Broadcasting
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
IHRT vs CMLS vs SIRI vs WMG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Broadcasting
Entertainment
Entertainment
IHRT vs CMLS vs SIRI vs WMG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Broadcasting | Broadcasting | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $880M | $87K | $9.00B | $16.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.86B | $772M | $8.58B | $7.13B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-473M | $-297M | $846M | $452M |
| Gross Margin | 78.5% | 62.7% | 45.4% | 44.4% |
| Operating Margin | -0.5% | -31.3% | 18.0% | 12.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 8.5x | 23.4x |
| Total Debt | $5.79B | $795M | $9.71B | $4.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $271K | $64M | $94M | $532M |
IHRT vs CMLS vs SIRI vs WMG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) | 100 | 67.9 | -32.1% |
| Cumulus Media Inc. (CMLS) | 100 | 1.9 | -98.1% |
| Sirius XM Holdings … (SIRI) | 100 | 45.6 | -54.4% |
| Warner Music Group … (WMG) | 100 | 105.2 | +5.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IHRT vs CMLS vs SIRI vs WMG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IHRT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +415.5% vs CMLS's -96.2%
CMLS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SIRI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 3.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 83.9%, current ratio 0.30x
- Beta 0.65, yield 3.8%, current ratio 0.30x
- Lower P/E (8.5x vs 23.4x)
WMG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 4.4%, EPS growth -16.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.3%
- 15.3% 10Y total return vs SIRI's -7.8%
- 4.4% revenue growth vs CMLS's -2.1%
- 4.5% ROA vs CMLS's -27.1%, ROIC 11.4% vs -20.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.4% revenue growth vs CMLS's -2.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.5x vs 23.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.9% margin vs CMLS's -38.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs CMLS's 1.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs WMG's 2.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +415.5% vs CMLS's -96.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.5% ROA vs CMLS's -27.1%, ROIC 11.4% vs -20.5% |
IHRT vs CMLS vs SIRI vs WMG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IHRT vs CMLS vs SIRI vs WMG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SIRI leads in 3 of 6 categories
WMG leads 1 • IHRT leads 1 • CMLS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SIRI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SIRI is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.6B annually — 11.1x CMLS's $772M. SIRI is the more profitable business, keeping 9.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMLS's -38.4%. On growth, WMG holds the edge at +16.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.9B | $772M | $8.6B | $7.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $339M | -$185M | $2.1B | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$473M | -$297M | $846M | $452M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $11M | -$10M | $1.4B | $694M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.5% | +62.7% | +45.4% | +44.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | -31.3% | +18.0% | +12.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -12.2% | -38.4% | +9.9% | +6.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | -1.3% | +15.8% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.8% | -11.5% | +1.1% | +16.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.8% | -91.8% | +22.0% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SIRI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.9x trailing earnings, SIRI trades at a 73% valuation discount to WMG's 44.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SIRI's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IHRT's 19.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $880M | $87,200 | $9.0B | $16.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.7B | $731M | $18.6B | $20.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.86x | -0.00x | 11.89x | 44.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 8.53x | 23.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.24x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.65x | — | 9.04x | 17.55x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.23x | 0.00x | 1.05x | 2.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.01x | 0.83x | 21.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 80.64x | — | 7.23x | 30.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WMG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMG delivers a 55.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $56 in annual profit, vs $-193 for CMLS. SIRI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.84x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMLS's 114.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SIRI scores 5/9 vs WMG's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -193.0% | +7.3% | +55.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.0% | -27.1% | +3.1% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.4% | -20.5% | +5.2% | +11.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.5% | -21.0% | +6.1% | +12.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 114.33x | 0.84x | 6.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.8B | $731M | $9.6B | $4.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $270,900 | $64M | $94M | $532M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.8B | $795M | $9.7B | $4.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.17x | -0.03x | 3.50x | 5.43x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IHRT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMG five years ago would be worth $9,383 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for CMLS. Over the past 12 months, IHRT leads with a +415.5% total return vs CMLS's -96.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IHRT at 23.0% vs CMLS's -87.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +36.6% | -93.2% | +31.7% | +2.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +415.5% | -96.2% | +31.6% | +5.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +85.9% | -99.8% | -17.6% | +16.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.0% | -100.0% | -43.8% | -6.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.5% | -100.0% | -7.8% | +15.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.0% | -87.6% | -6.2% | +5.2% |
