Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ICMB vs GLAD vs ARCC vs FSCO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ICMB
Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$24M
5Y Perf.-57.5%
GLAD
Gladstone Capital Corporation

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$452M
5Y Perf.-2.2%
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$13.61B
5Y Perf.-3.5%
FSCO
FS Credit Opportunities Corp.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.02B
5Y Perf.+0.5%

ICMB vs GLAD vs ARCC vs FSCO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ICMB logoICMB
GLAD logoGLAD
ARCC logoARCC
FSCO logoFSCO
IndustryAsset ManagementAsset ManagementAsset ManagementAsset Management
Market Cap$24M$452M$13.61B$1.02B
Revenue (TTM)$23M$145M$3.15B$254M
Net Income (TTM)$2M$28M$1.15B$188M
Gross Margin100.0%87.3%75.7%81.3%
Operating Margin65.0%55.5%69.7%77.5%
Forward P/E2.0x10.3x9.9x5.4x
Total Debt$122M$398M$15.99B$453M
Cash & Equiv.$771K$32M$924M$189M

ICMB vs GLAD vs ARCC vs FSCOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ICMB
GLAD
ARCC
FSCO
StockNov 22May 26Return
Investcorp Credit M… (ICMB)10042.5-57.5%
Gladstone Capital C… (GLAD)10097.8-2.2%
Ares Capital Corpor… (ARCC)10096.5-3.5%
FS Credit Opportuni… (FSCO)100100.5+0.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ICMB vs GLAD vs ARCC vs FSCO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ICMB leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Ares Capital Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. FSCO also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ICMB
Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc.
The Banking Pick

ICMB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.26, yield 14.3%
  • Beta 0.26, yield 14.3%, current ratio 2.05x
  • Lower P/E (2.0x vs 5.4x)
  • Beta 0.26 vs ARCC's 0.77
Best for: income & stability and defensive
GLAD
Gladstone Capital Corporation
The Banking Pick

GLAD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 174.7% 10Y total return vs ARCC's 139.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation
The Banking Pick

ARCC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 32.9%, EPS growth -23.8%
  • 32.9% NII/revenue growth vs FSCO's -17.4%
  • +0.4% vs ICMB's -26.6%
Best for: growth exposure
FSCO
FS Credit Opportunities Corp.
The Banking Pick

FSCO is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and bank quality.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 31.9%, current ratio 5.84x
  • NIM 8.9% vs ARCC's 3.6%
  • Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs ICMB's 0.3% (lower = leaner)
  • Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs ICMB's 0.3%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and bank quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthARCC logoARCC32.9% NII/revenue growth vs FSCO's -17.4%
ValueICMB logoICMBLower P/E (2.0x vs 5.4x)
Quality / MarginsFSCO logoFSCOEfficiency ratio 0.0% vs ICMB's 0.3% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyICMB logoICMBBeta 0.26 vs ARCC's 0.77
DividendsICMB logoICMB14.3% yield, vs GLAD's 12.2%
Momentum (1Y)ARCC logoARCC+0.4% vs ICMB's -26.6%
Efficiency (ROA)FSCO logoFSCOEfficiency ratio 0.0% vs ICMB's 0.3%

ICMB vs GLAD vs ARCC vs FSCO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFSCOLAGGINGARCC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — ARCC and FSCO each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

ARCC is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 135.3x ICMB's $23M. FSCO is the more profitable business, keeping 74.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GLAD's 40.1%.

MetricICMB logoICMBInvestcorp Credit…GLAD logoGLADGladstone Capital…ARCC logoARCCAres Capital Corp…FSCO logoFSCOFS Credit Opportu…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$23M$145M$3.1B$254M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$0$28M$2.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2M$28M$1.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$7M-$70M$1.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+100.0%+87.3%+75.7%+81.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+65.0%+55.5%+69.7%+77.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+52.0%+40.1%+41.3%+74.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-58.2%+30.1%+36.3%+26.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-92.4%-100.0%-63.9%
Evenly matched — ARCC and FSCO each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ICMB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 2.0x trailing earnings, ICMB trades at a 80% valuation discount to ARCC's 10.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FSCO's 6.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ARCC's 13.1x.

MetricICMB logoICMBInvestcorp Credit…GLAD logoGLADGladstone Capital…ARCC logoARCCAres Capital Corp…FSCO logoFSCOFS Credit Opportu…
Market CapShares × price$24M$452M$13.6B$1.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$145M$817M$28.7B$1.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS1.99x7.84x10.19x5.42x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.31x9.92x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.99x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.68x13.09x6.53x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.04x3.12x4.33x4.02x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.31x0.94x0.93x0.72x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.35x11.92x15.21x
ICMB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FSCO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

