Asset Management
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ICMB vs GLAD vs ARCC vs FSCO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
ICMB vs GLAD vs ARCC vs FSCO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $24M | $452M | $13.61B | $1.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $23M | $145M | $3.15B | $254M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $28M | $1.15B | $188M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 87.3% | 75.7% | 81.3% |
| Operating Margin | 65.0% | 55.5% | 69.7% | 77.5% |
| Forward P/E | 2.0x | 10.3x | 9.9x | 5.4x |
| Total Debt | $122M | $398M | $15.99B | $453M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $771K | $32M | $924M | $189M |
ICMB vs GLAD vs ARCC vs FSCO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Investcorp Credit M… (ICMB) | 100 | 42.5 | -57.5% |
| Gladstone Capital C… (GLAD) | 100 | 97.8 | -2.2% |
| Ares Capital Corpor… (ARCC) | 100 | 96.5 | -3.5% |
| FS Credit Opportuni… (FSCO) | 100 | 100.5 | +0.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ICMB vs GLAD vs ARCC vs FSCO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ICMB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.26, yield 14.3%
- Beta 0.26, yield 14.3%, current ratio 2.05x
- Lower P/E (2.0x vs 5.4x)
- Beta 0.26 vs ARCC's 0.77
GLAD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 174.7% 10Y total return vs ARCC's 139.2%
ARCC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 32.9%, EPS growth -23.8%
- 32.9% NII/revenue growth vs FSCO's -17.4%
- +0.4% vs ICMB's -26.6%
FSCO is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and bank quality.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 31.9%, current ratio 5.84x
- NIM 8.9% vs ARCC's 3.6%
- Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs ICMB's 0.3% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs ICMB's 0.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.9% NII/revenue growth vs FSCO's -17.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.0x vs 5.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs ICMB's 0.3% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.26 vs ARCC's 0.77 | |
| Dividends | 14.3% yield, vs GLAD's 12.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +0.4% vs ICMB's -26.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs ICMB's 0.3% |
ICMB vs GLAD vs ARCC vs FSCO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FSCO leads in 2 of 6 categories
ICMB leads 1 • GLAD leads 0 • ARCC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ARCC and FSCO each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARCC is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 135.3x ICMB's $23M. FSCO is the more profitable business, keeping 74.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GLAD's 40.1%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $23M | $145M | $3.1B | $254M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $0 | $28M | $2.0B | — |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $28M | $1.1B | — |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | -$70M | $1.1B | — |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +87.3% | +75.7% | +81.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +65.0% | +55.5% | +69.7% | +77.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +52.0% | +40.1% | +41.3% | +74.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -58.2% | +30.1% | +36.3% | +26.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -92.4% | -100.0% | -63.9% | — |
Valuation Metrics
ICMB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.0x trailing earnings, ICMB trades at a 80% valuation discount to ARCC's 10.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FSCO's 6.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ARCC's 13.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $24M | $452M | $13.6B | $1.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $145M | $817M | $28.7B | $1.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.99x | 7.84x | 10.19x | 5.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.31x | 9.92x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.99x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.68x | 13.09x | 6.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.04x | 3.12x | 4.33x | 4.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.31x | 0.94x | 0.93x | 0.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.35x | 11.92x | 15.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FSCO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FSCO delivers a 13.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $2 for ICMB. FSCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ICMB's 1.57x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GLAD scores 5/9 vs ICMB's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.4% | +5.7% | +8.1% | +13.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +3.2% | +3.8% | +8.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.7% | +7.2% | +5.7% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.6% | +9.4% | +7.5% | +9.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.57x | 0.83x | 1.12x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $121M | $365M | $15.1B | $264M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $771,483 | $32M | $924M | $189M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $122M | $398M | $16.0B | $453M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.10x | 1.27x | 2.98x | 4.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FSCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FSCO five years ago would be worth $17,050 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,538 for ICMB. Over the past 12 months, ARCC leads with a +0.4% total return vs ICMB's -26.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FSCO at 19.7% vs ICMB's -0.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -37.9% | -0.5% | -4.9% | -15.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.6% | -12.8% | +0.4% | -16.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.5% | +40.4% | +34.2% | +71.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.6% | +34.8% | +47.0% | +70.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.5% | +174.7% | +139.2% | +70.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.5% | +12.0% | +10.3% | +19.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ICMB and ARCC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ICMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARCC's 0.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARCC currently trades 81.0% from its 52-week high vs ICMB's 53.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.26x | 0.73x | 0.77x | 0.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.12 | $29.50 | $23.42 | $7.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.29 | $16.54 | $17.40 | $4.13 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.5% | +67.8% | +81.0% | +67.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.6 | 58.0 | 56.7 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 60K | 224K | 7.5M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ICMB and GLAD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GLAD as "Hold", ARCC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.4% upside for ARCC (target: $22) vs 8.4% for GLAD (target: $22). For income investors, ICMB offers the higher dividend yield at 14.31% vs ARCC's 2.02%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $21.67 | $21.88 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 | 32 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +14.3% | +12.2% | +2.0% | +13.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.24 | $2.45 | $0.38 | $0.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FSCO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ICMB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
ICMB vs GLAD vs ARCC vs FSCO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ICMB or GLAD or ARCC or FSCO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the stronger pick with 32.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 4% for FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO). Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc. (ICMB) offers the better valuation at 2. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ICMB or GLAD or ARCC or FSCO?
On trailing P/E, Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc.
(ICMB) is the cheapest at 2. 0x versus Ares Capital Corporation at 10. 2x. On forward P/E, Ares Capital Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ICMB or GLAD or ARCC or FSCO?
Over the past 5 years, FS Credit Opportunities Corp.
(FSCO) delivered a total return of +70. 5%, compared to -24. 6% for Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc. (ICMB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GLAD returned +174. 7% versus ICMB's +9. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ICMB or GLAD or ARCC or FSCO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc.
(ICMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 26β versus Ares Capital Corporation's 0. 77β — meaning ARCC is approximately 194% more volatile than ICMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 157% for Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ICMB or GLAD or ARCC or FSCO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is pulling ahead at 32.
9% versus -17. 4% for FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc. grew EPS 400. 0% year-over-year, compared to -41. 2% for Gladstone Capital Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ICMB or GLAD or ARCC or FSCO?
FS Credit Opportunities Corp.
(FSCO) is the more profitable company, earning 74. 2% net margin versus 40. 1% for Gladstone Capital Corporation — meaning it keeps 74. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSCO leads at 77. 5% versus 55. 5% for GLAD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ICMB leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ICMB or GLAD or ARCC or FSCO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) trades at 9.
9x forward P/E versus 10. 3x for Gladstone Capital Corporation — 0. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ARCC: 15. 4% to $21. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — ICMB or GLAD or ARCC or FSCO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc. (ICMB) offers the highest yield at 14. 3%, versus 2. 0% for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC).
09Is ICMB or GLAD or ARCC or FSCO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc.
(ICMB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 26), 14. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICMB: +9. 5%, ARCC: +139. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ICMB and GLAD and ARCC and FSCO?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ICMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; GLAD is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARCC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FSCO is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.