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $28M | $2M | $4.89B | $4.45B | $9.51B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $3M | $-242M | $1.10B | $2.64B |
| Gross Margin | 40.9% | -12.3% | 49.4% | 62.1% | 70.8% |
| Operating Margin | 8.4% | -203.8% | 9.0% | 31.6% | 37.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 5.6x | 22.4x | 38.3x | 11.9x |
| Total Debt | $15M | $4M | $4.02B | $1.08B | $9.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $19M | $545M | $180M | $2.31B |
ICCC vs PETZ vs ELAN vs IDXX vs ZTS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ImmuCell Corporation (ICCC) | 100 | 178.5 | +78.5% |
| TDH Holdings, Inc. (PETZ) | 100 | 4.9 | -95.1% |
| Elanco Animal Healt… (ELAN) | 100 | 110.5 | +10.5% |
| IDEXX Laboratories,… (IDXX) | 100 | 181.3 | +81.3% |
| Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) | 100 | 59.4 | -40.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ICCC vs PETZ vs ELAN vs IDXX vs ZTS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ICCC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 51.6%, EPS growth 65.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.2%
PETZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.29
- Lower volatility, beta 0.29, Low D/E 13.3%, current ratio 5.08x
- Beta 0.29, current ratio 5.08x
- 122.0% revenue growth vs ZTS's 2.3%
ELAN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +92.6% vs ZTS's -47.5%
IDXX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 5.4% 10Y total return vs ICCC's 16.2%
- 32.6% ROA vs ELAN's -1.8%, ROIC 42.5% vs 1.9%
ZTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.99 vs IDXX's 2.68
- Lower P/E (11.9x vs 38.3x), PEG 0.99 vs 2.68
- 2.4% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 122.0% revenue growth vs ZTS's 2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.9x vs 38.3x), PEG 0.99 vs 2.68 | |
| Quality / Margins | 190.9% margin vs ELAN's -4.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.29 vs ELAN's 1.46, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +92.6% vs ZTS's -47.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 32.6% ROA vs ELAN's -1.8%, ROIC 42.5% vs 1.9% |
ICCC vs PETZ vs ELAN vs IDXX vs ZTS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ICCC vs PETZ vs ELAN vs IDXX vs ZTS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ZTS leads in 2 of 6 categories
IDXX leads 1 • ELAN leads 1 • ICCC leads 0 • PETZ leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZTS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZTS is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.5B annually — 5239.2x PETZ's $2M. PETZ is the more profitable business, keeping 190.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ELAN's -4.9%. On growth, PETZ holds the edge at +44.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $28M | $2M | $4.9B | $4.4B | $9.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | -$2M | $957M | $1.5B | $4.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $3M | -$242M | $1.1B | $2.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $715,351 | -$4M | $315M | $845M | $2.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.9% | -12.3% | +49.4% | +62.1% | +70.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | -2.0% | +9.0% | +31.6% | +37.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +190.9% | -4.9% | +24.6% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | -2.3% | +6.4% | +19.0% | +22.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.4% | +44.6% | +14.9% | +14.3% | +1.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +82.1% | +21.5% | -15.4% | +16.6% | +0.7% |
Valuation Metrics
ZTS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.6x trailing earnings, PETZ trades at a 87% valuation discount to IDXX's 42.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ZTS offers better value at 1.15x vs IDXX's 3.00x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $73M | $10M | $11.8B | $44.5B | $35.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $84M | -$5M | $15.3B | $45.4B | $42.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -30.96x | 5.65x | -50.32x | 42.82x | 13.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 22.43x | 38.29x | 11.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 3.00x | 1.15x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 80.38x | — | 16.40x | 30.95x | 10.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.75x | 7.92x | 2.51x | 10.34x | 3.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.39x | 0.32x | 1.79x | 28.15x | 11.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 41.59x | 42.23x | 15.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IDXX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IDXX delivers a 70.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $71 in annual profit, vs $-4 for ELAN. PETZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ZTS's 2.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICCC scores 7/9 vs PETZ's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.0% | +12.1% | -3.6% | +70.9% | +62.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.1% | +9.8% | -1.8% | +32.6% | +17.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.1% | -9.2% | +1.9% | +42.5% | +26.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.1% | -5.8% | +2.2% | +61.4% | +29.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.55x | 0.13x | 0.61x | 0.67x | 2.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $11M | -$15M | $3.5B | $897M | $7.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $19M | $545M | $180M | $2.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $4M | $4.0B | $1.1B | $9.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.28x | -3.18x | 0.87x | 35.55x | 14.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ELAN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IDXX five years ago would be worth $10,663 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $230 for PETZ. Over the past 12 months, ELAN leads with a +92.6% total return vs ZTS's -47.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ELAN at 36.2% vs ZTS's -21.