Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IDN vs AUID vs IDCC vs QLYS vs VRNS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
IDN vs AUID vs IDCC vs QLYS vs VRNS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $149M | $17M | $7.20B | $3.32B | $3.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $2M | $829M | $685M | $660M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $-18M | $366M | $201M | $-137M |
| Gross Margin | — | 96.5% | 83.4% | 83.1% | 78.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -10.2% | 49.6% | 33.7% | -21.9% |
| Forward P/E | 71.4x | — | 38.8x | 12.4x | 241.0x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $241K | $506M | $97M | $572M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $8M | $739M | $250M | $202M |
IDN vs AUID vs IDCC vs QLYS vs VRNS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intellicheck, Inc. (IDN) | 100 | 88.2 | -11.8% |
| authID Inc. (AUID) | 100 | 1.4 | -98.6% |
| InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) | 100 | 382.9 | +282.9% |
| Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) | 100 | 93.6 | -6.4% |
| Varonis Systems, In… (VRNS) | 100 | 49.5 | -50.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IDN vs AUID vs IDCC vs QLYS vs VRNS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IDN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.33
- Lower volatility, beta 0.33, current ratio 3.68x
- Beta 0.33, current ratio 3.68x
- Beta 0.33 vs AUID's 1.38
AUID is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 365.9%, EPS growth 55.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.1%
- 365.9% revenue growth vs IDN's -100.0%
IDCC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 438.2% 10Y total return vs IDN's 301.1%
- 44.2% margin vs AUID's -10.1%
- 0.6% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
QLYS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.64 vs IDCC's 0.74
- Lower P/E (12.4x vs 241.0x)
- 19.1% ROA vs AUID's -145.1%, ROIC 47.5% vs -337.3%
Among these 5 stocks, VRNS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 365.9% revenue growth vs IDN's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.4x vs 241.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 44.2% margin vs AUID's -10.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs AUID's 1.38 | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +164.5% vs AUID's -78.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.1% ROA vs AUID's -145.1%, ROIC 47.5% vs -337.3% |
IDN vs AUID vs IDCC vs QLYS vs VRNS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IDN vs AUID vs IDCC vs QLYS vs VRNS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IDCC leads in 3 of 6 categories
QLYS leads 1 • IDN leads 1 • AUID leads 0 • VRNS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IDCC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IDCC and IDN operate at a comparable scale, with $829M and $0 in trailing revenue. IDCC is the more profitable business, keeping 44.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AUID's -10.1%. On growth, VRNS holds the edge at +26.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $2M | $829M | $685M | $660M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | -$19M | $489M | $241M | -$135M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1M | -$18M | $366M | $201M | -$137M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | -$15M | $580M | $290M | $120M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +96.5% | +83.4% | +83.1% | +78.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -10.2% | +49.6% | +33.7% | -21.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -10.1% | +44.2% | +29.4% | -20.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -8.2% | +70.0% | +42.4% | +18.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.7% | -142.6% | -2.4% | +9.8% | +26.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -43.3% | -22.6% | -38.0% | +10.1% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
QLYS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.3x trailing earnings, QLYS trades at a 27% valuation discount to IDCC's 23.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IDCC offers better value at 0.45x vs QLYS's 0.89x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $149M | $17M | $7.2B | $3.3B | $3.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $140M | $9M | $7.0B | $3.2B | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -0.92x | 23.70x | 17.33x | -25.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 71.44x | — | 38.80x | 12.43x | 240.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.45x | 0.89x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 68.64x | — | 12.96x | 13.40x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 19.56x | 8.63x | 4.96x | 5.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.21x | 1.14x | 8.75x | 6.12x | 6.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 33.25x | — | 13.62x | 10.91x | 24.86x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — IDCC and QLYS each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QLYS delivers a 37.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $-180 for AUID. AUID carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VRNS's 0.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IDN scores 6/9 vs AUID's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.8% | -180.2% | +33.4% | +37.2% | -27.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.2% | -145.1% | +17.7% | +19.1% | -8.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -3.4% | +40.9% | +47.5% | -11.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -116.3% | +38.1% | +37.8% | -14.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.02x | 0.46x | 0.17x | 0.96x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | -$8M | -$233M | -$153M | $369M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $8M | $739M | $250M | $202M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $240,884 | $506M | $97M | $572M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -670.14x | 11.48x | — | -9.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IDCC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IDCC five years ago would be worth $41,282 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $170 for AUID. Over the past 12 months, IDN leads with a +164.5% total return vs AUID's -78.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IDCC at 52.2% vs AUID's -25.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.6% | +32.0% | -13.9% | -28.0% | -11.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +164.5% | -78.1% | +33.2% | -29.4% | -37.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +231.8% | -58.4% | +252.7% | -18.2% | +23.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.4% | -98.3% | +312.8% | -6.4% | -37.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +301.1% | -98.3% | +438.2% | +264.7% | +315.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +49.2% | -25.3% | +52.2% | -6.5% | +7.2% |
