Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
IE vs HBM vs FCX vs TECK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Copper
Copper
Industrial Materials
IE vs HBM vs FCX vs TECK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Copper | Copper | Industrial Materials |
| Market Cap | $2.16B | $9.46B | $87.11B | $29.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $2.22B | $26.42B | $12.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-117M | $570M | $2.73B | $1.85B |
| Gross Margin | -9.5% | 32.5% | 27.8% | 30.3% |
| Operating Margin | -53.7% | 41.4% | 27.8% | 23.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.3x | 22.4x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $37M | $1.09B | $11.50B | $10.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $176M | $568M | $3.35B | $5.01B |
IE vs HBM vs FCX vs TECK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ivanhoe Electric In… (IE) | 100 | 157.2 | +57.2% |
| Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) | 100 | 584.6 | +484.6% |
| Freeport-McMoRan In… (FCX) | 100 | 207.1 | +107.1% |
| Teck Resources Limi… (TECK) | 100 | 198.7 | +98.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IE vs HBM vs FCX vs TECK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
HBM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- 25.8% margin vs IE's -34.8%
- +219.0% vs FCX's +65.3%
- 9.8% ROA vs IE's -25.1%, ROIC 12.0% vs -28.1%
FCX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.79, yield 1.0%
- 1.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs HBM's 0.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
TECK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 18.6%, EPS growth 262.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -14.7%
- 6.0% 10Y total return vs HBM's 5.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.73, Low D/E 40.0%, current ratio 2.54x
- Beta 1.73, yield 0.6%, current ratio 2.54x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.6% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.0x vs 22.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.8% margin vs IE's -34.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.73 vs IE's 2.39 | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs HBM's 0.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +219.0% vs FCX's +65.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.8% ROA vs IE's -25.1%, ROIC 12.0% vs -28.1% |
IE vs HBM vs FCX vs TECK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
IE vs HBM vs FCX vs TECK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HBM leads in 2 of 6 categories
TECK leads 1 • FCX leads 1 • IE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HBM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCX is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.4B annually — 7847.0x IE's $3M. HBM is the more profitable business, keeping 25.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IE's -34.8%. On growth, TECK holds the edge at +72.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $2.2B | $26.4B | $12.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$178M | $1.4B | $9.6B | $4.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$117M | $570M | $2.7B | $1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$78M | $215M | $6.2B | $482M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -9.5% | +32.5% | +27.8% | +30.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -53.7% | +41.4% | +27.8% | +23.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -34.8% | +25.8% | +10.3% | +14.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -23.1% | +9.7% | +23.6% | +3.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.7% | +26.0% | +12.2% | +72.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.3% | +5.1% | +154.2% | +128.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HBM and TECK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.3x trailing earnings, HBM trades at a 59% valuation discount to FCX's 39.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HBM's 9.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TECK's 12.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $9.5B | $87.1B | $29.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $10.0B | $95.3B | $33.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -17.32x | 16.34x | 39.88x | 29.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.31x | 22.41x | 12.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.33x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.77x | 11.16x | 12.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 666.25x | 4.30x | 3.38x | 3.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.31x | 2.93x | 2.84x | 1.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 47.82x | 78.05x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — IE and FCX each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HBM delivers a 19.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-30 for IE. IE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TECK's 0.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TECK scores 6/9 vs IE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -29.8% | +19.2% | +8.9% | +7.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -25.1% | +9.8% | +4.7% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -28.1% | +12.0% | +12.8% | +4.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -28.8% | +11.3% | +12.4% | +4.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.34x | 0.37x | 0.40x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$139M | $524M | $8.1B | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $176M | $568M | $3.4B | $5.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $37M | $1.1B | $11.5B | $10.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.46x | 13.44x | 17.68x | 4.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HBM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HBM five years ago would be worth $25,920 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,667 for IE. Over the past 12 months, HBM leads with a +219.0% total return vs FCX's +65.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HBM at 65.2% vs IE's 3.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.3% | +18.7% | +17.3% | +26.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +116.5% | +219.0% | +65.3% | +79.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.3% | +350.8% | +70.7% | +40.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.7% | +159.2% | +44.3% | +147.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.7% | +552.2% | +507.7% | +599.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.9% | +65.2% | +19.5% | +12.0% |
Risk & Volatility
TECK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TECK is the less volatile stock with a 1.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IE's 2.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TECK currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs IE's 63.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.39x | 1.91x | 1.79x | 1.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.55 | $28.74 | $70.97 | $63.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.02 | $7.42 | $35.15 | $30.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +63.5% | +83.0% | +85.4% | +95.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.8 | 54.0 | 49.1 | 62.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 5.3M | 15.4M | 3.9M |
Analyst Outlook
FCX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IE as "Buy", HBM as "Buy", FCX as "Buy", TECK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 18.2% upside for IE (target: $16) vs -56.6% for HBM (target: $10). For income investors, FCX offers the higher dividend yield at 0.99% vs TECK's 0.60%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.17 | $10.34 | $67.00 | $64.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 20 | 41 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.1% | +1.0% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.01 | $0.60 | $0.50 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +2.5% |
HBM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). TECK leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
IE vs HBM vs FCX vs TECK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IE or HBM or FCX or TECK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the stronger pick with 18.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) offers the better valuation at 16. 3x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ivanhoe Electric Inc. (IE) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IE or HBM or FCX or TECK?
On trailing P/E, Hudbay Minerals Inc.
(HBM) is the cheapest at 16. 3x versus Freeport-McMoRan Inc. at 39. 9x. On forward P/E, Teck Resources Limited is actually cheaper at 13. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IE or HBM or FCX or TECK?
Over the past 5 years, Hudbay Minerals Inc.
(HBM) delivered a total return of +159. 2%, compared to +26. 7% for Ivanhoe Electric Inc. (IE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TECK returned +599. 3% versus IE's +26. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IE or HBM or FCX or TECK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
73β versus Ivanhoe Electric Inc. 's 2. 39β — meaning IE is approximately 38% more volatile than TECK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ivanhoe Electric Inc. (IE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 40% for Teck Resources Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IE or HBM or FCX or TECK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is pulling ahead at 18.
6% versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hudbay Minerals Inc. grew EPS 630. 0% year-over-year, compared to 16. 9% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HBM leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IE or HBM or FCX or TECK?
Hudbay Minerals Inc.
(HBM) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 3% net margin versus -32. 6% for Ivanhoe Electric Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HBM leads at 25. 5% versus -34. 2% for IE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HBM leads at 29. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IE or HBM or FCX or TECK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) trades at 13.
0x forward P/E versus 22. 4x for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. — 9. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IE: 18. 2% to $16. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — IE or HBM or FCX or TECK?
In this comparison, FCX (1.
0% yield), TECK (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. IE, HBM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IE or HBM or FCX or TECK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.
6% yield, +599. 3% 10Y return). Ivanhoe Electric Inc. (IE) carries a higher beta of 2. 39 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TECK: +599. 3%, IE: +26. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IE and HBM and FCX and TECK?
These companies operate in different sectors (IE (Technology) and HBM (Basic Materials) and FCX (Basic Materials) and TECK (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HBM is a small-cap deep-value stock; FCX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TECK is a mid-cap high-growth stock. FCX, TECK pay a dividend while IE, HBM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.