FSCO delivers a 13.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $2 for ICMB. FSCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ICMB's 1.57x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GLAD scores 5/9 vs ICMB's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricICMB logoICMBInvestcorp Credit…GLAD logoGLADGladstone Capital…ARCC logoARCCAres Capital Corp…FSCO logoFSCOFS Credit Opportu…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+2.4%+5.7%+8.1%+13.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.9%+3.2%+3.8%+8.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.7%+7.2%+5.7%+8.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.6%+9.4%+7.5%+9.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92543
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.57x0.83x1.12x0.32x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$121M$365M$15.1B$264M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$771,483$32M$924M$189M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$122M$398M$16.0B$453M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.10x1.27x2.98x4.14x
FSCO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FSCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FSCO five years ago would be worth $17,050 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,538 for ICMB. Over the past 12 months, ARCC leads with a +0.4% total return vs ICMB's -26.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FSCO at 19.7% vs ICMB's -0.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricICMB logoICMBInvestcorp Credit…GLAD logoGLADGladstone Capital…ARCC logoARCCAres Capital Corp…FSCO logoFSCOFS Credit Opportu…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-37.9%-0.5%-4.9%-15.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-26.6%-12.8%+0.4%-16.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-1.5%+40.4%+34.2%+71.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-24.6%+34.8%+47.0%+70.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+9.5%+174.7%+139.2%+70.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-0.5%+12.0%+10.3%+19.7%
FSCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ICMB and ARCC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ICMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARCC's 0.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARCC currently trades 81.0% from its 52-week high vs ICMB's 53.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricICMB logoICMBInvestcorp Credit…GLAD logoGLADGladstone Capital…ARCC logoARCCAres Capital Corp…FSCO logoFSCOFS Credit Opportu…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.26x0.73x0.77x0.64x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.12$29.50$23.42$7.65
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.29$16.54$17.40$4.13
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+53.5%+67.8%+81.0%+67.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10041.658.056.754.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded60K224K7.5M2.0M
Evenly matched — ICMB and ARCC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — ICMB and GLAD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: GLAD as "Hold", ARCC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.4% upside for ARCC (target: $22) vs 8.4% for GLAD (target: $22). For income investors, ICMB offers the higher dividend yield at 14.31% vs ARCC's 2.02%.

MetricICMB logoICMBInvestcorp Credit…GLAD logoGLADGladstone Capital…ARCC logoARCCAres Capital Corp…FSCO logoFSCOFS Credit Opportu…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$21.67$21.88
# AnalystsCovering analysts1432
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+14.3%+12.2%+2.0%+13.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0403
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.24$2.45$0.38$0.72
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — ICMB and GLAD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FSCO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ICMB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallFS Credit Opportunities Cor… (FSCO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ICMB vs GLAD vs ARCC vs FSCO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ICMB or GLAD or ARCC or FSCO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the stronger pick with 32.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 4% for FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO). Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc. (ICMB) offers the better valuation at 2. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ICMB or GLAD or ARCC or FSCO?

On trailing P/E, Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc.

(ICMB) is the cheapest at 2. 0x versus Ares Capital Corporation at 10. 2x. On forward P/E, Ares Capital Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ICMB or GLAD or ARCC or FSCO?

Over the past 5 years, FS Credit Opportunities Corp.

(FSCO) delivered a total return of +70. 5%, compared to -24. 6% for Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc. (ICMB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GLAD returned +174. 7% versus ICMB's +9. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ICMB or GLAD or ARCC or FSCO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc.

(ICMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 26β versus Ares Capital Corporation's 0. 77β — meaning ARCC is approximately 194% more volatile than ICMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 157% for Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ICMB or GLAD or ARCC or FSCO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is pulling ahead at 32.

9% versus -17. 4% for FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc. grew EPS 400. 0% year-over-year, compared to -41. 2% for Gladstone Capital Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ICMB or GLAD or ARCC or FSCO?

FS Credit Opportunities Corp.

(FSCO) is the more profitable company, earning 74. 2% net margin versus 40. 1% for Gladstone Capital Corporation — meaning it keeps 74. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSCO leads at 77. 5% versus 55. 5% for GLAD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ICMB leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ICMB or GLAD or ARCC or FSCO more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) trades at 9.

9x forward P/E versus 10. 3x for Gladstone Capital Corporation — 0. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ARCC: 15. 4% to $21. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ICMB or GLAD or ARCC or FSCO?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc. (ICMB) offers the highest yield at 14. 3%, versus 2. 0% for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC).

09

Is ICMB or GLAD or ARCC or FSCO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc.

(ICMB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 26), 14. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICMB: +9. 5%, ARCC: +139. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ICMB and GLAD and ARCC and FSCO?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ICMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; GLAD is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARCC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FSCO is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ICMB

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 31%
  • Dividend Yield > 5.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GLAD

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ARCC

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Net Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FSCO

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 44%
  • Dividend Yield > 5.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ICMB and GLAD and ARCC and FSCO on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ICMB: 0.0% · GLAD: 20.4%)
Net Margin>
%
(ICMB: 52.0% · GLAD: 40.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(ICMB: 2.0x · GLAD: 7.8x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.