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +36.0% | +2.7% | +5.0% | -16.4% | -33.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +56.6% | -9.4% | +92.6% | +14.3% | -47.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.6% | -21.3% | +152.7% | +15.4% | -52.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.0% | -97.7% | -26.6% | +6.6% | -46.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.2% | -99.3% | -34.3% | +542.3% | +97.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.6% | -7.7% | +36.2% | +4.9% | -21.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ICCC and PETZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PETZ is the less volatile stock with a 0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ELAN's 1.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ICCC currently trades 88.7% from its 52-week high vs ZTS's 48.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.38x | 0.29x | 1.46x | 1.36x | 0.88x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.08 | $1.68 | $27.72 | $769.98 | $172.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.52 | $0.65 | $11.83 | $485.41 | $81.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.7% | +57.1% | +85.3% | +72.7% | +48.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.8 | 37.4 | 53.8 | 49.2 | 15.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 20K | 4K | 4.7M | 535K | 4.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ELAN as "Buy", IDXX as "Buy", ZTS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 61.3% upside for ZTS (target: $134) vs 18.4% for ELAN (target: $28). ZTS is the only dividend payer here at 2.42% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $28.00 | $747.50 | $133.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 20 | 22 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $2.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.7% | +9.3% |
ZTS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IDXX leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
ICCC vs PETZ vs ELAN vs IDXX vs ZTS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ICCC or PETZ or ELAN or IDXX or ZTS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TDH Holdings, Inc.
(PETZ) is the stronger pick with 122. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 3% for Zoetis Inc. (ZTS). TDH Holdings, Inc. (PETZ) offers the better valuation at 5. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Elanco Animal Health Incorporated (ELAN) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ICCC or PETZ or ELAN or IDXX or ZTS?
On trailing P/E, TDH Holdings, Inc.
(PETZ) is the cheapest at 5. 6x versus IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. at 42. 8x. On forward P/E, Zoetis Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Zoetis Inc. wins at 0. 99x versus IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. 's 2. 68x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ICCC or PETZ or ELAN or IDXX or ZTS?
Over the past 5 years, IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
(IDXX) delivered a total return of +6. 6%, compared to -97. 7% for TDH Holdings, Inc. (PETZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IDXX returned +542. 3% versus PETZ's -99. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ICCC or PETZ or ELAN or IDXX or ZTS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TDH Holdings, Inc.
(PETZ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 29β versus Elanco Animal Health Incorporated's 1. 46β — meaning ELAN is approximately 401% more volatile than PETZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TDH Holdings, Inc. (PETZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 3% for Zoetis Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ICCC or PETZ or ELAN or IDXX or ZTS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TDH Holdings, Inc.
(PETZ) is pulling ahead at 122. 0% versus 2. 3% for Zoetis Inc. (ZTS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ImmuCell Corporation grew EPS 65. 3% year-over-year, compared to -169. 1% for Elanco Animal Health Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, ICCC leads at 11. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ICCC or PETZ or ELAN or IDXX or ZTS?
TDH Holdings, Inc.
(PETZ) is the more profitable company, earning 143. 8% net margin versus -8. 1% for ImmuCell Corporation — meaning it keeps 143. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ZTS leads at 38. 0% versus -146. 3% for PETZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZTS leads at 70. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ICCC or PETZ or ELAN or IDXX or ZTS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 99x versus IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. 's 2. 68x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) trades at 11. 9x forward P/E versus 38. 3x for IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. — 26. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ZTS: 61. 3% to $133. 57.
08Which pays a better dividend — ICCC or PETZ or ELAN or IDXX or ZTS?
In this comparison, ZTS (2.
4% yield) pays a dividend. ICCC, PETZ, ELAN, IDXX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ICCC or PETZ or ELAN or IDXX or ZTS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Zoetis Inc.
(ZTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 88), 2. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ZTS: +97. 8%, ELAN: -34. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ICCC and PETZ and ELAN and IDXX and ZTS?
These companies operate in different sectors (ICCC (Healthcare) and PETZ (Consumer Defensive) and ELAN (Healthcare) and IDXX (Healthcare) and ZTS (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ICCC is a small-cap high-growth stock; PETZ is a small-cap high-growth stock; ELAN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; IDXX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ZTS is a mid-cap deep-value stock. ZTS pays a dividend while ICCC, PETZ, ELAN, IDXX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.