Risk & Volatility
SIRI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SIRI is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMLS's 1.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SIRI currently trades 93.0% from its 52-week high vs CMLS's 2.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.82x | 1.87x | 0.65x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.56 | $0.20 | $28.77 | $34.63 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.08 | $0.00 | $19.77 | $23.34 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.4% | +2.5% | +93.0% | +89.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.6 | 25.5 | 59.8 | 66.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 986K | 1.4M | 4.8M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SIRI and WMG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IHRT as "Buy", SIRI as "Buy", WMG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.4% upside for WMG (target: $36) vs -38.3% for IHRT (target: $4). For income investors, SIRI offers the higher dividend yield at 3.82% vs IHRT's 0.19%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.50 | — | $26.75 | $35.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | — | 32 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | — | +3.8% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.01 | — | $1.02 | $0.74 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +100.0% | +1.5% | +0.1% |
SIRI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WMG leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
IHRT vs CMLS vs SIRI vs WMG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IHRT or CMLS or SIRI or WMG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Warner Music Group Corp.
(WMG) is the stronger pick with 4. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 1% for Cumulus Media Inc. (CMLS). Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI) offers the better valuation at 11. 9x trailing P/E (8. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IHRT or CMLS or SIRI or WMG?
On trailing P/E, Sirius XM Holdings Inc.
(SIRI) is the cheapest at 11. 9x versus Warner Music Group Corp. at 44. 3x. On forward P/E, Sirius XM Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IHRT or CMLS or SIRI or WMG?
Over the past 5 years, Warner Music Group Corp.
(WMG) delivered a total return of -6. 2%, compared to -100. 0% for Cumulus Media Inc. (CMLS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMG returned +15. 3% versus CMLS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IHRT or CMLS or SIRI or WMG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sirius XM Holdings Inc.
(SIRI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus Cumulus Media Inc. 's 1. 87β — meaning CMLS is approximately 188% more volatile than SIRI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 84% versus 114% for Cumulus Media Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IHRT or CMLS or SIRI or WMG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Warner Music Group Corp.
(WMG) is pulling ahead at 4. 4% versus -2. 1% for Cumulus Media Inc. (CMLS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sirius XM Holdings Inc. grew EPS 145. 6% year-over-year, compared to -145. 8% for Cumulus Media Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMG leads at 4. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IHRT or CMLS or SIRI or WMG?
Sirius XM Holdings Inc.
(SIRI) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 4% net margin versus -34. 2% for Cumulus Media Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SIRI leads at 17. 2% versus -29. 0% for CMLS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IHRT leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IHRT or CMLS or SIRI or WMG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sirius XM Holdings Inc.
(SIRI) trades at 8. 5x forward P/E versus 23. 4x for Warner Music Group Corp. — 14. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WMG: 14. 4% to $35. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — IHRT or CMLS or SIRI or WMG?
In this comparison, SIRI (3.
8% yield), WMG (2. 4% yield), IHRT (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. CMLS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IHRT or CMLS or SIRI or WMG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Warner Music Group Corp.
(WMG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), 2. 4% yield). Cumulus Media Inc. (CMLS) carries a higher beta of 1. 87 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMG: +15. 3%, CMLS: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IHRT and CMLS and SIRI and WMG?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IHRT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CMLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SIRI is a small-cap deep-value stock; WMG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SIRI, WMG pay a dividend while IHRT, CMLS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.