Risk & Volatility
IDN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IDN is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AUID's 1.38 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IDN currently trades 81.4% from its 52-week high vs AUID's 19.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.33x | 1.38x | 1.11x | 0.46x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.07 | $6.48 | $412.60 | $155.47 | $63.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.62 | $0.84 | $205.78 | $74.51 | $19.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.4% | +19.9% | +67.8% | +60.6% | +44.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.5 | 50.0 | 31.2 | 60.0 | 70.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 391K | 225K | 392K | 772K | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
IDCC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IDN as "Buy", IDCC as "Buy", QLYS as "Hold", VRNS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 52.0% upside for IDCC (target: $425) vs 9.2% for QLYS (target: $103). IDCC is the only dividend payer here at 0.63% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.50 | — | $425.00 | $103.00 | $36.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | — | 16 | 48 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.6% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 4 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.76 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.4% | +5.5% | +3.4% |
IDCC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). QLYS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
IDN vs AUID vs IDCC vs QLYS vs VRNS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IDN or AUID or IDCC or QLYS or VRNS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, authID Inc.
(AUID) is the stronger pick with 365. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Intellicheck, Inc. (IDN). Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) offers the better valuation at 17. 3x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intellicheck, Inc. (IDN) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IDN or AUID or IDCC or QLYS or VRNS?
On trailing P/E, Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is the cheapest at 17. 3x versus InterDigital, Inc. at 23. 7x. On forward P/E, Qualys, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Qualys, Inc. wins at 0. 64x versus InterDigital, Inc. 's 0. 74x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IDN or AUID or IDCC or QLYS or VRNS?
Over the past 5 years, InterDigital, Inc.
(IDCC) delivered a total return of +312. 8%, compared to -98. 3% for authID Inc. (AUID). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IDCC returned +438. 2% versus AUID's -98. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IDN or AUID or IDCC or QLYS or VRNS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intellicheck, Inc.
(IDN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 33β versus authID Inc. 's 1. 38β — meaning AUID is approximately 324% more volatile than IDN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, authID Inc. (AUID) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 96% for Varonis Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IDN or AUID or IDCC or QLYS or VRNS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), authID Inc.
(AUID) is pulling ahead at 365. 9% versus -100. 0% for Intellicheck, Inc. (IDN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intellicheck, Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -31. 4% for Varonis Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IDCC leads at 22. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IDN or AUID or IDCC or QLYS or VRNS?
InterDigital, Inc.
(IDCC) is the more profitable company, earning 48. 8% net margin versus -1610. 6% for authID Inc. — meaning it keeps 48. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IDCC leads at 55. 3% versus -1656. 5% for AUID. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AUID leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IDN or AUID or IDCC or QLYS or VRNS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 64x versus InterDigital, Inc. 's 0. 74x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) trades at 12. 4x forward P/E versus 241. 0x for Varonis Systems, Inc. — 228. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IDCC: 52. 0% to $425. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — IDN or AUID or IDCC or QLYS or VRNS?
In this comparison, IDCC (0.
6% yield) pays a dividend. IDN, AUID, QLYS, VRNS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IDN or AUID or IDCC or QLYS or VRNS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intellicheck, Inc.
(IDN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33), +301. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IDN: +301. 1%, AUID: -98. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IDN and AUID and IDCC and QLYS and VRNS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IDN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AUID is a small-cap high-growth stock; IDCC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; QLYS is a small-cap deep-value stock; VRNS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. IDCC pays a dividend while IDN, AUID, QLYS, VRNS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.