Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
IDAI vs ACXP vs PRAX vs AIOT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Communication Equipment
IDAI vs ACXP vs PRAX vs AIOT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $3M | $5M | $9.63B | $463M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $0.00 | $-92K | $436M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $-7.97B | $-327M | $-32M |
| Gross Margin | 60.0% | — | — | 55.2% |
| Operating Margin | -183.3% | — | — | 1.7% |
| Total Debt | $4M | $0.00 | $110K | $287M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $7.56B | $357M | $49M |
IDAI vs ACXP vs PRAX vs AIOT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| T Stamp Inc. (IDAI) | 100 | 35.7 | -64.3% |
| Acurx Pharmaceutica… (ACXP) | 100 | 4.7 | -95.3% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 805.8 | +705.8% |
| PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT) | 100 | 74.4 | -25.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IDAI vs ACXP vs PRAX vs AIOT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IDAI plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
ACXP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PRAX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.55
- -20.1% 10Y total return vs IDAI's 102.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.55, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 10.22x
- Beta 1.55, current ratio 10.22x
AIOT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 66.3%, EPS growth 60.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 42.2%
- 66.3% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
- 22.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
- -3.4% ROA vs ACXP's -413.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 66.3% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.4% margin vs IDAI's -316.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.55 vs AIOT's 2.70, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 22.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs ACXP's -70.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.4% ROA vs ACXP's -413.5% |
IDAI vs ACXP vs PRAX vs AIOT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IDAI vs ACXP vs PRAX vs AIOT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AIOT leads in 2 of 6 categories
PRAX leads 2 • IDAI leads 0 • ACXP leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AIOT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AIOT and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $436M and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -7.4% (AIOT) to -3.2% (IDAI). On growth, IDAI holds the edge at +70.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $0 | -$92,000 | $436M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $35,910 | -$357M | $69M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | -$8.0B | -$327M | -$32M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | $4.6B | -$283M | $3M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.0% | — | — | +55.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -183.3% | — | — | +1.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | — | — | -7.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | — | — | +0.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +70.7% | — | — | +47.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.1% | +98.2% | +2.7% | -25.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — IDAI and ACXP and PRAX each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $5M | $9.6B | $463M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | -$7.6B | $9.3B | $701M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.22x | -0.40x | -24.72x | -7.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 44.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.89x | — | — | 1.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.86x | 0.00x | 8.54x | 0.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AIOT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AIOT delivers a -6.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-7 in annual profit, vs $-6 for ACXP. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IDAI's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACXP scores 3/9 vs IDAI's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -189.5% | -6.0% | -43.0% | -6.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -105.4% | -4.1% | -40.2% | -3.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.2% | — | -65.0% | -4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -194.9% | — | -49.3% | -5.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.30x | — | 0.00x | 0.64x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1M | -$7.6B | -$357M | $238M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $7.6B | $357M | $49M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $0 | $110,000 | $287M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -22.08x | — | — | 0.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PRAX five years ago would be worth $7,918 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $95 for IDAI. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs ACXP's -70.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs ACXP's -67.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -38.4% | -23.2% | +16.4% | -35.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.9% | -70.1% | +775.0% | -32.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.5% | -96.5% | +1976.5% | -28.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.1% | -98.7% | -20.8% | -28.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +102.4% | -98.7% | -20.1% | -28.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -50.0% | -67.4% | +174.9% | -10.7% |
Risk & Volatility
PRAX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PRAX is the less volatile stock with a 1.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AIOT's 2.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs ACXP's 10.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.99x | 2.42x | 1.55x | 2.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.28 | $21.00 | $356.00 | $6.07 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.80 | $1.33 | $35.18 | $2.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +47.2% | +10.1% | +93.6% | +56.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.1 | 40.9 | 55.6 | 52.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 43K | 3.6M | 378K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PRAX as "Buy", AIOT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 135.3% upside for AIOT (target: $8) vs 63.3% for PRAX (target: $544). AIOT is the only dividend payer here at 22.15% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $544.40 | $8.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 16 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +22.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.1% | +100.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% |
AIOT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRAX leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
IDAI vs ACXP vs PRAX vs AIOT: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IDAI or ACXP or PRAX or AIOT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, T Stamp Inc.
(IDAI) is the stronger pick with -32. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Analysts rate Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — IDAI or ACXP or PRAX or AIOT?
Over the past 5 years, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
(PRAX) delivered a total return of -20. 8%, compared to -99. 1% for T Stamp Inc. (IDAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IDAI returned +102. 4% versus ACXP's -98. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — IDAI or ACXP or PRAX or AIOT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
(PRAX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 55β versus PowerFleet, Inc. 's 2. 70β — meaning AIOT is approximately 75% more volatile than PRAX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 130% for T Stamp Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — IDAI or ACXP or PRAX or AIOT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), T Stamp Inc.
(IDAI) is pulling ahead at -32. 4% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Acurx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 69. 8% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIOT leads at 42. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — IDAI or ACXP or PRAX or AIOT?
Acurx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ACXP) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -344. 1% for T Stamp Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACXP leads at 0. 0% versus -303. 9% for IDAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IDAI leads at 65. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — IDAI or ACXP or PRAX or AIOT?
In this comparison, AIOT (22.
2% yield) pays a dividend. IDAI, ACXP, PRAX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is IDAI or ACXP or PRAX or AIOT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PowerFleet, Inc.
(AIOT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (22. 2% yield). Acurx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ACXP) carries a higher beta of 2. 42 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AIOT: -28. 7%, ACXP: -98. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between IDAI and ACXP and PRAX and AIOT?
These companies operate in different sectors (IDAI (Technology) and ACXP (Healthcare) and PRAX (Healthcare) and AIOT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IDAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACXP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AIOT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. AIOT pays a dividend while IDAI, ACXP, PRAX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.